gmhubble
Head Pro
Westwood - already backing him for the Open - have a funny feeling ala Darren Clarke
Personally, I'd set a criteria as someone having played at least 20,30 or even 40 majors, as they would have had approx. 5-8 years at it, if they didn't miss many.
+1 for this. I might put £10 on him.Westwood - already backing him for the Open - have a funny feeling ala Darren Clarke
Some of the names mentioned haven't been around long enough for me, Fowler being the clear one who should be winning one soon.
I did think of some of the older Americans, Kuchar, Snedeker for example but then I don't think they have genuinely contended often enough in the majors. As Alliss said last night, "the cash machine that is Matt Kuchar", but he doesn't really threaten in those elite tournaments.
Yup, Westwood for me
Some of the names mentioned haven't been around long enough for me, Fowler being the clear one who should be winning one soon.
I did think of some of the older Americans, Kuchar, Snedeker for example but then I don't think they have genuinely contended often enough in the majors. As Alliss said last night, "the cash machine that is Matt Kuchar", but he doesn't really threaten in those elite tournaments.
Yup, Westwood for me
Interesting reading looking back through the thread - especially the bottle comments
Still Fowler as the best player to not win a major