Sports_Fanatic
Assistant Pro
I hope they all enjoyed it, always great those days when everything goes and you just can't miss a shot.
Did you not read my earlier post?Good work by the hcp committee. He'll only be able to score 45 points now. ?
Actually about 12 better (note: 36 points is not playing to handicap).
Amazing how this point is simply missed
Maybe, just maybe...the golfer is improving. Maybe they didn;t hit driver as they realised they can't control it. With such a short course, maybe they just hit 5i off the tee and then got it on from there, making a load of pars. Would love to see a hole by hole breakdown of score....trying to find the comp on HDID, and so far, this result doesn't seem to exist
Also, just read on Twitter (from the club's head pro) that the guy used to be single figures before losing the use of most of his left side in a car accident, and having other health issues.
Thing is Ken we can take comfort from the fact that no one is going to have that sort of points in the (thankfully few) stablefords that we have at Dunbar, I had a quick look back through the last few years and they are won with 38 to 42 points, the higher points ones tend to be the seniors which as we know are off the yellowsSurely if they have the potential to score 14 shots better than their hcp they shouldn't be off 27?
Hcp comps are meant to level the playing field. I have no chance of scoring 50 points (9 under par!).
This is why we shouldn't judge anyone for having a worldy score. You never know what's going on behind the scenes. I wonder if Steve Whillance knows he's internet semi-famous today?Also, just read on Twitter (from the club's head pro) that the guy used to be single figures before losing the use of most of his left side in a car accident, and having other health issues.
Had a browse and found that the same player won a comp last year.
View attachment 42995
As @Billysboots said, he does have nightmare scores as well.
Also, just read on Twitter (from the club's head pro) that the guy used to be single figures before losing the use of most of his left side in a car accident, and having other health issues.
I'm happy he's had a great day and still playing golf but at the same time, should he be a 27? Your handicap should never allow you to be net 14 under par on your best day imho.Also, just read on Twitter (from the club's head pro) that the guy used to be single figures before losing the use of most of his left side in a car accident, and having other health issues.
I'm happy he's had a great day and still playing golf but at the same time, should he be a 27? Your handicap should never allow you to be net 14 under par on your best day imho.
The automatic additional exceptional score reduction would have been -2.0, for shooting more than 10 shots under his IndexThe exceptional score reduction may have been whs-automatic for being 7 shots or more below HI.
I don't really agree, I think if you've shot 80 for example, then you're capable of shooting 80 and there's nothing to say you won't do it again in the future. If you do never do it again then your handicap will come back down. Obviously in the old system he'd have been cut about 5 shots for this round which I think is fair enough for such a big leap forward in scoring. In WHS though he almost certainly won't be cut anywhere near that much, and thus even a slightly worse round next time will produce a huge points total.But by the same token is it really fair to slash him to such an extent that he can only compete once in the bluest of blue moons, just because he’s had one of those days? That would make for a miserable experience for him.
That’s why we have the WHS, and in the main it is doing a pretty good job in maintaining accurate handicaps IF, and it’s a big if, players submit regular cards.
This fella clearly does so I’m not really sure why this debate has reached nearly three pages.