Grizzly
Well-known member
I do agree that there is a lot to be said for consistency of selection, but I don't think here we are talking about culling players for good so much as admitting a couple of errors and amending which XI is selected from within the core group of players. For me, Foakes has to come back in - Bairstow is not fit enough to keep and there is no point wrecking your key batsman - so one of the top three will have to make way. Whether it is Foakes, Stokes or even Ali (should he himself be fit) who perform a makeshift role in the top three, or whether everyone just moves up one spot, I don't think in the Bazball way really matters - it is simply about making sure that chances are taken.
And we did make enough chances to take 20 wickets - some of the criticism Jonny got was harsh (Foakes wouldn't have taken the one off Carey's bottom edge either) - but the fact is the missed stumping of Green was beyond routine and cost 50ish runs. Take that and keep Broads foot behind the line and it is a very different game. This will probably be the only game we go into with this attack anyway - Wood has to play at Lords because it is even more bland, and the tests now are so close together that no seamer on either side will play all four, even Cummins.
And we did make enough chances to take 20 wickets - some of the criticism Jonny got was harsh (Foakes wouldn't have taken the one off Carey's bottom edge either) - but the fact is the missed stumping of Green was beyond routine and cost 50ish runs. Take that and keep Broads foot behind the line and it is a very different game. This will probably be the only game we go into with this attack anyway - Wood has to play at Lords because it is even more bland, and the tests now are so close together that no seamer on either side will play all four, even Cummins.