• We'd like to take this opportunity to wish you a Happy Holidays and a very Merry Christmas from all at Golf Monthly. Thank you for sharing your 2025 with us!

LIV Golf

Why is no one fighting for fair payment for all of the marshals?
 
Just to highlight how much these guys have to lay out each week…

In 2018 so pre-covid, number 200 in the world, Parker McLachlin, entered 11 tournaments, he made $174,039 in the year. 11 tournaments at $6k as above would still mean he was clearing $108k in the year. Which while is nothing compared to the guys in the top 10 is still a pretty healthy income. Bearing in mind there is a good chance he would sponsorship as well which would go some way to cover the costs of travel and accomodation etc.

On the small tours, it is very tough to make a living. Pros at my old clubs played on small European tours and they would care share and split petrol as it was cheaper that flying, rent a house usually with not enough rooms so some would be sleeping on the floor. But if you get a PGA Tour Card you should still be making money
 
The small tours arent really a career thing though, and making a living on them is not the goal. They are a learning, and filtering and proving ground, more akin to an apprentiship gateway to the real tour. Covering your expenses for a few years to see have you got what it takes to move to the big time is OK.
 
In 2018 so pre-covid, number 200 in the world, Parker McLachlin, entered 11 tournaments, he made $174,039 in the year. 11 tournaments at $6k as above would still mean he was clearing $108k in the year. Which while is nothing compared to the guys in the top 10 is still a pretty healthy income. Bearing in mind there is a good chance he would sponsorship as well which would go some way to cover the costs of travel and accomodation etc.

On the small tours, it is very tough to make a living. Pros at my old clubs played on small European tours and they would care share and split petrol as it was cheaper that flying, rent a house usually with not enough rooms so some would be sleeping on the floor. But if you get a PGA Tour Card you should still be making money
There would have been a few other expenses in there also - caddy likely 11k (likely more these days) + 18K winnings share for example. 200 OWGR is also quite a high ranking, though I can't say I've ever heard of him. Eduardo Molinari a fairly consistent top 25-ish in tournaments (T24 in Irish Open) is 232; brother Francisco is 179; Harrington is 194; Jamie Donaldson is 208
 
They should get paid because they are part of the event, one which generates millions of dollars of revenue, they are part of the reason you can wave the OWGR flag that you seem hung up on….
You’ll quite happily stand by the 72 hole criteria for the points ranking, but the lads that get chopped after two days don’t deserve a penny for their contribution?

As you and others have endlessly repeated, the players are independent contractors, so they contracted for that arrangement of missed cut, no money. As well as caddies, the coaches, physios, golf psychologists etc etc are also independent contractors to the players. Should they all get paid by the PGA Tour too?

Interestingly, when the PGA Tour went to their all-exempt Tour a couple of decades ago, which guaranteed more starts for players finishing lower down the money list, players like Nicklaus noted that this was against the spirit of competitive sport and would lead to complacency and mediocrity. The LIV Tour seems to rejoice in encouraging both.
 
Last edited:
As you and others have endlessly repeated, they are independent contractors, so they contracted for that arrangement. As well as caddies, the coaches, physios, golf psychologists etc etc are also independent contractors to the players. Should they all get paid by the PGA Tour too?
So you agree they are independent contractors ?
 
The same could be argued for the golf majors (well the Open and US Open) then? Local and regional qualifiers etc.
Agreed. And in Golf's case, the professional players don't get paid until the make the cut of the main tournament - at least as far as I know. Amateurs can earn up to $1000 dollars (deemed allowable expenses) these days, but, again, I don't believe that's on offer for The Open.
 
As you and others have endlessly repeated, they are independent contractors, so they contracted for that arrangement. As well as caddies, the coaches, physios, golf psychologists etc etc are also independent contractors to the players. Should they all get paid by the PGA Tour too?
I'm not sure they are ALL independent contractors...they might be simply providing an extension of their existing service, however that is set up. Physio(s), for example, could well actually be provided/made available by PGAT or Tournament, with a 'usage' fee paid by player - or as per the physio's normal practice.
There are certainly dedicated ATP/WTA physios at Wimbledon.
 
Last edited:
$53,000 to get knocked out in Wimbledon Rd 1

£20,000 to get knocked out of snooker world champs, rd 1

£7,500 to get knocked out of darts world champs, rd 1
In all events their are qualifying rounds where loser do not get paid.

LIV are paying 48 players and their caddies, for a max weeks of the year. PGA tour pays over 60 players for 48 weeks of the year. Plus a similar number through it's feeder tour That's without the other tours which make up the current international golf calender.
These all have to abide by commercial realities which LIV does not appear to have intention of doing.

Seems to me that LIV supporters are happy for it to break PGA and leave professional golf with just the same 48 players for 14 annual events.
 
I'm not sure they are ALL independent contractors...they might be simply providing an extension of their existing service, however that is set up. Physio(s), for example, could well actually be provided/made available by PGAT or Tournament, with a 'usage' fee paid by player - or as per the physio's normal practice.

I expect that golf coaches etc are paid on a retainer or hours worked basis by the player. They aren't paid by the PGA Tour. Some events have on site physios etc but they aren't part pf the travelling circus.
 
In all events their are qualifying rounds where loser do not get paid.

LIV are paying 48 players and their caddies, for a max weeks of the year. PGA tour pays over 60 players for 48 weeks of the year. Plus a similar number through it's feeder tour That's without the other tours which make up the current international golf calender.
These all have to abide by commercial realities which LIV does not appear to have intention of doing.

Seems to me that LIV supporters are happy for it to break PGA and leave professional golf with just the same 48 players for 14 annual events.
I don't think LIV or its supporters have any intention of looking to break the PGA, ideally they would co-exist. It is a defence, or rather attack, by the PGA against LIV that this is their angle.

There are many aspects of pro's and cons regarding LIV but to my mind, on the subject discussed most this morning, of paying ALL players, I think they have this right. If they push the PGA into all players in a tournament getting something for participating in an event then I think that is a good move for all.
 
I expect that golf coaches etc are paid on a retainer or hours worked basis by the player. They aren't paid by the PGA Tour. Some events have on site physios etc but they aren't part pf the travelling circus.
I'd agree about that. But see my addition/update to the post you quoted...Tennis bodies ATP/WTA provide physios, at least at majors.
 
Perhaps it’s the transparency of what LIV is paying all who play that irks many, whereas the 2 existing tours tend to be very cagey about the appearance money that’s paid out
 
Seems to me that LIV supporters are happy for it to break PGA and leave professional golf with just the same 48 players for 14 annual events.

Nobody wants to see that, there are plenty that want to see the LIV series fade away though.
The PGA Tour know they are threatened by LIV, and they clearly don’t have faith in their own product to take on LIV in a commercial battleground. They have introduced sanctions and alliances now with the DPWT to try and force players to stay with them, in the face of life changing wealth on the LIV series. They could have allowed players to have exemptions, but they have chosen a more aggressive route, which has forced a chasm of support between LIV and the PGA Tour, but make no mistake, the vast majority who are enjoying watching what LIV is offering, will also enjoy watching golf on the other tours and don’t want to see any of them fail.
Unfortunately- the actions being taken by Monahan and Pelley are weakening those tours, The Scottish Open is a perfect and prime example of that - some big names banned from competing- for what? Resentment and spite…..
 
I don't think LIV or its supporters have any intention of looking to break the PGA, ideally they would co-exist. It is a defence, or rather attack, by the PGA against LIV that this is their angle.

There are many aspects of pro's and cons regarding LIV but to my mind, on the subject discussed most this morning, of paying ALL players, I think they have this right. If they push the PGA into all players in a tournament getting something for participating in an event then I think that is a good move for all.
However, as far as I understand - and I haven't located the rules tht would confirm it - to be able to award OWGR points, a tournament must have a (halfway?) cut and be 72 holes. Those are 2 attributes LIV specifically changed to be 'different'! There may be others, such as it being an 'invitation' tour (and) with no qualifying process. I don't see that changing, so there could well be an impasse. For many - the old timers on the way down (even DJ) probably won't care.
 
Top