• Thanks to each and every one of you for being part of the Golf Monthly community! We hope you have a joyous holiday season!

The Footie Thread

  • Thread starter Deleted member 15344
  • Start date

MiurasFan

Blackballed
Joined
Feb 6, 2023
Messages
181
Visit site
You said "he was almost certainly going to have a 1 on 1 with the keeper"

So, you seem to have posted that, almost exactly word for word. What am I missing?
The difference between 'going to have a' and 'been'!! Also probably explains your incredulousness in previous posts
 
Last edited:

Swango1980

Well-known member
Joined
Jul 22, 2019
Messages
13,106
Location
Lincolnshire
Visit site
So, to clarify:

You do not think he would have BEEN one on one with the keeper had he not been fouled.

However, you think he almost certainly would have had a one and one with the keeper had he not been fouled?

Must say, this makes no sense, as they are effectively two ways of saying exactly the same thing, yet you claim that you didn't say he would have been one on one, but claim he almost certainly would have had a one on one!?

Going back to your original comment, I will happily and confidently say that he certainly would not have been one on one with the keeper had he not been fouled.
 

Bdill93

Undisputed King of FOMO
Joined
Jun 18, 2020
Messages
5,732
Visit site
So, to clarify:

You do not think he would have BEEN one on one with the keeper had he not been fouled.

However, you think he almost certainly would have had a one and one with the keeper had he not been fouled?

Must say, this makes no sense, as they are effectively two ways of saying exactly the same thing, yet you claim that you didn't say he would have been one on one, but claim he almost certainly would have had a one on one!?

Going back to your original comment, I will happily and confidently say that he certainly would not have been one on one with the keeper had he not been fouled.

Even if he had he wouldn't have scored, cant hit a barn door that bloke. :ROFLMAO:
 

HomecountiesJohn

Well-known member
Joined
Jun 13, 2020
Messages
444
Location
Berkshire/Surrey Border
Visit site
So, to clarify:

You do not think he would have BEEN one on one with the keeper had he not been fouled.

However, you think he almost certainly would have had a one and one with the keeper had he not been fouled?

Must say, this makes no sense, as they are effectively two ways of saying exactly the same thing, yet you claim that you didn't say he would have been one on one, but claim he almost certainly would have had a one on one!?

Going back to your original comment, I will happily and confidently say that he certainly would not have been one on one with the keeper had he not been fouled.

Jeez, are you LiverpoolPhil under another handle?
 

Swango1980

Well-known member
Joined
Jul 22, 2019
Messages
13,106
Location
Lincolnshire
Visit site
Jeez, are you LiverpoolPhil under another handle?
Why, because I can't understand the point someone is making.

Presumably, if it was felt Grealish was going to be 1v1 with goalkeeper, then the defender would have had a possible red card (given he didn't try and make a challenge)? Of course, not one person ever brought that up, and Grealish was never going to be 1 on 1 with goalkeeper in a million years in that incident.

It would be funny if I WAS Liverpoolphil though, as some of our debates would suggest he has multiple personality disorder :)
 

HomecountiesJohn

Well-known member
Joined
Jun 13, 2020
Messages
444
Location
Berkshire/Surrey Border
Visit site
Why, because I can't understand the point someone is making.

Presumably, if it was felt Grealish was going to be 1v1 with goalkeeper, then the defender would have had a possible red card (given he didn't try and make a challenge)? Of course, not one person ever brought that up, and Grealish was never going to be 1 on 1 with goalkeeper in a million years in that incident.

It would be funny if I WAS Liverpoolphil though, as some of our debates would suggest he has multiple personality disorder :)

You understand the point Muirasfan is making, your just arguing the semantics, it's petty and tiresome.

Your constant argumentative, must have the last word, persona that is dsiplayed in this thread Is likened to that somewhat of LiverpoolPhil.
 

Swango1980

Well-known member
Joined
Jul 22, 2019
Messages
13,106
Location
Lincolnshire
Visit site
You understand the point Muirasfan is making, your just arguing the semantics, it's petty and tiresome.

Your constant argumentative, must have the last word, persona that is dsiplayed in this thread Is likened to that somewhat of LiverpoolPhil.
It is ironic that you are the one prolonging this conversation then, by being argumentative. Are you Liverpoolphil in disguise?
 

Big85

Active member
Joined
Aug 10, 2021
Messages
115
Visit site
Unbelievable Jeff!! It doesn’t matter what your opinion’s are it won’t change anything! It’s not worth the arguing or disagreement 🤣😂 go get your golf clubs out and have a round of golf. Happy Monday!!
 
D

Deleted member 15344

Guest
Jeez, are you LiverpoolPhil under another handle?
Why, because I can't understand the point someone is making.

Presumably, if it was felt Grealish was going to be 1v1 with goalkeeper, then the defender would have had a possible red card (given he didn't try and make a challenge)? Of course, not one person ever brought that up, and Grealish was never going to be 1 on 1 with goalkeeper in a million years in that incident.

It would be funny if I WAS Liverpoolphil though, as some of our debates would suggest he has multiple personality disorder :)
You understand the point Muirasfan is making, your just arguing the semantics, it's petty and tiresome.

Your constant argumentative, must have the last word, persona that is dsiplayed in this thread Is likened to that somewhat of LiverpoolPhil.
It is ironic that you are the one prolonging this conversation then, by being argumentative. Are you Liverpoolphil in disguise?

The obsession is touching

But keep me out of your little pedantic spats please
 

Tashyboy

Please don’t ask to see my tatts 👍
Joined
Dec 12, 2013
Messages
20,047
Visit site
Gets Penalties easy enough.

Which part of Neville’s summary “ that was a poor tackle by the defender” don’t you get. He and every one else goes into meltdown because Grealish theatrically went down. It was a foul, it was a soft foul and it was one of many fouls on Grealish yesterday. If the defender had made a good tackle we wouldn’t be discussing this now. But he didn’t. Talking of tackles how comes no one talks of the excellent Tackle by Dias earlier in the game
 

PJ87

Journeyman Pro
Joined
Apr 1, 2016
Messages
22,787
Location
Havering
Visit site
Which part of Neville’s summary “ that was a poor tackle by the defender” don’t you get. He and every one else goes into meltdown because Grealish theatrically went down. It was a foul, it was a soft foul and it was one of many fouls on Grealish yesterday. If the defender had made a good tackle we wouldn’t be discussing this now. But he didn’t. Talking of tackles how comes no one talks of the excellent Tackle by Dias earlier in the game

Staying on your feet gets you nothing

https://www.mirror.co.uk/sport/football/news/west-hams-matt-jarvis-hammered-3420556

Jarvis many years ago against arsenal, hacked in the box. Stays on his feet..no pen given

Match of day was very much on the side of it should have been a pen

I mean var these days you "should" get the pen but still the case why stay on your feet?
 

MiurasFan

Blackballed
Joined
Feb 6, 2023
Messages
181
Visit site
Presumably, if it was felt Grealish was going to be 1v1 with goalkeeper, then the defender would have had a possible red card (given he didn't try and make a challenge)? Of course, not one person ever brought that up, and Grealish was never going to be 1 on 1 with goalkeeper in a million years in that incident.
Had it been a deliberate foul, then certainly Yellow, possibly Red. However this was simply a 'careless' one, so no further disciplinary action is needed. As it wasn't already an obvious goal scoring opportunity - though, as my first post on the mini-topic I think it would have developed into one if not for the foul - Penalty only was appropriate. Whether that was what the Ref thought, I have no idea!. And remember that opinions are like anuses. . . . everybody has one!
 
Last edited:

MiurasFan

Blackballed
Joined
Feb 6, 2023
Messages
181
Visit site
Staying on your feet gets you nothing

https://www.mirror.co.uk/sport/football/news/west-hams-matt-jarvis-hammered-3420556

Jarvis many years ago against arsenal, hacked in the box. Stays on his feet..no pen given

Match of day was very much on the side of it should have been a pen

I mean var these days you "should" get the pen but still the case why stay on your feet?
For me, Football has gone too far the other way and simulation is now far too omnipresent - at least in Premier League. It was refreshing to see very little of it in the World Cup and a bit depressing to see 'back to normal' in EPL!
 
Top