No. Rahm, like Smith, is in his prime. Its just most of the others who are past it. McDowell, Poulter, Schwartzl, etc.Come on anti Liver's, if Rahm goes it's because he is past it, like all the others.
No. Rahm, like Smith, is in his prime. Its just most of the others who are past it. McDowell, Poulter, Schwartzl, etc.Come on anti Liver's, if Rahm goes it's because he is past it, like all the others.
Aside from the Rahm speculation Puig has gone to the Fireballs with Ortiz going the other way to Torque -
Makes the Fireballs a young team but a massive amount of potential there - one for the Spaniards to fully embrace now as a national team.
Promotions event starts on Friday - I'm looking forward to following it over the weekend to see who makes it to LIV 2024 - potentially a life changing opportunity for a some players.
National teams element is a nonsense. Such groupings are meaningless when the best arent there. A UK team would be McIlroy, Fitzpatrick, Hatton, and Fleetwood. If none of those are in it, let alone all, then who wants to support the UK D-Team for example. It’s he same could be saas fake as Bryson 'celebrating' winning the team thing.
The same could be said of every team & individual competition, in whatever sport, ever ran. How many debates have we seen about Ryder Cup selections and wild card picks? And then there’s numerous Masters, by invitation only, that have courted controversy. Was every competition after Tiger Woods injuries started coming to the fore a nonsense?
As for Gareth Southgate’s team selections… Will Farrell’s inclusion in England’s team at the rugby World Cup, and Ben Stokes playing in the World Cup in India when he was clearly too crocked to bowl and struggled for quick runs.
A team of nationals, not a national team, will spark interest, and in some countries more than others. Just because it’s a nonsense to you doesn’t make it a nonsense to the next man. If the team element flops, so what, at least something new was tried in this fuddy duddy, sport. If it succeeds, the sport as a whole benefits.
When I first read that I had images of Elf on the rugby field
These were officially announced yesterday.Aside from the Rahm speculation Puig has gone to the Fireballs with Ortiz going the other way to Torque -
It couldnt, because there is no debate that a LIV team of UK players would not be its strongest. Debate might be over 11th or 12 on the Ryder Cup, but differences are small. Those missing out are close to making it. Poulter is a million miles from Hatton at this stage.The same could be said of every team & individual competition, in whatever sport, ever ran. How many debates have we seen about Ryder Cup selections and wild card picks? And then there’s numerous Masters, by invitation only, that have courted controversy. Was every competition after Tiger Woods injuries started coming to the fore a nonsense?
As for Gareth Southgate’s team selections… Will Farrell’s inclusion in England’s team at the rugby World Cup, and Ben Stokes playing in the World Cup in India when he was clearly too crocked to bowl and struggled for quick runs.
A team of nationals, not a national team, will spark interest, and in some countries more than others. Just because it’s a nonsense to you doesn’t make it a nonsense to the next man. If the team element flops, so what, at least something new was tried in this fuddy duddy, sport. If it succeeds, the sport as a whole benefits.
Edit: should read Owen Farrell but a bit of levity in the thread won’t do any harm.
It couldnt, because there is no debate that a LIV team of UK players would not be its strongest. Debate might be over 11th or 12 on the Ryder Cup, but differences are small. Those missing out are close to making it. Poulter is a million miles from Hatton at this stage.
I'm not for or against LIV. I don't really care that much about pro golf.
I've just listened to the Rick Shiels podcast with Bryson DC. It was quite an interesting listen - he was very open about all aspects and I've come away from it quite liking him, which I didn't before.
These were officially announced yesterday.
If that's the case, if McIlroy ever joins LIV, I bet you'll have a bedroom covers in Rory posters and Rory McIlroy bed sheetsI couldn’t stand BDC - always enjoyed seeing him fail - how poor is that? But since his switch to LIV, and him gaining the freedom to control his own media output - I’ve done a full 180 on him. One of my favourite players in the golfing world right now - he’s working hard to develop both his team on LIV, as well as his own business interests.
Was absolutely chuffed for him when he rolled the putt in for the 58 earlier this year.
If that's the case, if McIlroy ever joins LIV, I bet you'll have a bedroom covers in Rory posters and Rory McIlroy bed sheets
I wasn't a fan of Bryson, although he grew on me when he started hitting the ball a million miles. I just liked that he was trying something different, added variation and a bit more excitement to the game. Was probably more disappointed to see him join LIV than any of the others.
No, they really aren't.Post #14257.;-)
There is some great LIV info out there if you know where to find it….
These guys are worth a listen..
Golf Lovers United • Best LIV Golf Podcast • PGA Podcast
The best golf podcast for fans across the globe. A platform that fairly discusses the PGA Tour, LIV Golf, LPGA and more.www.glugc.com
in what way?Rory lacks class mate. Doesn’t mean I don’t like to see him performing well but even if he was a LIV player I’d find his divisive outbursts tiresome.