Pin-seeker
Well-known member
City will definitely win the league.
How Petty
How do you know what the player said, a lot of assumptions made about that incident on this thread. Unless you were the ref you can't know what was heard.Not sure how Grealish threw his leg back. He was simply running like any other human being, the defender clipped his back leg, penalty. Even Gary Neville is jumping on the "Jack Grealish playing for foul" bandwagon now. Any other player, it is just a penalty, defender was clumsy.
I don't mind if refs are going to book players for surrounding him. Except that it is just completely random. You'll get players randomly sent off, like yesterday, based on a random decision. If they are going to do it, book every player that surrounds them.
I think the first line is stretching things but i agree with the rest. Sticky is a very good description. Didn't work thoughIt’s one of the best pitches I have ever seen.
but they need water to make the ball zip off.
Maybe they think they can stop Untied by keeping the pitch sticky.
No really I have been on the pitch it really is very good.I think the first line is stretching things but i agree with the rest. Sticky is a very good description. Didn't work though
You are correct, I do not know.How do you know what the player said, a lot of assumptions made about that incident on this thread. Unless you were the ref you can't know what was heard.
Like you though I wish FIFA would back referees in giving cards out whenever players do this. Only the captain should be allowed to approach the referee.
So you admit to not knowing what was said, but then you go on to make further accusations without evidence against the referee.You are correct, I do not know.
However, allegedly the ref in the Wolves game simply booked the 3rd player who approached him. The booking was immediate, and apparently it wasn't to do with what the player said. Today, it looked very similar. There didn't appear to be a huge amount of anger in the player (to the point of shouting and swearing), and ref simply looked quick to book him.
It is why it would he interesting to see refs report. Did they say something untoward, or were refs urged to feel more free to book any player approaching them?
Given the appauling performances by refs this weekend, I wouldn't feel confident that they'd be able to apply this with any consistency whatsoever. They'd probably happily book a player who politely explains he won the ball after decision goes against him, whilst not booking a player that runs 40 yards to tell ref to "f off".
I didn't make accusations. I made an evaluation on incidents that happened this weekend, and what appears to have happened from my perspective. This was explained by a player who happened to be on the pitch, and had the referee explain what the yellow card was for (Wolves game). In the game today, it seemed very similar.So you admit to not knowing what was said, but then you go on to make further accusations without evidence against the referee.
I find these discussions really frustrating to read as all I hear is all refs are crap. No one offering solutions and everyone forgetting these people are just human beings and therefore subject to making mistakes, especially when under pressure.
I offer up an idea to offer referees some help, and all I get is well they still can't be trusted to get it right. So have you any idea's how it might be improved.
Yes I have one.So you admit to not knowing what was said, but then you go on to make further accusations without evidence against the referee.
I find these discussions really frustrating to read as all I hear is all refs are crap. No one offering solutions and everyone forgetting these people are just human beings and therefore subject to making mistakes, especially when under pressure.
I offer up an idea to offer referees some help, and all I get is well they still can't be trusted to get it right. So have you any idea's how it might be improved.
I don't mind if refs are going to book players for surrounding him. Except that it is just completely random. You'll get players randomly sent off, like yesterday, based on a random decision. If they are going to do it, book every player that surrounds them.
It did seem to me, that he 'bought it' somewhat. Didn't seem to be in the expected rush to control the ball and take a shot then went down pretty tamely. I'm pretty certain he'd have scored if he hadn't been impaired.Not sure how Grealish threw his leg back. He was simply running like any other human being, the defender clipped his back leg, penalty. Even Gary Neville is jumping on the "Jack Grealish playing for foul" bandwagon now. Any other player, it is just a penalty, defender was clumsy.
I'd like to see more cards given for players who harangue refs! I think there's some sort of logic for who to card too - either the one that starts the haranguing or the most aggressive one. Simulation is another of the Bees in my bonnet too, but often harder to be certain of!I don't mind if refs are going to book players for surrounding him. Except that it is just completely random. You'll get players randomly sent off, like yesterday, based on a random decision. If they are going to do it, book every player that surrounds them.
Did you actually see the Grealish incident? He was running away from goal, left side of box. I'm not sure what you mean by being certain he would have scored if he hadn't been impaired.It did seem to me, that he 'bought it' somewhat. Didn't seem to be in the expected rush to control the ball and take a shot then went down pretty tamely. I'm pretty certain he'd have scored if he hadn't been impaired.
I'd like to see more cards given for players who harangue refs! I think there's some sort of logic for who to card too - either the one that starts the haranguing or the most aggressive one. Simulation is another of the Bees in my bonnet too, but often harder to be certain of!
Yes, I did see it! But he was almost certainly going to have a 1 on 1 with the keeper had he not been fouled (or 'drawn the foul'). These guys discuss it https://www.skysports.com/watch/vid...hat-roy-keane-he-fell-over-like-norman-wisdomDid you actually see the Grealish incident? He was running away from goal, left side of box. I'm not sure what you mean by being certain he would have scored if he hadn't been impaired.
The defender hit his leg, which threw it into his other leg, and down he went. No one is staying on their feet after that, unless they can defeat physics.
Yes, I did see it! But he was almost certainly going to have a 1 on 1 with the keeper had he not been fouled (or 'drawn the foul'). These guys discuss it https://www.skysports.com/watch/vid...hat-roy-keane-he-fell-over-like-norman-wisdom
He was definitely fouled, so not cheating! 'Bought the foul' might be appropriate thoughI'd like Keane and co to call it for what it is, cheating.
Calling it smart just encourages the rest to carry on cheating.
I am gobsmacked you think he would have been 1 on 1 with keeper if he hadn't gone down. Truly gobsmacked. Given ge was running towards the edge of the box, with a pretty crowded penalty area in the middle as well.Yes, I did see it! But he was almost certainly going to have a 1 on 1 with the keeper had he not been fouled (or 'drawn the foul'). These guys discuss it https://www.skysports.com/watch/vid...hat-roy-keane-he-fell-over-like-norman-wisdom
That's not what I posted!I am gobsmacked you think he would have been 1 on 1 with keeper if he hadn't gone down. Truly gobsmacked. Given ge was running towards the edge of the box, with a pretty crowded penalty area in the middle as well.
He was definitely fouled, so not cheating! 'Bought the foul' might be appropriate though