• Thanks to each and every one of you for being part of the Golf Monthly community! We hope you have a joyous holiday season!

LIV Golf

BubbaP

Occasional Player of Golf
Joined
Oct 26, 2011
Messages
5,730
Location
Oxfordshire
Visit site
Not saying this is going to happen, or if it should happen (so no-one needs to be triggered) - but hyperthetically if the likes of the Masters did decide to alter things in the future.

2023 standings. Perhaps top 6
Screenshot_20240408-200106_Chrome.jpg
Or maybe 2024 standings to date. Perhaps top 8.
Screenshot_20240408-200124_Chrome.jpg
 

Ethan

Money List Winner
Joined
Jun 30, 2009
Messages
11,793
Location
Bearwood Lakes, Berks
Visit site
There’s a good interview with Rahm on the Chipping Forecast Masters preview. He suggests that LIV might be considering moving to 72 holes which will change the landscape on OWGR points.
It won't.

The main problems with LIV are no proper relegation/qualification, no cuts, and the team format undermines individual ranking. The 54 hole thing is not a deal breaker, the other things are, and LIV can't change them because their team branding and franchise business model depends on those other elements. They know that when they started but thought they could bluster their way through them.
 

Backsticks

Assistant Pro
Banned
Joined
Aug 7, 2012
Messages
3,852
Visit site
Is that really true? In terms of OWGR points it may have been but we know that they are no longer representative. Was it distinctly stronger?
Yes.
McIlroy, Fleetwood, Harmon, Henley, Matsuyama, Fitzpatrick, Spieth, Aberg, Scott, Day, Burns, Homa, Hojgaard, Morikawa, Kim, Young, An, Fowler, English, Pavon.

Even for a 'weaker' PGAT week - much maligned by LIVitians - the above alone outweigh the full muster of the truly relevant and competitive LIV players. Not to be confused with recognisable or even great names of the past - but McDowell, Bubba, Phil, Kaymer etc. are simply no benchmark for anyone claiming to be a relevant golfer of top rank today. Not to mention novelty act filler like Anthony Kim.

The names at the top can at first sight seem lost or diluted - and that a LIV field is instead a concentration of top golfers. But that is an illusion. Those 20, plus a hundred potential Bhatias, make the field stronger, not weaker. And not leaving wins exclusively to the handful of top rankers.
 

Dando

Q-School Graduate
Banned
Joined
Nov 3, 2014
Messages
10,613
Location
Se London
Visit site
It won't.

The main problems with LIV are no proper relegation/qualification, no cuts, and the team format undermines individual ranking. The 54 hole thing is not a deal breaker, the other things are, and LIV can't change them because their team branding and franchise business model depends on those other elements. They know that when they started but thought they could bluster their way through them.

The liv bots won’t like this post
 

Slab

Occasional Tour Caddy
Joined
Nov 20, 2011
Messages
11,872
Location
Port Louis
Visit site
Watching a US sports channel CBS discussing chance of success for several players at Masters. Funny bit was the chat around Rahm because they couldn't comment how he's playing recently without saying they watch LIV so they just said 'looking at his round scores' :p Instead they talked up Bhatia's chances :ROFLMAO:

(I wonder if the US pundits etc have a 2nd 'burner' smartphone they use just to watch liv golf on so their bosses don't find out)
 

Mel Smooth

Hacker
Joined
May 4, 2017
Messages
4,761
Visit site
Watching a US sports channel CBS discussing chance of success for several players at Masters. Funny bit was the chat around Rahm because they couldn't comment how he's playing recently without saying they watch LIV so they just said 'looking at his round scores' :p Instead they talked up Bhatia's chances :ROFLMAO:

(I wonder if the US pundits etc have a 2nd 'burner' smartphone they use just to watch liv golf on so their bosses don't find out)

I've seen a few clips over on X - it's actually quite entertaining seeing them trying to underpin the credibility of the PGAT while still trying to talk down LIV - even though they're discussing an event that is supposed to be relatively neutral and relatively independent from the tours.

Bobbleheads, the lot of em.. 🤣
 

wjemather

Well-known member
Joined
Dec 3, 2020
Messages
3,929
Location
Bristol
Visit site
Surprised to tune into LIVE FROM THE MASTERS and still hear them pedaling the line that the Liv Golfers wont be competitively sharp.
To be fair, there are fewer and fewer talking heads persisting with this drivel. Most have learned from last year.

I even heard someone saying that LIV is more competitive and players face more pressure than the PGA Tour because they have to be on it for all 54-holes due to the team element, whereas on the PGA Tour, it can often be like playing meaningless practice rounds when out of contention. I don't know if they'll be allowed on again!
 

Mel Smooth

Hacker
Joined
May 4, 2017
Messages
4,761
Visit site
You’d have to hope than any fair minded golf fan can see through the lazy headlines and comments.

Rahm saying he wouldn’t mind playing 72 holes on LIV, and it being repeatedly reported that he wanted it to go to 72 holes, and that he’s full of regret is just disrespectful to the guy.

We could do a thread on golf media tbh, some shocking imbalance from a lot of agencies at the moment.
 
Last edited:

larmen

Head Pro
Joined
Nov 2, 2015
Messages
2,778
Visit site
It won't.

The main problems with LIV are no proper relegation/qualification, no cuts, and the team format undermines individual ranking. The 54 hole thing is not a deal breaker, the other things are, and LIV can't change them because their team branding and franchise business model depends on those other elements. They know that when they started but thought they could bluster their way through them.
Has anyone actually started to care about any team? If they drop it, would someone notice it (negatively) ?
Some minor players would get lower pay days, which are still quite huge anyway. But for fans of the sport?
 
Top