Molinari DQ

So a Caddie has a major fall out with his boss midway through a round- "I know i'll hitch a lift behind his back, get the (mod Edit) disqualified hehehe, i'm so devious, ditching him anyway"

And never gets another job! Very sensible! :rolleyes:
 
Last edited by a moderator:
How many golfers actually play in the sort of competition that has a transport Condition of Competition?
It will make no difference to the world of ordinary golf. Will you stop playing as a result?

Golfers will just shake their heads and get on with it as a quirk. It is the perception to non golfers that matters. They are the potential golfers who can be slightly intimidated by the mryiad of odd rules that they fear falling foul of. It is the drip drip effect.
 
Harsh....Yes, but the rules are the rules. If his caddie has messed up then he needs to hire a caddie that knows them, especially the ones that affect him. Im not saying he should be a rules guru, but if a rule is specifically affects a caddies actions and what he can do during a round then he should know them at least.
 
Golfers will just shake their heads and get on with it as a quirk. It is the perception to non golfers that matters. They are the potential golfers who can be slightly intimidated by the mryiad of odd rules that they fear falling foul of. It is the drip drip effect.

I'm a golfer and this had completely passed me by until I saw this thread so I doubt many non-golfers will have noticed it.

To me the rules are the rules and if you want to enter a competition then they have to be followed.
With many years of continuous and ongoing editing, I don't think we can ask for much more really.
 
Never understand these type of comments. Every rule has a purpose as all eventualities need to be covered. The one being questioned here relates to caddies, so you would have thought he would have known it.

Disqualifying a player because he didnt know his caddie took a short ride on a cart.....how very Draconian. What purpose does that serve other than showing that golf, in some respects, still resides in the past?
 
Disqualifying a player because he didnt know his caddie took a short ride on a cart.....how very Draconian. What purpose does that serve other than showing that golf, in some respects, still resides in the past?

There weren't any buggies in the past. This COC is relatively recent and resides in the present.
 
And other caddies might feel he gained an unfair advantage. It's his job, he should know the rules.

What advantage does Molinari gain from his caddie hitching a ride? And i'm talking a genuine, significant advantage that would greatly effect Molinari's performance rather than a perceived, pedantic equivalent. (i.e the caddie will have saved an iota of energy by not walking those few yards)
 
but they get in a cart on a play off , when time constraints exist , i.e daylight hours or tv schedules . Ive never heard of a ruling like this . I can also recall a player being taken back to the tee in a cart after his ball could not be found ,to play 3 off the tee , that may have also been a play off though
 
What advantage does Molinari gain from his caddie hitching a ride? And i'm talking a genuine, significant advantage that would greatly effect Molinari's performance rather than a perceived, pedantic equivalent. (i.e the caddie will have saved an iota of energy by not walking those few yards)

What advantage would Molinari have got if he had accidentally knocked his ball back 1/4" into a divot hole? You can't break a rule 'a little bit'. You either have or haven't.
 
What advantage does Molinari gain from his caddie hitching a ride? And i'm talking a genuine, significant advantage that would greatly effect Molinari's performance rather than a perceived, pedantic equivalent. (i.e the caddie will have saved an iota of energy by not walking those few yards)
Caddie who's player lost by 1 shot might have a view. Having heaved a tour bag a ride on a buggie no matter how short the ride would save me a major heart attack :lol:
 
What advantage would Molinari have got if he had accidentally knocked his ball back 1/4" into a divot hole? You can't break a rule 'a little bit'. You either have or haven't.

As was highlighted earlier, i'm not questioning the implementation of the rule, rather the daft nature of the rule itself.
 
The residing in the past reference was regarding the attitude and the ethos of the rule rather than the rule itself.

What exactly is the "attitude and ethos" of a rule? It doesn't make any sense to me.

As was highlighted earlier, i'm not questioning the implementation of the rule, rather the daft nature of the rule itself.

It would be interesting to hear an argument as to why it is daft, rather than just an assertion. A good start would be an explanation of why it is daft to prevent a tournament grinding to a halt because of a traffic gridlock. There are, I think, around 156 players in the first round of the Open. Without that COC, you could have 156 carts on the course.
 
Top