Rana Naved is the ex player in question. It’s now being reported elsewhere that he was present when Vaughan made the alleged “too many of you lot” comment, and corroborates Rafiq’s account.
There's going to be more and more players popping out of the woodwork to defend their position before the MP committee hearing and before the FULL report is published. And the key point is the FULL report. Extracts from a redacted version isn't great, leading to tit-bit headlines. This has a long way to go yet....
No sympathy for Vaughan, he's was gunning for Robinson earlier in the summer for tweets made in his past.
No sympathy for Vaughan, he's was gunning for Robinson earlier in the summer for tweets made in his past.
I know that I am very much pre-judging with no knowledge but I can hear him saying that line in my head. You know, in that sort of alloof, sounds a bit like I am joking but I mean it really sort of way. I can just see the next press release being 'if I did say it, I was only having a bit of a joke'. Really should no pre-judge anyone but the fact that he can use his knowledge of a report in his defence that nobody else has seen and can use his column to get that across to a wide audience winds me up a bit.
Roger Hutton has resigned according to the BBC.
In his statement he also said that it is a matter of record that the ECB were asked to help in the initial investigation… this is getting uglier and uglier.
Yes he was very quick on the 'it wasn't me ' stance.
He was calling for Robinson to go straight away, so he should stand down too until cleared or not.
To be slightly fair to the ECB (and they have not been great in this) they were asked to be involved in the internal investigation which I understand why they had to decline. They needed to remain impartial to allow a later involvement in the oversight and arbitration based on the findings and so could not be conflicted out by being involved directly in the investigation.
Rana Naved is the ex player in question. It’s now being reported elsewhere that he was present when Vaughan made the alleged “too many of you lot” comment, and corroborates Rafiq’s account.
Its a tough one. A county needs help but the ECB felt conflicted. At least Yorkshire employed a top (independent) barrister, Rehana Azib to head up the initial inquiry. Why couldn’t the ECB send X dept to help but set out at the outset that Y dept would arbitrate if needed?
In fact, arbitration could have been carried out by ICAS, the international arbitration body for sport. If they’d gone down that route, no one could have suggested any bias.
Certainly not an easy one but from a legal background I can see why the ECB may have declined to be involved which is something that some in the media cannot see. I can see a few people throwing mud at the ECB in the coming weeks to try and deflect from their own involvement.
From what little I've seen of cricket, it looks like a pretty good game [unlike the terminal boredom of soccer rules football that you so enjoy].
The white uniforms look very classy, and the bats are more expensive looking than baseball bats.
My only question is this: do all matches take four months to play?
How much time for recreation does the average Indian have?