SteveW86
Head Pro
LIV cutting back the bonus to the winner from 18 mil to 6mil
Overall bonus put cut by 20mil
Are they looking to reduce outgoings ?
That’s a big drop!
LIV cutting back the bonus to the winner from 18 mil to 6mil
Overall bonus put cut by 20mil
Are they looking to reduce outgoings ?
No.
LIV cutting back the bonus to the winner from 18 mil to 6mil
Overall bonus put cut by 20mil
Are they looking to reduce outgoings ?
So, more emphasis on the team aspect of the competition, but they want more individual ranking points? Strange way of showing they aren't all about the team which was one of the major stumbling blocks for ranking points.No.
While the individual bonus pool has reduced, team prize money has been increased by $7.3m per event ($5m extra for the team pot so all teams get prize money; and $2.3m for the individual players in the top 3 teams). That's almost $95m in total for the 13 individual events.
So overall, prize money has increased significantly.
Maybe before then you will give us an explanation as to how your regulator will work?I'll be the one to make the 200,000th as well Steve.![]()
It probably helps with team financing and potential sale of equity.So, more emphasis on the team aspect of the competition, but they want more individual ranking points? Strange way of showing they aren't all about the team which was one of the major stumbling blocks for ranking points.
Okay. Below is from OWGR-I curious how you come to the view that awarding 44% of the field in a LIV even is "appropriate and defendable"?
Maybe for your reference in a PGA event I believe they award points to 17% of the field. Also some more info for you 17% of 57 = 9.69
It's an opinion for sure.Top ten getting ranking points sounds fair to me. If you finish outside the top ten on a tour with only 4 good players left then you don't deserve any points.
When discussing the Hero World Challenge and OWGR points, what is often overlooked is the fact that it took nine years for that tournament to get points, and they were minimal. So, if people want to compare, they need to start there.Don’t think many haven’t been critical of the Hero Challenge over the years , was a pure invitational but when they got ranking points it was poor, even when they put some qualification for the event ( ironically world ranking)
It shouldn’t get the points it does and think the Nedbank shouldn’t as well
But I think qualifying for the event is what helps
It was a good move forward for LIV to get some level of points but because of the stuff they highlighted they weren’t going to get the same as other because still not fulfilling criteria , think more players can get relegated this season , if those relegated are replaced by players on merit they could see the level of points changing
Ranking points will always be contentious-too long been weighted in favour of US events and it helped reduce the ET to what it is now
Yeah it is fair to remind on that. Do you recall if they actually changed anything that year or was it just a case of grinding them down? I hadn't been able to find a reason.When discussing the Hero World Challenge and OWGR points, what is often overlooked is the fact that it took nine years for that tournament to get points, and they were minimal. So, if people want to compare, they need to start there.
Watched on TNT today. Thought the coverage was decent - it's a much better platform than ITV was to be fair.
Quite a spectacle under the lights and lasers - I'm not sure whether 72 holes will be better than 54, we'll wait and see...
Are they running Wednesday to Saturday then?