GB72
Money List Winner
Right or wrong (in this case wrong) it irritated me this morning so in the random irritations is goes
Being told by HR to take a post down on internal Teams where i said something about Beer challenge this weekend... apparently on the naughty step for promoting alcoholism!!!
…which would have been the case when Philadelphia was made and released in 1993 and so therefore not that many years after AIDS began to spread across the gay community. This film with Hanks in the lead playing the role superbly may well have made many change their views about gay men infected with AIDS because we should not forget the way that community were spoken about at the time, and how they were shunned by many.
Follow up to my earlier irritation about being rear-ended by a truck on the way to Gatwick last week...
We're back home and the courtesy car has been delivered.
It's a Vauxhall Grandland X.
What an utterly hateful vehicle.
what’s the challenge?
He was an appropriate lead for the time, but remember it is Hanks himself who thinks if the film was being made today he wouldn’t be the lead…but perhaps he knows areas that he was less strong in, or maybe he’d feel uncomfortable doing the lead knowing how many superbly capable gay actors there are today and the need for a household name to lead is not so necessary.You’ve kinda disproved your own position with this post, i.e. that Hanks as a non-gay played the part superbly Clearly indicates that a non-gay can understand and play the part well.
Have a think of all the films, pretty much every single film, in which an actor plays a part for which they have no real life experience.
I understand the logic but think you’re off the mark with it.
He was an appropriate lead for the time, but remember it is Hanks himself who thinks if the film was being made today he wouldn’t be the lead…but perhaps he knows areas that he was less strong in, or maybe he’d feel uncomfortable doing the lead knowing how many superbly capable gay actors there are today and the need for a household name to lead is not so necessary.
Is there a reason that we're using the term "non-gay" rather than straight?
Can I be randomly irritated that people are avoiding the use of the word straight for some reason?
You’re entitled to be irritated about anything. Personally, I don’t like the term straight. I feel that there is an underlying connotation that is derogatory to gays.
You’re entitled to be irritated about anything. Personally, I don’t like the term straight. I feel that there is an underlying connotation that is derogatory to gays.
Why can’t we just be people ?
Because that's not allowed anymore. You have to have a label.