Swinglowandslow
Well-known member
The constant statements of “things were better back when …” as people discuss how things are treated differently now
Take the example of the heat wave coming - people are being asked to take extra care etc because of the raise in temps and some peoples initial thoughts are “nanny state” or “protection from lawyers” etc because when we were kids we didn’t need warnings etc
Maybe and it’s just a maybe people have learned from those previous instances that’s the heat coming is actually dangerous and can cause people serious harm -from heat exhaustion to the dangers of the sun giving skin cancer etc - risks that weren’t know in the past
Things move on and change for a reason - and not just down to the fear of being sued
Of course people knew that heat exhaustion was likely if you stayed in the heat without taking precautions.. They might not have called it heat exhaustion but the vernacular "sunstroke" covered it.
My parents and others knew to stay out of the sun, drink plenty of water etc.
Where do you think the "knotted" hankies on the head came from?
The fact that these days there are more idiots about now who choose to not do what they know they should , doesn't mean society should start blaming itself for their behaviour.
And are you seriously telling us that there are now no more lawyers sueing for whatever they can see gives them some "coin"?
There didn't used to be the term " ambulance chasing lawyers" for a reason. I.e They didn't!
In fact, there was a time when solicitors were not allowed to advertise at all.
Ask any Council if it conducts its business without regard to their possibly being sued for their actions, or lack of them.
I don't agree that people did not know the dangers and the risks. Course they did. They just didn't blame the Government, or the Council, or the Police, or the Doctors, or any "body" that they knew might be able to be sued, as their friendly lawyer tells them........if something went wrong.
And , for clarity, tell us, - should kids be allowed to play conkers , or climb trees , or play near hazards?
My childhood was spent growing up within 300 yards of the Leeds and Liverpool canal. I was in it, on it, or near it every day of my life.
There were slag heaps all around that we climbed, fell over on, etc etc
My mates and I went home for meals ( most times?), otherwise mum knew we were "out", somewhere. No phones on us, and no phone at home.
Of course , there were risks, but they were accepted and acceptable.
These days, it would be nice if kids could do roughly the same ( but with mobiles- "in case" ), but they either won't or can't or are not allowed.
I understand why not, these days. It's because there are other reasons than those risks we faced.Much more traffic; and more dangers from people's behaviour that rightly causes parents to be wary etc.
But that is no reason to deny kids taking kid's risks, as some examples I've given.
But that's ( some ) lawyers influence for you.?