SurreyGolfer
Active member
As a relative newcomer who as yet hasn't plucked up the courage to enter any competitions (lucky to have some good, honest, rule abiding PP's) , and actually is a little nervous re H4H in October(!), this thread is interesting. I'm a (very) high handicapper playing off 23, but it's come down from 31 at the start of the year. If I entered a comp tomorrow I reckon I could hit anywhere between 5 or 6 under my handicap and up to about 10 over, depending on all sorts of factors.
If I shot 5 under handicap in a comp tomorrow, judging from this thread there is a fair chance I'd at best be called a bandit, at worst potentially get into a verbal argument with an opponent who might accuse me of cheating. Why is it rarer for people to recognise that 1) High handicappers probably have a higher 'score dispersion' than low handicappers, and 2) people have lessons, work hard to improve but there's always going to be a slight lag with the WHS catching up?
Assuming they aren't dropping balls and cheating, surely it's a case of play the person, play the handicap, and whatever happens shake hands at the end?
If I shot 5 under handicap in a comp tomorrow, judging from this thread there is a fair chance I'd at best be called a bandit, at worst potentially get into a verbal argument with an opponent who might accuse me of cheating. Why is it rarer for people to recognise that 1) High handicappers probably have a higher 'score dispersion' than low handicappers, and 2) people have lessons, work hard to improve but there's always going to be a slight lag with the WHS catching up?
Assuming they aren't dropping balls and cheating, surely it's a case of play the person, play the handicap, and whatever happens shake hands at the end?