SAPCOR1
Journeyman Pro
Dont you ever get bored of this? You'll never catch homer you know..
I don't mind, the wife is watching BGT 😂
Dont you ever get bored of this? You'll never catch homer you know..
And the club is ?
*note to self* read the previous posts, before posting something contentious
theres a good lad.
Harburn. If you are ever up this way and fancy a game then let me know and I will treat you. My golf is poor but I dress well 🏌️👍😋
I think i may got your place at Archerfield GC a couple of months ago :thup:
I get all that, what I have tried to understand over the years is why
Personally I tuck my shirt in, wear polo tops, belt on my trousers but if others want to wear an untucked t-shirt, cargo shorts/trousers one red sock & one green sock then that is their choice. It doesn't offend me or make me think any different of them.
Some of the sights you see that confirm to the dress code(s) look far "scruffier"
Thumbs up. Like etc etc
This is the only stance i find odd, i really cant see the difference between a supposed golf polo, one from a high end fashion retailer, and one from primani. If the asthetics are similar that is. If by golf attire, we strictly mean only those produced for golf by a manufacturer of golf clothing and other such paraphernalia, then well thats just daft for all but the most exclusive establishments.
That all being said, never had an issue with dress codes as long as its fairly generic.
How do all feel about the shirts tucked in rule?
The reason was because it was part of the dress code.
Clubs are democratic and can make their rules as they wish, and people can choose to be members of them or not, but I find it truly extraordinary in this day and age that people choose to impose restriction of the dress choice of their peers. They should get on with just playing their own game in the attire of their choosing rather than judging others who simply want to play their game.
There is no way around it, it is no less than old fashioned snobbery, elitism, and a desire to maintain some sort of class distinction between those they deem suitable to be fellow clubmates, and those they wish to exclude. It is no small contributor to the decline in golf participation, and its rising age profile.
Clubs are democratic and can make their rules as they wish, and people can choose to be members of them or not, but I find it truly extraordinary in this day and age that people choose to impose restriction of the dress choice of their peers. They should get on with just playing their own game in the attire of their choosing rather than judging others who simply want to play their game.
There is no way around it, it is no less than old fashioned snobbery, elitism, and a desire to maintain some sort of class distinction between those they deem suitable to be fellow clubmates, and those they wish to exclude. It is no small contributor to the decline in golf participation, and its rising age profile.
I can't believe this has racked up 28 pages, I must have inadvertently opened a can of worms!
I think ultimately everyone has a slightly different view on dress codes. But luckily there are huge numbers of courses, each with slightly different nuances on it, so we can just play wherever suits us really.
But to answer my original question - they just let Tiger do what he wants right?
It is no small contributor to the decline in golf participation, and its rising age profile.
What a crock of nonsense.
Many clubs are flourishing with restricted dress codes in the same way many clubs are struggling with relaxed dress codes.
I would love to see some proof to back this claim up?
I would go as far as saying that the traditional clubs with dress code etc are doing better than most of the more relaxed proprietary clubs. Certainly all the ones that have closed in the last few years in my neck of the woods have been 'more relaxed'.
The ones closed had far more to do with income that what people did or did not wear.
That sounds a bit dangerous!We always just went to a pub with a bear garden instead