Given the nature and history of the tournament, I'd expect The Masters Committee to have insisted that broadcasters be unbiased.
And they thought the PGAT had them tied down to strict contracts!!!!!
Have Augusta said anything about LIV logos on the shirts? Seem to remember our favourite American chubster caused some controversy by wearing LIV gear at the Open?Everything about the Masters broadcast is controlled by Augusta. CBS is doing what it is told.
(which network is it that lost the rights because a commentator mentioned the value of the prize money, against Augusta's instructions?)
So you think they ban Nike Adidas Titleist logo's as well ?Have Augusta said anything about LIV logos on the shirts? Seem to remember our favourite American chubster caused some controversy by wearing LIV gear at the Open?
Not the same thing but thanks for being pedanticSo you think they ban Nike Adidas Titleist logo's as well ?
So you think they ban Nike Adidas Titleist logo's as well ?
Why would they ban clothing or equipment manufacturers logos! They haven't in the past, so a pretty daft query imo! I don't even think they would they would ban LIV related logos of the form worn by players in DPWT events and at The Open.So you think they ban Nike Adidas Titleist logo's as well ?
Sir Nick, first August in 96 and now this - Leave Greg alone !
Though the nub is undeniable - LIV has done nothing to grow the game, and that did seem to be its big claim when it launched.
Come on — are you really that gullible, seriously? Do you believe everything that all the big corporates tell you as their rationale for policy? I think the technical term is ‘PR Guff’..
The thing is, they most definitely HAVE grown the game in some areas - already!! Australia is sold out, fans there are absolutely buzzing to see some top level pro golfers playing on their continent.
Backsticks criticism of LIV at this stage is like telling some parents their kid is going to be a complete failure when it's 6 months old![]()