The Cricket Thread

Reemul

Head Pro
Joined
Sep 21, 2016
Messages
1,183
Location
Dorset
Visit site
I feel both are out. It's getting like the handball rule, I mean a catch should not touch the ground at all. Body in control and ball in control, what sort of rubbish is that. Ball not touchy groundy should be simple enough
 

Wilson

Head Pro
Joined
Oct 24, 2012
Messages
1,133
Visit site
I feel both are out. It's getting like the handball rule, I mean a catch should not touch the ground at all. Body in control and ball in control, what sort of rubbish is that. Ball not touchy groundy should be simple enough
Then the Starc catch isn’t out as he grounds it, what’s to say the ball wouldn’t have popped out had he had his hand under the ball.

I couldn’t believe the fuss when I saw the catch, clearly not out.
 

Billysboots

Falling apart at the seams
Moderator
Joined
Aug 25, 2009
Messages
7,368
Visit site
All this fuss seems to be ignoring one thing - Starc was exceptionally naive to even run the risk of breaching the rule to begin with.

I accept that many players will probably not know the rule word perfect, but I knew not to ground the ball during the act of catching it as a ten year old. He’s playing Ashes cricket for heaven’s sake.
 

Neilds

Assistant Pro
Joined
Feb 25, 2014
Messages
4,524
Location
Wiltshire
Visit site
All this talk of Bazball is distracting from the fact that England don’t have the bowlers to run through the Aussie batters. No one even around 90 mph, never mind with express pace and when there is no movement in the air, sadly Jimmy is a bit ordinary. Wood needs to be in for the next Test
 

Grizzly

Well-known member
Joined
Jan 13, 2019
Messages
763
Visit site
Brainless from Bairstow and classless from the Aussies.
Which is apposite as Jonny has never been known for his brains, nor the Aussies for their class. Considering it is at Lords, which is usually oh-so-polite at all times, that reaction was near to a riot.
 

Billysboots

Falling apart at the seams
Moderator
Joined
Aug 25, 2009
Messages
7,368
Visit site
Utterly classless from Australia. Bairstow very clearly regarded the ball as dead, the umpire at the bowler’s end wasn’t even looking, and appeared to be unclipping Green’s cap in readiness to return it to him.

Not the brightest cricket from Bairstow, it must be said, but my overwhelming impression is that such a dismissal simply isn’t in the spirit of the game.
 

AmandaJR

Money List Winner
Joined
Oct 26, 2011
Messages
13,336
Location
Cambs
Visit site
I've been playing tennis and just catching up in disbelief. I guess we can take heart that we've got them desperate...like that some old guy in the long room clearly calling them out.

With all that though Bairstow is a pratt.
 

TimShady

Well-known member
Banned
Joined
Jun 9, 2023
Messages
1,117
Visit site
Absolute nonsense to consider that dismissal of Bairstow anything other than a great bit of wicket keeping.

So when the batsman considers the ball dead, it is? Nope.
 

AmandaJR

Money List Winner
Joined
Oct 26, 2011
Messages
13,336
Location
Cambs
Visit site
Absolute nonsense to consider that dismissal of Bairstow anything other than a great bit of wicket keeping.

So when the batsman considers the ball dead, it is? Nope.

I'd hate it if we did it and then didn't take back the appeal. Clearly not trying to gain any advantage. Stupid of Bairstow, but feels wrong to me.
 

TimShady

Well-known member
Banned
Joined
Jun 9, 2023
Messages
1,117
Visit site
I'd hate it if we did it and then didn't take back the appeal. Clearly not trying to gain any advantage. Stupid of Bairstow, but feels wrong to me.

I always tie it back into golf… which rules do people ignore because they don’t like how they feel? It’s the old mankad argument all over again.

Bairstow had a brain fart and paid the price. I’ve done some keeping in my time and throwing the ball like that is a real skill.
 
Top