Swango1980
Well-known member
But we know the issue with LIV golfers and the OWGR, it isn't like anyone is trying to fool anyone. They are not getting points as they are pretty much unrankable. I suppose the OWGR could have just removed them from the rankings altogether, but I bet that would have caused a bigger uproar. So, they just left them in there and 100% of us knew they'd fall down the rankings as time went on.Bland is 251st on the OWGR, so I don't think questioning the credibility of either of Datagolf or TUGR on a 27 place differential is much of a discussion to be having in the grand scheme of things, when the 'Official' ranking is clearly miles away from being accurate.
All the other players you have carefully selected are probably accurately ranked. Obviously playing less now than they were - Kaymer has hardly played due to injury - but generally their best days are definitely behind them.
We know most of them were signed for their status within the game rather than their ability to win tournaments - all part of the business model - the same applies to Tiger's relevance to the PGAT these days right?
There are still plenty of quality golfers within the LIV roster suggest the golf being played is of a high quality. Using TUGR as an example, approximately one quarter of the top 100 golfers in the world are playing on LIV.
However, using the rankings you like, LIV don't even have a top 10 golfer, and only one in the top 20, and 3 in the top 30. That is pretty poor, compared to the PGAT.
And who cares about the Top 100? Even with the OWGR, there are plenty of golfers in the Top 100 that don't exactly create an excitement amongst fans, and are unlikely to do do much damage in the tournament. I mean, they are clearly good golfers, but they are a mile away from the McIlroys, Schefflers, Rahms of this world.
Rankings are only of importance for Major qualification anyway, is that normally Top 50? Of the 23 LIV golfers in the Top 100, only 8 are in the Top 50.