USER1999
Grand Slam Winner
The same 40 year olds who are no longer good enough to play on the Tour still play in The Open every year if they're a past champion. It doesn't bother me that The Masters is slightly more exclusive, if anything it makes it more special. Sure there are some older guys that probably shouldn't be playing, but we have that at every major, that doesn't take away from the field strength. All of the best players in the world make it to The Masters - 56 fewer play than play at the other Majors, but is that really a big issue? Who is missing out that should be there? It's not like politics of the invitational are getting in the way of the best players in the world competing for one of the 4 Majors - all the top players are there. Total non-issue for me.
Who is missing out? May be the next John Daly at the Open in '95. He wasnt in the top 50, etc etc. Sometimes outsiders provide the excitement at a major.
Can a short hitter still win at Augusta after all the recent lengthening? I think it is less likely now. Year on year, I think it now favours a bomber. The days of Weir, Zac, etc winning I think have gone. Some of the par 4s are now silly long.
There are so many things wrong with the Masters, in terms of stuffiness, but it won't change anytime soon, which is a shame, as it could be so much better.