DanFST
Head Pro
Enjoyable use of the scoreboard to cover up the man trying to flatten the turd of a wicket.
Blimey - it seems that when the English are batting the commentary team have forgotten about the pitch and it’s all about the ability of the Indian bowlers
They are as bias are the umpires
This will be done in two days - that’s an embarrassment
But those in the studio are only presenting to a UK audience.I don’t think they’re nearly as biased as you think they are. They favour their own team but you should try paying attention to the English pundits in the studio and tell me they’re not biased the other way.
Your logic is weird. It’s ok to be biased if you’re local but not if you’re international? I don’t agree. I also don’t mind commentators being invested in games, lends more passion to their involvement. But they’re really not as biased as you’re making out, I think you’re over egging that massively.But those in the studio are only presenting to a UK audience.
Those on live commentary are broadcasting the English language commentary worldwide.
Foaks will take it deep.. There should be some cricket tomorrow
I have not made any claims about the level of their bias, merely stated that when presenting to a global audience it is best if commentators display no bias.Your logic is weird. It’s ok to be biased if you’re local but not if you’re international? I don’t agree. I also don’t mind commentators being invested in games, lends more passion to their involvement. But they’re really not as biased as you’re making out, I think you’re over egging that massively.
If Archer's a no.8 then Glenn McGrath was up with Tendulkar.
I have just said the very same thing.4 no 11s was always a potential worry with this side, I guess less so on this track but Archer at 8 cant be a long term plan
Haha are you for real? There was clear distance and there was no sound until it hit pad. There’s only one side showing bias on this thread!Absolute joke of a decision, there's no way he can say that hasnt touched the bat. Cheats.
Absolute joke of a decision, there's no way he can say that hasnt touched the bat. Cheats.
He never touched it. There was visible space and no noise!Unfortunately the 3rd umpire hid behind the VAR-type, inclusive evidence of "clear and obvious error" to overturn. My view is that I think he feathered that and benefit should be to the bat.
Haha are you for real? There was clear distance and there was no sound until it hit pad. There’s only one side showing bias on this thread!
Grow up and discuss the matter at hand, Phil. As I’ve said to you before, play the ball, not the man.Are you on a mission to just disagree with everyone and provide the contrary view ? It’s almost like it’s deliberatly done to get a rise from people
He never touched it. There was visible space and no noise!