LIV Golf

Foxholer

Blackballed
Joined
Nov 16, 2011
Messages
24,160
Visit site
...

Of course they are a loss to THE PGA Tour, they might not challenge anymore, but between all the players that have left, they are well known to millions and millions of golf fans across the world. They have taken that interest and spread it to the new tour. It's going to be devastating long term to the PGA Tour.
No more than if they simply retired!
 

Foxholer

Blackballed
Joined
Nov 16, 2011
Messages
24,160
Visit site
Theegala
KH Lee
Thorbjornsen
Poston
Hardy
Hodges
Nesmith.

They are not household names.

You think the PGA tour are happy with that leaderboard? We'll see a winning score of 20 something under par by the end of todays round, the courses are being set up easy, just to give them something to write about in tomorrows papers.
Notwithstanding your selective deletion of some of the names - including the current 1 & 2 and the lurking Kisner, Travelers doesn't seem to be one where 'top' players dominate. The 2021 results (https://www.golfchannel.com/tours/pga-tour/2021/travelers-championship) certainly indicates that. And the 2020 event, won at 20 under (by DJ, with BdC T6) had plenty (a host even) of relatively unknowns at the top.
 
Last edited:
D

Deleted member 15344

Guest
I admire your hopeful, speculative position Phil. I mentioned the young Spanish lad LIV have apparently signed, they will find a way to get OWGR points, at the end of the day, if you have world class golfers playing competetive golf, then why shouldn't they earn ranking points?
Your last comment shows how far off of reality you are when it comes to the LIV series, sorry mate, it's just not going to pan out as you hope it will.

who is this young Spanish lad ?

Is my speculation surely no different than yours ?

And how can they “find” a way to get OWGR points ? It’s either approved or not by the governing bodies and it’s going to be a very hard sell

and why are you so confident it wont be a flash in the pan ? There is every chance that it just dies of death when they see that you can’t just buy a tour and there are only so many mercenaries that can be bought
 

BubbaP

Occasional Player of Golf
Joined
Oct 26, 2011
Messages
5,711
Location
Oxfordshire
Visit site
As has been said, unless liv suddenly create a number of invitationals the numbers are limited so the PGA Tour isn't really under threat. Diluted a bit, reduced in value a little - maybe, but the organisation is vast. PGA Tour University anyone!
The likes of Theegala & Thorbjornsen are a reminder how deep and wide the talent pool is these days.
 

Backsticks

Assistant Pro
Banned
Joined
Aug 7, 2012
Messages
3,852
Visit site
No more than if they simply retired!
No, more so. Being still active leaves two parallel tracks, with neither being able to claim to have the worlds best golfers, and no one truly knowing which is the best. Thats a recipe for disaster for everyone.
 

BubbaP

Occasional Player of Golf
Joined
Oct 26, 2011
Messages
5,711
Location
Oxfordshire
Visit site
No, more so. Being still active leaves two parallel tracks, with neither being able to claim to have the worlds best golfers, and no one truly knowing which is the best. Thats a recipe for disaster for everyone.
If the majors manage to stay independent, doesn't that strengthen their position as the showcase for the best?
 

Foxholer

Blackballed
Joined
Nov 16, 2011
Messages
24,160
Visit site
No, more so. Being still active leaves two parallel tracks, with neither being able to claim to have the worlds best golfers, and no one truly knowing which is the best. Thats a recipe for disaster for everyone.
Not sure why you quoted my post - it's still perfectly valid!
But your 'two parallel tracks' (are they?) is valid-ish. I don't see there being a problem with the 2 separate tours. I certainly believe I know which one, currently, has the greater quality, which is a term that has to be defined, and it ain't LIV!
 

Foxholer

Blackballed
Joined
Nov 16, 2011
Messages
24,160
Visit site
If the majors manage to stay independent, doesn't that strengthen their position as the showcase for the best?
The issue is 'how does a player qualify for Majors'. With no ability, currently, to allocate OWGR points and with existing Tours being on the body that allows Tours to allocate points, LIV is somewhat hamstrung in that regard.
 

woofers

Medal Winner
Joined
Feb 27, 2018
Messages
994
Visit site
Sunday Times reporting that in the US, Matthew Wolff expected to sign and in Europe speculation around Tommy Fleetwood, (Clare Craig, wife and manager, was at Centurion) and Henrik Stenson‘s management team in talks with LIV.
 

Ethan

Money List Winner
Joined
Jun 30, 2009
Messages
11,793
Location
Bearwood Lakes, Berks
Visit site
Sunday Times reporting that in the US, Matthew Wolff expected to sign and in Europe speculation around Tommy Fleetwood, (Clare Craig, wife and manager, was at Centurion) and Henrik Stenson‘s management team in talks with LIV.

All the players who signed up are either clearly on the slide (Westwood, Poulter, GMac), in a bit of a funk (DJ, Koepka, BdC), or players yet to establish themselves. Stenson is clearly on the slide, Wolff in the funk and Fleetwood possibly one or other, or both. I would wonder about the players in a funk. Most of them are young enough for a good recovery and I think if they get their games back, will start to think more about legacy again, and if entry to majors is impeded by ranking points or other obstacles, may rethink LIV.

On the broader issues, I don't get the continual need to justify the LIV Tour by criticising the financing or raising spurious claims abnout the tax status of the PGA Tour, or whether they give enough of the revenue to the players.

If anyone likes the LIV Tour and see it as a good thing, great, good for them, feel free to watch it on youtube, and enjoy it.

But don't pretend it is trying to grow the game, attract new audiences or do anything virtuous, because anyone just makes themselves look deluded by doing so. If anyone are not bothered about Saudi sport washing, that is up to them. If players want to grab more money, fine. They are going in with their eyes open, and since the PGA Tour has said they will be banned, they shouldn't be surprised or affronted when they are banned. They have not been promised entry into majors or OWGR points, so equally they can't protest if or when those organisations decide against them.

I am sure more players will go over, but I expect a few to recant. If I was the PGA Tour, I would offer a one-time return window later this season, then close the doors firmly.
 
Last edited:

4LEX

Well-known member
Joined
Feb 8, 2019
Messages
2,057
Visit site
As has been said, unless liv suddenly create a number of invitationals the numbers are limited so the PGA Tour isn't really under threat. Diluted a bit, reduced in value a little - maybe, but the organisation is vast. PGA Tour University anyone!
The likes of Theegala & Thorbjornsen are a reminder how deep and wide the talent pool is these days.

Exactly. I see some people taking shots at the number of 'unknowns' on the leaderboard at the moment. That is how the PGA operates, it creates and builds players. New talent emerging is part of the process. The total opposite to LIV which is an elite, invite only tour.
 

Backsticks

Assistant Pro
Banned
Joined
Aug 7, 2012
Messages
3,852
Visit site
Exactly. I see some people taking shots at the number of 'unknowns' on the leaderboard at the moment. That is how the PGA operates, it creates and builds players. New talent emerging is part of the process. The total opposite to LIV which is an elite, invite only tour.
Agree with most, but would quibble with elite. Its what they might like to have it as. But unless they get at least 40 of the current world top 50, and all of the top 10, then it wont work. At the moment it is part Champions tour, part early retirement, part injury afflicted, part long shots for the future, and real unknowns who cant make the proper tour, rather than elite. A curious melange
 
Last edited:

Mel Smooth

Hacker
Joined
May 4, 2017
Messages
4,664
Visit site
Sunday Times reporting that in the US, Matthew Wolff expected to sign and in Europe speculation around Tommy Fleetwood, (Clare Craig, wife and manager, was at Centurion) and Henrik Stenson‘s management team in talks with LIV.

I mentioned Stenson last week - was rebuffed due to his Ryder Cup involvement. Personally, I think the old "European Tour" and associates are keeping their cards close to their chest - if Portland is regarded as a significant step forward from Centurion, then I wouldn't be surprised to see a move towards an agreement with the DP world tour and LIV. The Ryder Cup needs players from all the current tours, on both teams, and this could be a signifcant factor in finding some common ground for all the players to stay actively involved in the Ryder Cup selection.
 

Backsticks

Assistant Pro
Banned
Joined
Aug 7, 2012
Messages
3,852
Visit site
Ryder Cup will be collateral damage here. Its three days. Its limited to two regions. Its been a good run since 1979, but maybe its day is done.
It certainly is only a cork in the storm that is Saudi v USA.
 
D

Deleted member 15344

Guest
Stenson won’t go - he is the current Ryder Cup captain and the Ryder Cup is still huge within the sport

There are no Europeans that have gone to the LIV that you would see in the next team and the US have a huge conveyor belt of talent that will replace the three they have that would prob be in the next team

The Ryder Cup will have no players from the LIV tour
 

Backsticks

Assistant Pro
Banned
Joined
Aug 7, 2012
Messages
3,852
Visit site
As long as serious players that would otherwise probably be on the team are ineligible for it, the Ryder Cup is dead. Its credibility will be gone.
Its probably already dead, but it just doesnt know it yet.
 

Mel Smooth

Hacker
Joined
May 4, 2017
Messages
4,664
Visit site
[
Notwithstanding your selective deletion of some of the names - including the current 1 & 2 and the lurking Kisner, Travelers doesn't seem to be one where 'top' players dominate. The 2021 results (https://www.golfchannel.com/tours/pga-tour/2021/travelers-championship) certainly indicates that. And the 2020 event, won at 20 under (by DJ, with BdC T6) had plenty (a host even) of relatively unknowns at the top.

Are you aware that Liverpool Phil had already quoted the recognisable names at the top of the leaderboard (and I did quote his post when I replied to make that fairly obvious), and I was countering that with relative unknowns who were up there.

I have had a message from admins making more or less the same point - so I guess somebody may have reported my post - which is a bit of an odd thing to be reporting if that's the case?

The Travelers may not be an event where the top players dominate, but a quick look at the final standings from last year show that Ancer finished 4th, 2 shots off the lead at 1 under and Koepka was T5 at 10 under. Surely that backs up the point that I'm making about the PGA tour being weakened by the banning of LIV players?
 
Top