LIV Golf

Swango1980

Well-known member
Joined
Jul 22, 2019
Messages
12,695
Location
Lincolnshire
Visit site
Bland is 251st on the OWGR, so I don't think questioning the credibility of either of Datagolf or TUGR on a 27 place differential is much of a discussion to be having in the grand scheme of things, when the 'Official' ranking is clearly miles away from being accurate.

All the other players you have carefully selected are probably accurately ranked. Obviously playing less now than they were - Kaymer has hardly played due to injury - but generally their best days are definitely behind them.
We know most of them were signed for their status within the game rather than their ability to win tournaments - all part of the business model - the same applies to Tiger's relevance to the PGAT these days right?

There are still plenty of quality golfers within the LIV roster suggest the golf being played is of a high quality. Using TUGR as an example, approximately one quarter of the top 100 golfers in the world are playing on LIV.
But we know the issue with LIV golfers and the OWGR, it isn't like anyone is trying to fool anyone. They are not getting points as they are pretty much unrankable. I suppose the OWGR could have just removed them from the rankings altogether, but I bet that would have caused a bigger uproar. So, they just left them in there and 100% of us knew they'd fall down the rankings as time went on.

However, using the rankings you like, LIV don't even have a top 10 golfer, and only one in the top 20, and 3 in the top 30. That is pretty poor, compared to the PGAT.

And who cares about the Top 100? Even with the OWGR, there are plenty of golfers in the Top 100 that don't exactly create an excitement amongst fans, and are unlikely to do do much damage in the tournament. I mean, they are clearly good golfers, but they are a mile away from the McIlroys, Schefflers, Rahms of this world.

Rankings are only of importance for Major qualification anyway, is that normally Top 50? Of the 23 LIV golfers in the Top 100, only 8 are in the Top 50.
 

Swango1980

Well-known member
Joined
Jul 22, 2019
Messages
12,695
Location
Lincolnshire
Visit site
That can't be right. I read an interview yesterday with Gooch where he said he was probably the best golfer in the world right now. So should probably add Gooch rating 1st.
I'm guessing he confused himself with a 1980's Graham Gooch, and meant he felt he was the best batter in Test Cricket right now.

These LIV golfers are living in a bit of a dream world at the moment, so probably best not to pay too much attention to what they say. Just let them enjoy their cash and play a bit of friendly, stress free golf every now and then :)
 

Swango1980

Well-known member
Joined
Jul 22, 2019
Messages
12,695
Location
Lincolnshire
Visit site
Just saw the latest WAGR and I am outraged at the way I’m tumbling down the rankings. OK I haven’t played any ranking events since July but I can’t understand why the events I do play aren’t rated. I mean, I won the scratch at the October medal with a pretty sporty nine-over 82. No points for that!!!?? It’s all a stitch up to keep rubbish middle aged Scottish players out of the ANWA.

A disgrace I tell you, a disgrace! Is the WAGR even relevant nowadays?

😜
Na, the LIV golfers / fans demand it, only because it is comforting for them to know that Lee Westwood is the 411th best golfer in the world.

I mean, I'd love to know where I stand, after you take my club monthly medal gross scores into account. But I also accept it is difficult to do officially. But, if anybody wants to create an unofficial ranking list for a laugh, that includes me, it would be interesting if nothing else.
 

wjemather

Well-known member
Joined
Dec 3, 2020
Messages
3,862
Location
Bristol
Visit site
Rankings are only of importance for Major qualification anyway, is that normally Top 50? Of the 23 LIV golfers in the Top 100, only 8 are in the Top 50.
Why do you insist on guessing when it's extremely easy to look these things up? Top-50 are exempt into the Masters and The Open; top-60 into the US Open; and the top-100 usually get invited to the PGA.
 

LincolnShep

Head Pro
Joined
Jun 16, 2015
Messages
1,072
Visit site
Non of us know how Bland is playing compared to the other 2000 Pro's who play compete in OWGR approved events, whilst he choosed to be a member of a closed shop tour.
Backsticks knows - he assessed Bland's performance in an earlier post.
I agree with you though, it's a massive disappointment that OWGR no longer gives us a tool to assess all pro golfers.
 

PJ87

Journeyman Pro
Joined
Apr 1, 2016
Messages
21,870
Location
Havering
Visit site
I listened to Rick shiels podcast yesterday, co host guy raised this

He caveated he isn't a fan of Liv however went on to raise this point being raised today about the rankings. Does make a bit of a mockery of the system if your saying the rankings don't include Liv etc. They put it better than I can so worth the listen for that section

But raised the point about data rankings being more form based, brooks is actually lower than his official ranking as his form dipped after winning his major

He did also go onto say if your saying their are 100 better golfers on form right now than Bryson, Gooch it is a bit mental considering they are still playing good golf.

By all means weight it heavily against Liv but no Rankings seems mad

I'll see if they clipped the rankings bit on YouTube because I found it an interesting listen .. better than I've said it anyways
 

Swango1980

Well-known member
Joined
Jul 22, 2019
Messages
12,695
Location
Lincolnshire
Visit site
Why do you insist on guessing when it's extremely easy to look these things up? Top-50 are exempt into the Masters and The Open; top-60 into the US Open; and the top-100 usually get invited to the PGA.
I didn't guess, hence the ?. That implies it was a question, which you have answered. Much appreciated, and saved me the time from having to research it myself
 

Backsticks

Assistant Pro
Banned
Joined
Aug 7, 2012
Messages
3,852
Visit site
I listened to Rick shiels podcast yesterday, co host guy raised this

He caveated he isn't a fan of Liv however went on to raise this point being raised today about the rankings. Does make a bit of a mockery of the system if your saying the rankings don't include Liv etc. They put it better than I can so worth the listen for that section

But raised the point about data rankings being more form based, brooks is actually lower than his official ranking as his form dipped after winning his major

He did also go onto say if your saying their are 100 better golfers on form right now than Bryson, Gooch it is a bit mental considering they are still playing good golf.

By all means weight it heavily against Liv but no Rankings seems mad

I'll see if they clipped the rankings bit on YouTube because I found it an interesting listen .. better than I've said it anyways
It isnt mad. If you arent putting yourself uo against others in the rankings, well of course you cannot be rated.

Extend the LIV principal further : Say McIlroy, Scheffler, and Rahm quit the existing tours, and started their own 3 man one. Playing 3 man tournaments around the world, 72 holes, even a cut after 36, where the last man doesnt play the weekend, and doesnt earn a penny, and the other two fight it out for millions. They are still the best 3 golfers in the world.
Should they get ranking points that reflect that, to keep them at the top of the OWGR ? LIV golfers would support them getting big points that would ensure that I guess ?
 

Mel Smooth

Hacker
Joined
May 4, 2017
Messages
4,677
Visit site
Na, the LIV golfers / fans demand it, only because it is comforting for them to know that Lee Westwood is the 411th best golfer in the world.

I mean, I'd love to know where I stand, after you take my club monthly medal gross scores into account. But I also accept it is difficult to do officially. But, if anybody wants to create an unofficial ranking list for a laugh, that includes me, it would be interesting if nothing else.

I appreciate you're having to resort to peurile comments to try and drag the debate off tangent, but if you go on England Golf, you'll see where you are ranked as a percentage, at club, county and national level.

So, if you do really want to know where you stand, you can. (y)


I've put the boys here cos he's lower than me.. 🧐ranking.jpg
 

Swango1980

Well-known member
Joined
Jul 22, 2019
Messages
12,695
Location
Lincolnshire
Visit site
I appreciate you're having to resort to peurile comments to try and drag the debate off tangent, but if you go on England Golf, you'll see where you are ranked as a percentage, at club, county and national level.

So, if you do really want to know where you stand, you can. (y)


I've put the boys here cos he's lower than me.. 🧐View attachment 50014
That doesn't rank me. Am I the 400,321st best golfer in the UK, or 400,322nd. And what about my world rank?

I'm sure the LIV golfers can rank themselves quite easily amongst themselves, but it is a world rank they want.
 

Mel Smooth

Hacker
Joined
May 4, 2017
Messages
4,677
Visit site
That doesn't rank me. Am I the 400,321st best golfer in the UK, or 400,322nd. And what about my world rank?

I'm sure the LIV golfers can rank themselves quite easily amongst themselves, but it is a world rank they want.

You're not a proffesional golfer. LIV players are. Move on, this debate is tiresome and going nowhere.
 
Top