got an email from NNSO at Natures Scot this morning ref my reporting a few Mink sightings along the Canal. appears they have had to give up trying to trap them on this section due to the traps getting Vandalised every time they set them!!!!!
Extraneous hair growing on ears and up nostrils. I mean, WHY?
I take great pleasure in pulling them out, now. Think of them as being as pleasurable as squeezing a big white head and they won’t seem as bad. ?Extraneous hair growing on ears and up nostrils. I mean, WHY?
Extraneous hair growing on ears and up nostrils. I mean, WHY?
People who begrudge those living near or below the poverty line any sort of comfort in life.
For example, the number of people trying to shame parents for having a games console or Sky TV, but still receiving the “£30” food packs.
Imagine life as a family in poverty in a year of lockdown without so much as TV or games to play.
It’s a shame people are so self centred.Because different people have different ideas over what constitutes poverty.
It is understandable that an older person who grew up in the 1950's might find it difficult to understand why not having those items could, in isolation, determine the poverty line.
When talking of childhood we, all of us, will automatically think of our own as an example. One has only to look at a number of threads on this site to see how clearly people recall their formative years.
It does, the issue is the items given to cover a week‘ meals have only cost between £5 & £6 in total, were’s the other £24-£25 gone.As I understand it the £30 is supposedly to compensate for the lack of a weekly midday meal at school. At £6 a day that ought to cover the majority a kids groceries.
It’s a shame people are so self centred.
?It’s a shame people are so self centred.
I did not. But let’s avoid going down the whataboutery route.did you see the woman who complained about her free vouchers as she didn't like Tesco!
As I understand it the £30 is supposedly to compensate for the lack of a weekly midday meal at school. At £6 a day that ought to cover the majority a kids groceries.
I did not. But let’s avoid going down the whataboutery route.
People who begrudge those living near or below the poverty line any sort of comfort in life.
For example, the number of people trying to shame parents for having a games console or Sky TV, but still receiving the “£30” food packs.
Imagine life as a family in poverty in a year of lockdown without so much as TV or games to play.
The people receiving them certainly didn’t, so who exactly were these other people?it was amazing how many people assumed the food parcels were to cover all meals for the whole family
£30 is suppose to cover a 2 week period so £15 a weekAs I understand it the £30 is supposedly to compensate for the lack of a weekly midday meal at school. At £6 a day that ought to cover the majority a kids groceries.
As I pointed out on another forum these food boxes aren't just for those on benefits
Anyone in Scotland and England with a kid in reception up to year 2 will get free school meals so will be entitled to those boxes
I'd be entitled to one next year and I'm not on benefits