The Cricket Thread

[Kellfire]

My opinion is different. I think there was enough doubt from Snicko as a spike appeared next to the bat. You maybe right. I maybe right. There was enough doubt for the 3rd umpire to say to give the benefit, but that doesn't happen.

The noise that was just appearing as the ball was already well within the plane of the bat was the pad. The noise would’ve been earlier from the bat.

Some things aren’t opinions and the evidence showed that wasn’t nicked.

 

[Piece]

Love it! Washington, the third spinner, comes on right at the end. Token gesture that. Not sure how I'd view that if I was in his shoes!

 

[USER1999]

At 4 o clock, I was going to have to decide whether to watch the cricket, or the golf.

Easy now. This won't get to 4 o clock.

Now need to decide what to watch between when this is over, and the golf starts.

 

[Kellfire]

Love it! Washington, the third spinner, comes on right at the end. Token gesture that. Not sure how I'd view that if I was in his shoes!

Yet the biased umpires didn’t give him a wicket for that first edge.

 

[SaintHacker]

Haha are you for real? There was clear distance and there was no sound until it hit pad. There’s only one side showing bias on this thread!

See post 568 ...

 

[Imurg]

Yet the biased umpires didn’t give him a wicket for that first edge.

Because nobody appealed.....

 

[Kellfire]

See post 568 ...

It’s weird that you’re being so insulting when I’m the one who seemingly has my eyesight working properly.

 

[Piece]

The noise that was just appearing as the ball was already well within the plane of the bat was the pad. The noise would’ve been earlier from the bat.

Some things aren’t opinions and the evidence showed that wasn’t nicked.

Consider the possibility that the ball feathered the bat and the pad at the same time. This has been proven before, in the same manner as the fore-shortening camera angle for catches that appear grounded that aren't.

 

[Kellfire]

Because nobody appealed.....

Should’ve walked. Honourable game, innit? ?

 

[Piece]

Yet the biased umpires didn’t give him a wicket for that first edge.

No appeal, no wicket....

 

[Kellfire]

Consider the possibility that the ball feathered the bat and the pad at the same time. This has been proven before, in the same manner as the fore-shortening camera angle for catches that appear grounded that aren't.

There was visible light between them. I wouldn’t even need snicko for that one, it was just the final proof for those denying the clear space.

 

[Imurg]

Should’ve walked. Honourable game, innit? ?

If the keeper didn't hear it its entirely possible the batsman didn't feel it.

 

[Piece]

There was visible light between them. I wouldn’t even need snicko for that one, it was just the final proof for those denying the clear space.

You must have a better TV that I have then.

 

[backwoodsman]

Well, that was a ****** shambles. Choose your own adjective.

 

[Kellfire]

You must have a better tele that I have then.

LG’s finest.

 

[Piece]

LG’s finest.

Then you don't

 

[Kellfire]

Then you don't

Haha, I bet I don’t, it went for a budget 4K model just to get more out of my Xbox.

 

[Piece]

Get men around the bat Rooty!

 

[Kellfire]

Gentleman’s agreement to skip the interval would’ve made sense here but I guess England want to regroup.

 

[Piece]

Haha, I bet I don’t, it went for a budget 4K model just to get more out of my Xbox.

Very low latency model I'd presume