evemccc
Well-known member
If it ends up being the same as other tours then what is the point of players moving beyond getting more money
“What was it that first attracted you to Millionaire Paul Daniels?”
If it ends up being the same as other tours then what is the point of players moving beyond getting more money
Know it was a bit ago (so much going on), and likely contains an amount of "bluster", believe this is outlined as the attempt to tick the qualifying box in future.......
Using another tours “rankings” would satisfy any qualifying requirements unless there is a relationship between the two tours
LIV need to create an open Qualfying criteria within their tour that anyone can enter and gain a tour card from that Qualfying
Acknowledge none of us likely really know, but I viewed the "signing payments" as a way of de-risking the players from likely fall outs - bans, sponsors dropping, etc., taking the gamble, and gaining enough commitment to move the thing off the ground in the first place.I'm not sure how qualifying for LIV would actually work with the model they've created. If someone qualifies would they then have to negotiate their contract? For example Mickelson getting paid £XX million, if Rory qualified could he then say I want £XX million x 2? What if LIV said "No, you're only going to get half of what Mickelson gets and Rory turns it down? Is it a true qualifying competition if there are conditions such as appearance fees to be negotiated? The guaranteed income aspect seems incompatible with having open qualifying for the tour, unless they change their business model to put more emphasis on prize money for finishing position rather than for turning up.
There was a pro who share don twitter how he 'applied' for liv, and they came back telling him to have some success on another tour and if he proves himself they might contact him.I'm not sure how qualifying for LIV would actually work with the model they've created. If someone qualifies would they then have to negotiate their contract? For example Mickelson getting paid £XX million, if Rory qualified could he then say I want £XX million x 2? What if LIV said "No, you're only going to get half of what Mickelson gets and Rory turns it down? Is it a true qualifying competition if there are conditions such as appearance fees to be negotiated? The guaranteed income aspect seems incompatible with having open qualifying for the tour, unless they change their business model to put more emphasis on prize money for finishing position rather than for turning up.
Agree on likely form and being eligible for champions tour. In the USA though he is/was very popular ..I think Saudi seriously harmed any reputation for being credible top flight golf by their purchase of Mickelson. Paying the big oil bucks, and locking in a player in the field who in nobody's reckoning could be considered a top golfer anymore, and one fading fast, just showed that is was golf as exhibition, or legends revisited, rather than real golf. It is probably their biggest misjudgement and betrayed the celebs rather than top golfers approach.
Nah, have been doing it from the start. Thought it was an odd decision TBH.Showing the OWGR ranking of the players on the graphics today. Is that new, can’t say I’ve seen it before?
Nah, have been doing it from the start. Thought it was an odd decision TBH.
Although maybe it gives the option to remove them with a flounce later ?
Yep agree. It's interesting the different approaches, you'll likely be aware of the players popping up on the DPWT and some extent Asian tour in a quest for points. Then others just not at all so far.If LIV don't start getting OWGR points and the players start falling down the rankings I can't see them keeping the rankings visible for very long. Would be quite embarrassing if their top ranked players were 670th and 850th in the rankings. Having said that, they might keep it just to highlight how flawed the OWGR rankings are if Smith, BDC and Johnson are outside the top 500.
Can see Harrington dominating on there for a whileKeep up the progress, and he could get to Champions tour standard maybe, but the way Harrington is playing, Phil would still find it tough going there.
Phil has won 3 tournaments in the last 10 years. One round of -2 means absolutely nothing in terms of his ranking as a golfer.
A fantastic golfer. One of the most talented ever. He shot himself in the foot several times in majors, and hit peak Tiger, and overall for me ranks more like a 9 or 10 major winner. He is an all time great. His win at the USPGA was amazing and so well deserved. As was getting to 6 majors.
But for all that, he is well spent as a top competitive force now. He wouldnt be in the best 200 golfers on the world now.
If his Saudi role is as a figurehead, then fine, but that enforces LiV as showbiz celebrity golf, not real golf. Thats why his involvement has harmed LIVs credibility not helped their case as a real tour.