SwingsitlikeHogan
Major Champion
My first post on these boards so hi all.
This post caught my attention as I have been having some 'discussions' let's call them with other members at my club about attending the flag.
The specific incident that gave rise to the discussion was in a four ball match One player of our opponents stood beside the flag - his partner played a shot from off the green. The flag was not removed, the ball hit the flag and dropped. I said nothing. As it happens we won the match.
When afterwards in the clubhouse I raised Note 1 of rule 17-1. I mentioned that according to the rules the guy standing beside the flag was deemed to be attending the flag - and should have removed it (after the ball was struck) and as the ball hit the flag - penalty. This did not go down well. Petty, pedantic, would be against the spirit etc. Besides - the point was made to me - was does 'near' mean. I couldn't say. My view was that if you were standing round about where you would if you were attending and going to remove the flag in the normal way - then that is 'near'. Anyway - consent was that I was daft - the rule was daft and not what it meant, and should be ignored. Hmmm - I play as best I can as closely as I can to the rules as I understand them - and if a partner or opponent doesn't know the rules that is not my problem Besides you can't just ignore rules - indeed the rules tell us that we CAN'T agree to ignore any rule.
So was I correct in all of the above - I know I don't have to call the penalty unless I want to - but if I am correct I don't like being treated as a pedantic pain. If I call a correct penalty - whether my opponent or playing partner likes it or not - I don't expect to be 'ridiculed' (that's perhaps harsh on the others - but how I felt)
Note 1: If the flagstick is in the hole and anyone stands near it while a stroke is being made, he is deemed to be attending the flagstick.
This post caught my attention as I have been having some 'discussions' let's call them with other members at my club about attending the flag.
The specific incident that gave rise to the discussion was in a four ball match One player of our opponents stood beside the flag - his partner played a shot from off the green. The flag was not removed, the ball hit the flag and dropped. I said nothing. As it happens we won the match.
When afterwards in the clubhouse I raised Note 1 of rule 17-1. I mentioned that according to the rules the guy standing beside the flag was deemed to be attending the flag - and should have removed it (after the ball was struck) and as the ball hit the flag - penalty. This did not go down well. Petty, pedantic, would be against the spirit etc. Besides - the point was made to me - was does 'near' mean. I couldn't say. My view was that if you were standing round about where you would if you were attending and going to remove the flag in the normal way - then that is 'near'. Anyway - consent was that I was daft - the rule was daft and not what it meant, and should be ignored. Hmmm - I play as best I can as closely as I can to the rules as I understand them - and if a partner or opponent doesn't know the rules that is not my problem Besides you can't just ignore rules - indeed the rules tell us that we CAN'T agree to ignore any rule.
So was I correct in all of the above - I know I don't have to call the penalty unless I want to - but if I am correct I don't like being treated as a pedantic pain. If I call a correct penalty - whether my opponent or playing partner likes it or not - I don't expect to be 'ridiculed' (that's perhaps harsh on the others - but how I felt)
Note 1: If the flagstick is in the hole and anyone stands near it while a stroke is being made, he is deemed to be attending the flagstick.