Swango1980
Well-known member
As Billy says, none of us can say for certain what happenned. We can interpret what we saw, and give out best guess. We can say what the likelihood it. However, presumably you framed your question to suggest that the recording and injuries prove beyond all reasonable doubt that Greenwood is guilty. Although he may well be, I will try and give a counter argument, just to display a possible reason why it might not be as clear cut.So what’s your thoughts on the recording & the girl’s injuries?
One of my mates is the nicest guy you'll ever meet. Charming, skinny, completely non-aggressive and never says a bad word about anyone. Last year he shocked me, when he was talking about a recent relationship he was in, and he said the girl he was with liked to be strangled. After much piss taking, he explained she likes it rough, and that it is quite common with some of the girls he has met before. I continued to take the piss. However, could Greenwoods gf enjoy that type of relationship? Could that perhaps explain some of the vulgar things heard on tape?
As for the injuries, even I'd like to think that if a girl likes that type of relationship, not to the extent of proper physical harm!???? But, maybe those injuries were caused by something else? Maybe she is an aggressive girl and Greenwood did lash out (still out of order), or in self defence?
Again, I'd like to point out, I'm not assuming Greenwood is an angel. I'm just thinking of a possible scenario where the evidence we have seen in the press might not be as clear cut as we'd expect?