Bunkermagnet
Journeyman Pro
I agree, the penalty was justified. Precidence was set by Verstappen doing the same thing to Raikkonen at Japan last year, so if the rule was correct for Ferrari last year it was correct for Ferrari this.
How can the stewards punish Vettel for accidentally running Hamilton off the track in Canada but allow Verstappen to win when he deliberately ran Leclerc off the track? And why did it take 3 hours to make the decision
Farce.
I thought Leclerc had already lost the corner so it was down to him to back out after that. Leclerc lost yesterday because of his teams actions, not Verstappens actions. If Ferrari were to give their drivers equal standing, Leclerc would have won and would be a greater threat. All the time Ferrari and cuddling Vettel like they do, Leclerc will be left and Ferrari won’t challenge.How can the stewards punish Vettel for accidentally running Hamilton off the track in Canada but allow Verstappen to win when he deliberately ran Leclerc off the track? And why did it take 3 hours to make the decision
Farce.
How can the stewards punish Vettel for accidentally running Hamilton off the track in Canada but allow Verstappen to win when he deliberately ran Leclerc off the track? And why did it take 3 hours to make the decision
Farce.
How can the stewards punish Vettel for accidentally running Hamilton off the track in Canada but allow Verstappen to win when he deliberately ran Leclerc off the track? And why did it take 3 hours to make the decision
Farce.
Indeed. Vettel seems to be the first on the mic now claiming "foul" everytime anyone comes near the car. I thought the Leclerc/Verstappen incident was a good old fashioned racing incident although its hard to watch that and the outcome and then the Hamilton/Vettel one and see too many differencesFor me an indication how much the sport is missing Charlie Whiting...
Believe, also, the drivers if they actually mean 'let us get on with the racing'... They need to stop whinging like stuck pigs on their radios to draw attention to every incident...
He/ Leclerc was forced off. Theres racing and there's dirty racing. There's a good write up on the BBC about the
" overtaking" manoeuvre. If getting past someone means you have to force someone off to get by there's something seriously wrong
He/ Leclerc was forced off. Theres racing and there's dirty racing. There's a good write up on the BBC about the
" overtaking" manoeuvre. If getting past someone means you have to force someone off to get by there's something seriously wrong
I agree.
The redbull was obviously faster than the Ferrari and MV could have overtaken Leclerc under DRS without any problem.
I think ultimately it should have been a penalty, but Max has probably benefited from recent coverage of stewards ‘deciding’ races. He had no need to make the move then and like that, but again he chose to do it and should have ultimately paid the price for that.
Leclerc had to make an unnatural manoeuvre to avoid a collision because of the actions of MV, that for me warrants a penalty. I think sometimes people confuse slowing an opponent down, vs being faster than an opponent. Be aggressive and race hard, that’s ultimately what everyone wants, but don’t force your opponent off the road. Imagine if Charles hadn’t of turned to avoid the collision!!
On the race itself, my god did the commentators over do it. That was not a classic race, it was poor and littered with tactical and driver errors.
Also, a driver starting second falling down to 7th and then coming back to win is not one of the greatest achievements ever. In fact it wasn’t even the best achievement of the day.
Let’s start at the beginning, the track is a horrible track reminiscent of that base Scalextric track set you had before you spent a fortune buying loads of track to make it a decent layout.On the race itself, my god did the commentators over do it. That was not a classic race, it was poor and littered with tactical and driver errors.
Also, a driver starting second falling down to 7th and then coming back to win is not one of the greatest achievements ever. In fact it wasn’t even the best achievement of the day.
I think ultimately it should have been a penalty, but Max has probably benefited from recent coverage of stewards ‘deciding’ races. He had no need to make the move then and like that, but again he chose to do it and should have ultimately paid the price for that.
Leclerc had to make an unnatural manoeuvre to avoid a collision because of the actions of MV, that for me warrants a penalty. I think sometimes people confuse slowing an opponent down, vs being faster than an opponent. Be aggressive and race hard, that’s ultimately what everyone wants, but don’t force your opponent off the road. Imagine if Charles hadn’t of turned to avoid the collision!!
On the race itself, my god did the commentators over do it. That was not a classic race, it was poor and littered with tactical and driver errors.
Also, a driver starting second falling down to 7th and then coming back to win is not one of the greatest achievements ever. In fact it wasn’t even the best achievement of the day.
How can the stewards punish Vettel for accidentally running Hamilton off the track in Canada but allow Verstappen to win when he deliberately ran Leclerc off the track? And why did it take 3 hours to make the decision
Farce.
This is my point, drivers going nose to nose, that I can accept all day long. But why did MV have to force Leclerc off the track.
Let’s start at the beginning, the track is a horrible track reminiscent of that base Scalextric track set you had before you spent a fortune buying loads of track to make it a decent layout.
Uummm... He didn't... He asked the question concede or bang wheels... The late great Ayrton Senna asked the same question on many occasions...