Does the CW network normally just show repeats of stuff? If so, this seems to fit in well with what they stand for. Watch LIV on youTube, and watch the repeat on CW
First 2023 event is tomorrow
I don't know many people who watch the entire coverage when trying to catch up? If they do, I can't imagine they'd be saying "happy days, when catching up on LIV I only need to sit through a quick 5 hour sitting"
I don't know many people who watch the entire coverage when trying to catch up? If they do, I can't imagine they'd be saying "happy days, when catching up on LIV I only need to sit through a quick 5 hour sitting"
I suspect a lot of people see one reason for LIV being a lesser product is the fact that there is less coverage. They are losing a full day for starters, and then restricting the other days to a 5 hour window. Not saying the golf within that window would be rubbish, just that there is that extra limit in viewing time to fans.
Agree, it is another event you can dip in and out of, but not sure how many golf fans have the attention span to focus on multiple golf tours each weekend? It isn't football, it is a long sport. If we started adding in even more tours, to attract a few great players here and there to some of them, we could have 5 or 6 tours and a lot more golf to dip in and out of. But, I'd struggle to see that as a good thing. Personally, I'd like to see all the best players on one tour, increasing the probability you'd have great players at most events throughout the year, and some events with all / most of them. Tour rankings (e.g. FedEx ranking) is a decent way to track their progress against each other through the season, and give yourself some sort of end of season finale.
Given that the LIV players are committed to 14 LIV events (will that grow in the future), I very much doubt they would have played as often on the other tours they had been part of. Outside the Majors, sure there may be a handful of other events they'd like to turn up for. But, assuming they play the same number of weekends a year (i.e. assuming that none of the LIV players genuinely want less golf, more time to do other things), then that is 14 fewer PGA events each they'll be part of on the PGAT, or whatever other tour they were part of before LIV.
Which would have meant nearly all of them forfeiting their membership for not playing the minimum number (20) of tournaments in an case, regardless of their application for release being refused
It's only their second year remember. Takes years before they can get to the point of having t-shirts printed
Point me to the post where anybody said that all the LIV players were a bunch of hacks and will never win a major tournament. Clearly there are five players of the forty-eight capable of winning a major tournament.Have you not read all of this thread? They're all past it, bunch of old hacks who will never win a major again
Point me to the post where anybody said that all the LIV players were a bunch of hacks and will never win a major tournament. Clearly there are five players of the forty-eight capable of winning a major tournament.
I'll take a punt you meant to post "win in the future"Point me to the post where anybody said that all the LIV players were a bunch of hacks and will never win a major tournament. Clearly there are five players of the forty-eight capable of winning a major tournament.
No idea Phil.
I think he meant realistically capable of winning a major in future, not how many have won in past. Otherwise I suspect the Seniors Tour has a stellar field?
MAYbies....Smith, DJ, Bryson. As for the other, I have a better chance of winning a major.
