SwingsitlikeHogan
Major Champion
If the members at my club truly felt that our dress code was so outdated to be absurd and a block to new members joining and the cause of others leaving then we’d have a motion raised at our AGM requesting a change to the code. In the near 19 years that I have been a member at my current club there has been no such motion raised and neither can I recall any in the 12yrs at my previous club.I dont think its the full story. Law has to have a solid basis, clarity, and equity, to be respected. Not dropping a ball in the rough when no one is looking, or toeing a sand shot on to a nice tee, pose no problem.
But the dress issue does. Particulary when the woolly arguments like 'tradition', 'standards', and worst of all 'well, they are the rules' are the best that seem to be mustered. They are not answers at all. Nobody is arguing at an AGM for Mulligans, or no penalty shots for out of bounds. But a better explanation from supporters of, or committees maintaining such dress codes/rules, other than 'thats always been the way here at Backwards GC', should be offered.
That said, to address the point of the thread, my current club aims to be traditional yet forward thinking in its attitudes and so we (as we are a members club) have recognised changes in golf attire being offered by the golf sports brands and have, to a large extent, evolved and aligned our dress code with what’s on offer. But what is worn should be worn as intended by design, which does in general mean golf shirts being tucked in and hence there being a bit of a grey area.
I recognise that grey area and can accept the intent of the code and as a member simply choose to avoid unnecessary confrontation by staying the traditional side of the code. It’s not difficult and it’s absolutely not a big deal, in fact it’s no deal whatsoever for me to make that choice. ?
Last edited: