D
Deleted member 15344
Guest
I’m still staggered that Yorkshire are still quiet - nothing from them and imo it just shows their arrogance. Hope to see them punished in the strongest possible way when this all comes out
Gary Ballance the first to come out and admit using the racial slur
He said: "I am aware of how hurtful the racial slur is and I regret that I used this word in immature exchanges in my younger years and I am sure Rafa feels the same about some of the things he said to me as well."
Laced with an after tone of victim blaming
Gary Balance’ s comments; for me, there’s some areas banter should never go, end of. As for the mitigation (deflection) Ballance expresses, it has no relevance. Whether Rafiq responded in kind or not, the initial comments should have never been made.
Absolutely agree. But I do get a growing sense that nobody is going to emerge from this unscathed, and I suspect that will include Rafiq.
Absolutely agree. But I do get a growing sense that nobody is going to emerge from this unscathed, and I suspect that will include Rafiq.
I think that may be the most prescient posting on the entire issue - one suspects (and for transparency, I say this as a lifelong Yorkshire supporter) that there is an awful lot of much left to be raked over in terms of the fine print of the report that will result in further litigation(s), at least one resignation and - since the precedent is there with the Ollie Robinson affair - bans, and it has to be remembered that Rafiq himself has previously served a ban for making - lets calls them ill advised comments. Indeed, it may be inevitable that this stretches beyond Yorkshire and takes in much of the rest of the county game.
In any event, root and branch clear out is about right. A sad thing for me is that there has been no focus on what is in many ways the most damning allegation, around selection policies for age group teams. From my years coaching in Middlesex, I can well believe those allegations, because exactly the same attitude appears to apply here. The game as a whole has a massive problem if it is in effect cutting off its own nose by denying opportunities to the most promising young players.
That said, anything that Rafiq may or may not have said or done does not mitigate or absolve Yorkshire CCC's or Gary Ballance's behaviour.
I totally agree, and hope my comments to date do not suggest otherwise. On its most basic level, it is very much a case of two wrongs not making a right.
On its most basic level, it is very much a case of two wrongs not making a right.
If those suggestions are correct, then it may be that YCCC have taken the astonishingly naive decision to try and draw a line under the event, basing this on the assumption that any exchanges were six of one, half a dozen of the other. That totally disregards the fact that at least one party, quite possibly both, have been guilty of racism.
Moving on to your second point, as a young man thirty years ago I played the game to a good standard, many of my contemporaries being on the books of my local county side. Even then, playing in a county with a diverse population, it was plainly obvious to all that we were the home to a number of ridiculously talented young cricketers from BAME backgrounds. The same still applies today. And yet, throughout all that time, not a single local BAME player has graced our county second XI, never mind getting near playing first class cricket. I know any number of friends and family from Yorkshire who, for decades, have been left scratching their heads as to why YCCC has never tapped into the rich vein of talent available to them in parts of West Yorkshire, for example.
I really do not understand this whole situation. Unless the report showed racism from across the club or from some massive names then the actions just do not make sense. Surely they could see that this would not go away and it needed some dscipline of the playing staff and some reeignations at board level. Swift action like that would have been seen as appropriate. Now there is just building concern as to how damning that report is and what level of people are being named.
I would say both come out of it badly. I am not suggesting life bans should have been imposed, or anything like that, but you would have thought that some form of sanction would/should have been applied to make a clear statement along the lines of zero tolerance
Interested as to which county you grew up in? I played district level and trialled at county in Yorkshire around the same era and it was...different, but worryingly similar. Different, in that at that time the separation of the club game was so extreme that there were limited pathways, which it could be argued made it more difficult for coaches to become sighted on the best young talent, similar in that you never got the impression that said coaches were that interested in looking. If anything, where I live now in Middlesex it was worse - aside from race, class (and particular, attendance at a public school) is a massive factor, though in the last two or three years there have at least been signs of improvement.
I really do not understand this whole situation. Unless the report showed racism from across the club or from some massive names then the actions just do not make sense. Surely they could see that this would not go away and it needed some dscipline of the playing staff and some reeignations at board level. Swift action like that would have been seen as appropriate. Now there is just building concern as to how damning that report is and what level of people are being named.