Grizzly
Well-known member
The worrying thing is five of the seven have got out playing attacking shots. Thats poor judgement however you look at it.
He’s gone !!Go Woody
What's the pin position?Here's the scenario:
450 yard par 4, water in front of the green, stroke index 1. You push your tee shot, it clips a branch and drops down where it nestles in a horrible lie in deep rough. You get to your ball and quickly identify 2 options:
A. There is a path to the green, but you'll have to carry it 230 over water, keeping it low under a branch and stop it quickly on the green.
B. Easy wedge to middle of the fairway, then wedge to the green and hope to get it close and save par.
What option would you take?
What option would Scottie Scheffler take?
What option would an England batsman take?
Not with cymbals as keeper and Root in the slips.Give the ball to Wood. Australia all out 37.
This game feels in the balance now. If Australia can’t get away in this innings, we know England can chase down totals… but only if they can keep their players from falling apart.The frustrating thing for me is that all Australia have had to do is turn up and watch England beat themselves.
Must be so disheartening as a bowler to be running in and seeing cymbals Bairstow behind the stumps. He must have photos of the selectors in compromising positions to keep getting in to the team as a keeper.
I think England have a history of picking a batter who keeps wicket ahead of a specialist keeper. The irritating thing is that Foakes probably wouldn’t have scored a lot less than Bairstow has in this series to date.
Prior - the guy was a end but was at least a quality keeperIs Jack Russel the last time we consistently picked a specialist keeper rather and a batsman/keeper?
I always think of Prior as a decent enough keeper who was picked more for his batting ability.Prior - the guy was a end but was at least a quality keeper
Also a quality batsman. Test average of 41 is higher than most of the current England team.Prior - the guy was a end but was at least a quality keeper
Initially his keeping was not great though. Chris Reed and Foster at Essex, I seem to recall, were better with the gloves at the time.Also a quality batsman. Test average of 41 is higher than most of the current England team.
Exactly. The point was made that he was in the team because his batting was better than the other keepers, not because of his keeping.Initially his keeping was not great though. Chris Reed and Foster at Essex, I seem to recall, were better with the gloves at the time.
I think you would have to argue for Mark Wallace and Tim Ambrose as well.Initially his keeping was not great though. Chris Reed and Foster at Essex, I seem to recall, were better with the gloves at the time.