D
Deleted member 18121
Guest
Please do, seriously... It's a painful readCan I close this thread yet?
Please do, seriously... It's a painful readCan I close this thread yet?
You do know itās not mandatory to click on the thread donāt you?Please do, seriously... It's a painful read
But there's a morbid curiosity that keeps you coming back to see who's posted the most outrageous claims and denials......You do know itās not mandatory to click on the thread donāt you?
No, you'd simply take the word of anyone who is saying what you want to hear. Same as a few others here (on both sides).Why not
would take his word over the half a dozen journalists and āsourcesā that are saying lots right now
I agree, I'd watch that.
If I was going to criticise LIV, apart from the usual criticisms, it's that they didn't go far enough when they wanted to be different from the PGA Tour events. 54 hole stroke play wasn't enough of a difference. In my opinion they should've really gone for it and had different formats for different events. Have a mixed foursomes tournament and a 4 man Texas Scramble. Personally I would love to see four of the best golfers in the world tee it up in a scramble to see what sort of ridiculous score they could shoot between them, or watch Koepka and Nelly Korda in an alternate shot format.
No, you'd simply take the word of anyone who is saying what you want to hear. Same as a few others here (on both sides).
Well, because of LIV, and the eyes it's opened, you might well get to see that now.
You've consistently ploughed one side of the fence regardless of what the source is. You've little chance of convincing anyone that you're analysing anything objectively now.Or Iām making my own choice and basing it on the people who are providing the information
Iāll certainly take more credibility for someone who was involved in the merger than someone quoting unnamed āsourceā
None of the spin can be trusted. Monahan neither. They will say what they have to say professionally in a given scenario. They arent speaking as real people, but as part of corporate contest. People might marvel at Monahans u turn or the pie in the sky spoof and rumours from LIV about players joining last year. His certainly one of the biggest u turns of all time. But strategically there is no issue. It is commercially expedient and the correct thing to do. It only rings odd to those of us on the outside. You must view the statements as coming from an office, not a person.You've consistently ploughed one side of the fence regardless of what the source is. You've little chance of convincing anyone that you're analysing anything objectively now.
You would be rightly cautious when it comes to quotes from Greg Norman or Phil Mickelson; you should apply the same standards to anyone speaking as a member/employee of the PGA Tour (particularly the policy board).
Agree from a pure entertainment point of you, but I very much doubt they would have had any serious golfers take the bait.I agree, I'd watch that.
If I was going to criticise LIV, apart from the usual criticisms, it's that they didn't go far enough when they wanted to be different from the PGA Tour events. 54 hole stroke play wasn't enough of a difference. In my opinion they should've really gone for it and had different formats for different events. Have a mixed foursomes tournament and a 4 man Texas Scramble. Personally I would love to see four of the best golfers in the world tee it up in a scramble to see what sort of ridiculous score they could shoot between them, or watch Koepka and Nelly Korda in an alternate shot format.
This thread is amusing to be fair.Yeah, a PGA Tour policy board member is probably not biased in any way, and certainly won't be inclined to present the deal as entirely favourable to the organisation he works for. Give over.
I'd be more inclined to listen to the guy who holds the purse strings, as ultimately he'll be the one making any decisions on the future of LIV.
What's a real golf fan, I mean what does that mean, nobody knows that that means but it's provocativeLeaving the saudi money aside the main problem with LIV that it wasn't that great to watch for real golf fans.
But there's a morbid curiosity that keeps you coming back to see who's posted the most outrageous claims and denials......
And āgolf with shortsāAgreed.
In reality all they became was āGolf but less than beforeā
Its a follower who watches golf for the pure sport. For whom genuine competition is enough.What's a real golf fan, I mean what does that mean, nobody knows that that means but it's provocative
When LIV became a thing, to some it wasn't all about the money. Ot was about growing the game, about team golf, about more time off for the golfers.Its a follower who watches golf for the pure sport. For whom genuine competition is enough.
Who does not need LOUD, razmataz, artificial teams that mean nothing and have even stupider names, uncritical on the payroll fanboy commentators, or its a knockout type fake sport, and wins that mean nothing.
For whom the sport, as it has always been played, for good reason, is real golf. They are the real golf fans.
It's all about the MONEY..
MONEY has the power, not Jay, not Greg, not PGA, Not Liv.
The PIF has the power...
It's what they decide OK in the merger that is key to all this..