D
Deleted member 15344
Guest
I have doubts he was the right man but the issues run much deeper than him. This is just window dressing
https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/cricket/59754595
He was never the right man for the job
I have doubts he was the right man but the issues run much deeper than him. This is just window dressing
I disagree. I felt he done enough to have a go, the only other candidate would have been Gillespie but he didn't want it at the time
Old guard try to foist responsibility for their incompetence on to the person left clearing up the mess is bad faith. ‘Meeting called did not follow process’ … what planet are they on..
To be fair, I think there is a lot of support for what Smith has said here* - whilst changes were clearly necessary, the mass sacking, including a number of people who were never at the club at the same time as Rafiq and can have had nothing to do with the issues discussed, together with the blanket acceptance of everything said (but none of the counter points), has been seen as extreme, bordering on unlawful, by large sections of the clubs membership. If, as it appears, Lord Patel was not in that position legally to make those calls, then he really has not got the proverbial leg to stand on.
* note, I am not expressing my views here, just outlining what has been written by a lot of Yorkshire supporters
I cant say I know much of this, other than in various media outlets which may have different agenda. But prima facia it looks like process being thrown in the way of deliverng results. The Lord Kamlesh appointment being called into question because someone had not filed the paperwork on time. The link to the Yorkshire Post article feels more colourful than the BBC https://www.yorkshirepost.co.uk/spo...ire-ccc-is-invalid-claims-robin-smith-3552965
Wasnt YP seen as part of the group that tried to suppress the initial Rafiq complaints?
I saw that in the ‘i’ today.Justin Langer has just become available. Don't hang around lads.........
Is Gillespie in the betting?I saw that in the ‘i’ today.
odds Langer 7/4 and Stewart 11/4.
Good choice
Surely Langer is the call. Think with Stewart we are just repeating the same mistakes in terms of yes men afraid to make big changes
dont think either are the right option personally, but then id rather they change the structure completely rather than worry about the coach who never actually gets to coach. how much input do they expect a coach to have to a players technique thats been ingrained for years and years, the issues with most of the current side arent overnight fixes or tweeks needed!
starting with harrison and strauss, splitting red and white ball roles completely and having more manager than head coach roles, employing specialist coaches as and when needed, better input to the learning players are doing at their counties etc
if we keep the current structure, whoever gets the job, we are repeating the sames mistakes again in the long run (sadly that suits Harrison and his cronies current plans)
Surely Langer with his Aussie roots and not being English will be more willing to do what is necessary to make changes for success. He can point to the Aussie set up and use that as a template. Whether he can get through the archaic structure and jobs for the boys set up we have is a different issue and one that I think any coach for years to come will struggle with. I can't see the structure being changed soon
cracking effort from the U19 lads, India team just too good on the day sadly
plenty of talent we're going to see plenty more of in the coming years in both teams
Prest, Rew, Boyden, Ahmed all look not far from being ready for county cricket if not more soon
If it's going to be an Aussie it has to be Gillespie.Surely Langer is the call. Think with Stewart we are just repeating the same mistakes in terms of yes men afraid to make big changes