Neilds
Assistant Pro
Might be being a bit flippant here but if players no longer ‘get shots’, what do they take off players in the monthly medal to see who wins?
Of course. CONGU 'unified' England, Scotland, Wales, Ireland & the LGU.No, not universal - Unified
Players do "get shots" when playing with and against each other. That is the purpose of handicaps.Might be being a bit flippant here but if players no longer ‘get shots’, what do they take off players in the monthly medal to see who wins?
What did the U stand for in the previous handicap system - UHS?
Out of interest, what were the exceptions?Unified
as it amalgamated the the different systems used in the UK (with some exceptions)
What was it called before it was unified? I assume the unification was just the CONGU countries that became unified.Unified
as it amalgamated the the different systems used in the UK (with some exceptions)
1) It wasn'tWhat was it called before it was unified? I assume the unification was just the CONGU countries that became unified.
Out of interest, what were the exceptions?
What was it called before it was unified? I assume the unification was just the CONGU countries that became unified.
I did but could find no exceptions to the membership. ie The 4 men's unions and the LGU and ultimately the ladies' associations that hadn't merged with the men's unions. What exceptions would there be?Seriously
I would suggest reading the manual.
What was it called before it was unified? I assume the unification was just the CONGU countries that became unified.
without going through the whole manualI did but could find no exceptions to the membership. ie The 4 men's unions and the LGU and ultimately the ladies' associations that hadn't merged with the men's unions. What exceptions would there be?
Ok, I see what you mean. Local variations of the rules. I took it that you were talking about some countries being exceptions to affiliation.without going through the whole manual
Directions and Delegations
There are a number of clauses in the CONGU® Unified Handicapping System that each Union has to interpret and provide direction for Area Authorities and member clubs, including delegation of authority where appropriate. The clause numbers of such discretions, directions and delegations are shaded for ease of identification e.g. 9.3
The directions for each of the GB&I countries are shown following each clause. Overseas Affiliates should make their own directions for these clauses, where appropriate.
Ok, I see what you mean. Local variations of the rules. I took it that you were talking about some countries being exceptions to affiliation.
If it's so boring why bother reading it.Thread destruction complete
Par itself tells you nothing about relative or actual difficulty. It is simple the sum of the pars allocated to individual holes. The problem is that an 18 hole par 72 could be 18 holes of 490 yards (ie 8820 yards) or 18 holes of 240 yards (ie 4320 yards).CR and Slope - are some courses harder than others? And other course difficulty discussion
I am fairly certain that the theory behind CR and Slope is to make all courses the same degree of difficulty so that players who play at differing courses should have comparable handicaps.
I am fairly uncertain that there is a different theoretical purpose to CR and Slope than this.
But we are all differing types of golfer with regards to our strengths and weaknesses and our personal experience of courses will vary from the given CR and Slope.
Even at my home course I find the Yellow Tee CR and Slope makes it more difficult for me to achieve desirable Score Differentials than play from the White Tees.
Other players at my club may have a different view and/or experience.
High CR and high Slope does not make me think immediately that the course is difficult.
I played such a course one time recent years and my score of 10-over par gave me a Score Differential of 5.6. (There was no adjustment to my gross score)
If I played there regularly I don't think my HI would be very different from what it is right now. But others might have a different view or personal experience.
At my course from the yellow tees a score of 5-over par gives a Score Differential of 5.2. Painswick yellow tees and 2-over par gives a SD of 5.5.
I find both these courses more difficult than the course with a high CR and high Slope.
2-over par at one course and you've played to about the same handicap as 10-over par at another course. That is the theory of CR and Slope.
The theory behind CR and S is not to make all courses the same degree of difficulty. It is to make competition between hc golfers on a given course equal, and comoetition between golfers with hcs from different courses, equal. It is a rebalancing of relative difficulties.CR and Slope - are some courses harder than others? And other course difficulty discussion
I am fairly certain that the theory behind CR and Slope is to make all courses the same degree of difficulty so that players who play at differing courses should have comparable handicaps.
I am fairly uncertain that there is a different theoretical purpose to CR and Slope than this.
But we are all differing types of golfer with regards to our strengths and weaknesses and our personal experience of courses will vary from the given CR and Slope.
Even at my home course I find the Yellow Tee CR and Slope makes it more difficult for me to achieve desirable Score Differentials than play from the White Tees.
Other players at my club may have a different view and/or experience.
High CR and high Slope does not make me think immediately that the course is difficult.
I played such a course one time recent years and my score of 10-over par gave me a Score Differential of 5.6. (There was no adjustment to my gross score)
If I played there regularly I don't think my HI would be very different from what it is right now. But others might have a different view or personal experience.
At my course from the yellow tees a score of 5-over par gives a Score Differential of 5.2. Painswick yellow tees and 2-over par gives a SD of 5.5.
I find both these courses more difficult than the course with a high CR and high Slope.
2-over par at one course and you've played to about the same handicap as 10-over par at another course. That is the theory of CR and Slope.
But they are, in theory at least, presenting each golfer with an equal degree of difficulty of achieving the same SD or "what I played to" score.The theory behind CR and S is not to make all courses the same degree of difficulty. It is to make competition between hc golfers on a given course equal, and comoetition between golfers with hcs from different courses, equal. It is a rebalancing of relative difficulties.
Courses are, objectively, certainly not all of equal difficulty.