Oddsocks
Ryder Cup Winner
View attachment 42757
Thats a trolley and stand bag quite easily in the back of an M2.
Electric or push/pull?
View attachment 42757
Thats a trolley and stand bag quite easily in the back of an M2.
Agreed, but what I fear from these tiny engines is that theyu will be dead by 100Km. They are pulling heavy cars around,This is exactly it.
What used to be seen as a really ooomph mobile was Harry Enfield's Escort 1.6 xr3i turbo nutter bastard.
That had 104 bhp and 0-60 in about 9.2 secs.
Nowadays a 1.0 Skoda Fabia or Seat Arona can pretty much match those figures for bhp and 0-60.
But show a 1-litre engine to many people and they immediately think "puny golf cart" which is absolute tosh.
What these cars offer is decent performance, good mpg and low insurance. With living costs rising at record rates, this has to be a major consideration.
I'm seriously considering the Seat Arona.
I will miss the torque moving from the diesel, but yeah 0-60 would be 8secs max, anything slower is slow. Doesn't have to be an absolute rocket ship, but as someone above said, rural Aberdeenshire, you do need to take your space quickly when overtaking sometimes.What does "economical" mean for you? And do you do enough miles to really notice the difference between 40mpg and 30mpg say?
And what does S-O-A-S mean to you? Similar to your octavia in 0-60 and 30-70?
They're subjective terms which mean different things to different people, if you see what I mean.
This is exactly it.
What used to be seen as a really ooomph mobile was Harry Enfield's Escort 1.6 xr3i turbo nutter bastard.
That had 104 bhp and 0-60 in about 9.2 secs.
Nowadays a 1.0 Skoda Fabia or Seat Arona can pretty much match those figures for bhp and 0-60.
But show a 1-litre engine to many people and they immediately think "puny golf cart" which is absolute tosh.
What these cars offer is decent performance, good mpg and low insurance. With living costs rising at record rates, this has to be a major consideration.
I'm seriously considering the Seat Arona.
I will miss the torque moving from the diesel, but yeah 0-60 would be 8secs max, anything slower is slow. Doesn't have to be an absolute rocket ship, but as someone above said, rural Aberdeenshire, you do need to take your space quickly when overtaking sometimes.
Economical means getting as close to 50+ mpg as possible. If I'm working in office it's a 35 mile round trip, second golf club is a 25 mile round trip, and we play league matches and opens across Aberdeenshire, so 30mpg would be a non-sstarter.
Yep. My old man has a Focus hatch with the 1.5t 150bhp. It's not sluggish and there are plenty of 182bhp about. Great car for the money. The hatchback's quite big. Might not even need an estate.What about a focus st estate?
To be honest, with those figures you will probably have a much larger choice with a diesel over a petrol.I will miss the torque moving from the diesel, but yeah 0-60 would be 8secs max, anything slower is slow. Doesn't have to be an absolute rocket ship, but as someone above said, rural Aberdeenshire, you do need to take your space quickly when overtaking sometimes.
Economical means getting as close to 50+ mpg as possible. If I'm working in office it's a 35 mile round trip, second golf club is a 25 mile round trip, and we play league matches and opens across Aberdeenshire, so 30mpg would be a non-sstarter.
In my youth I had a Ford Orion Ghia that had an Escort RS Turbo engine in it. Full bodykit with purple lights underneath. Loved that car when it started, the starter motor used to get jammed when it got too hot so I had to give it a few knocks with a hammer to get it loose.How much did an 80s Escort weigh compared to a modern car!
Was an XR3I really considered a ‘nutter’? Maybe the RS Turbo at a push.
Cars with tiny engines rarely offer the fuel saving buyer hope for. You’ll be lucky to save a few quid a year.
If you really want to save money, don’t buy a new car. The depreciation will eat up any other savings you make.
Yep. My old man has a Focus hatch with the 1.5t 150bhp. It's not sluggish and there are plenty of 182bhp about. Great car for the money. The hatchback's quite big. Might not even need an estate.
Are they still horrendous on fuel? My sister had one and it only did low 20s MPG I think. I remember at the time it was worse than I was getting out of my M3.What about a focus st estate?
Electric. An old Motocaddy S3. Full disclosure, I had to take the wheels off to make it fit.Electric or push/pull?
Are they still horrendous on fuel? My sister had one and it only did low 20s MPG I think. I remember at the time it was worse than I was getting out of my M3.
It was what I was going to swap into, I think the focus h/back is just too small a boot. But if going down that routre I'd be as well sticking with the Skoda in the same class size, without getting a bulky estate.What about a focus st estate?
A Volvo V40 is a good shout, I don't know the Hyundai so can't comment there. I've had v40's as courtesy cars and they are very tidy with plenty of poke. It's just about the boot then.Have you considered a Volvo or a Hyundai i30
It was what I was going to swap into, I think the focus h/back is just too small a boot. But if going down that routre I'd be as well sticking with the Skoda in the same class size, without getting a bulky estate.
I would have thought the Octavia was more mondeo size ?
Skoda Rapid has bigger boot than Mondeo. Octavia has boot even bigger than that.I would have thought the Octavia was more mondeo size ?
It’s on the golf platform, isn’t it?