Imurg
The Grinder Of Pars (Semi Crocked)
We're talking about the players.....Cool, so why wasn't it free to air on the BBC then, like the good old days..?
We're talking about the players.....Cool, so why wasn't it free to air on the BBC then, like the good old days..?
The BBC don’t give a stuff about itCool, so why wasn't it free to air on the BBC then, like the good old days..?
Think it's the WAGS.Is that a group we should know, or is Victor just popular with the laaaadieees ?
Play for the love of it or not at all for me. I very much doubt any of them are out of pocket for the week.
That’s exactly it. Caddies get a nominal fee too. But as with players, all expenses met.Exactly, I bet every expense for flying their families and putting them in hotels was met, they wouldn’t have to pay a penny. Surely most are happy just to represent their country for pride. No need to get paid for everything.
We're talking about the players.....
Does Sport England via lottery funding not actually pay players/sports for success (in terms of medals) at the Olympic?You must really hate that people don’t get paid to go to the Olympics then.
I know, what's the validifcation for not offering them some remuneration for their services?
I don't really know, I would guess the easy answer is tradition, but in this day and age where everything seems to revolve around getting even more money, it is refreshing that these professionals put everything on the line for pride.Apparently the revenues from the Ryder Cup are around 500 million dollars (see posts on the price of drinks), all the people organising etc. are being paid - is there a reason why players aren’t getting even a very small slice? Unless of course everyone does it for free and all the 500 milllion dollars goes to charity.
Any payment would sully the Ryder Cup. If you can't see that, you don't really understand golf.
That for some people the - ask not what your country can do for you but what you can do for your country - spirit exists, and representing your family, country, and continent is sufficient in itself, and for 1 week in 104, very rich men are desperately willing to engage with and be part of such an event, and not count the greenbacks.I know, what's the validifcation for not offering them some remuneration for their services?
It was a really good thread for three days and more, but it appears to have been a bit too nice on here for you, not enough needle.Would it really?
Can you explain your logic, when the event is generating half a billion dollars - a third of the PGA Tours annual revenue - in just one weekend..
How would paying the players a nominal fee for taking part damage the reputation of the event?
It was a really good thread for three days and more, but it appears to have been a bit too nice on here for you, not enough needle.
Well you win, I'm out.
Sometimes golf is just better when the players are playing for something other that money. Possibly why amateurs aren't supposed to play for cash.Would it really?
Can you explain your logic, when the event is generating half a billion dollars - a third of the PGA Tours annual revenue - in just one weekend..
How would paying the players a nominal fee for taking part damage the reputation of the event?
Would it really?
Can you explain your logic, when the event is generating half a billion dollars - a third of the PGA Tours annual revenue - in just one weekend..
How would paying the players a nominal fee for taking part damage the reputation of the event?
What actually is the point for paying a nominal amount. I think it's a bit shallow but each to their own I supposeWould it really?
Can you explain your logic, when the event is generating half a billion dollars - a third of the PGA Tours annual revenue - in just one weekend..
How would paying the players a nominal fee for taking part damage the reputation of the event?