Yep it was the post round stuff really, the studio stuff is inoffensive but just feels dated, same format for years. They need to works their assets harder, anything with ND in, including the interactive stuff has been really good, he & that is the future IMOAgree that some of Sky's coverage this weekend was poor with interviews being shown at the expense of live action.
BTW I thought Mark Roe (terrible commentator) was not involved in the broadcasts.
Thought Donaldson and Wilson were very good for BBC 5live
Agree that some of Sky's coverage this weekend was poor with interviews being shown at the expense of live action.
BTW I thought Mark Roe (terrible commentator) was not involved in the broadcasts.
I have a genuine critique of sky according my opinion, some good, some bad etc etc, but because you and homer & others have an anti phil agenda (sometimes correctly) it gets discounted because the same old people are slagging off sky, I’ve never done that really.I made a genuine reply to you, if you want to turn it in to something else, count me out, sometimes you should read the post and not the poster.
View attachment 25616[/QUOTE][QUOTE="therod, post: 1895094, but don’t let the detail get in the way of the anti phil agenda
You really need to give your head a shake, it has nothing to do with anyone else, I never said Sky didn’t get things wrong, simply pointed out, TO YOU, that Sky probably think they get most right, especially as their production team were given a huge slap on the back for their golf coverage.I have a genuine critique of sky according my opinion, some good, some bad etc etc, but because you and homer & others have an anti phil agenda (sometimes correctly) it gets discounted because the same old people are slagging off sky, I’ve never done that really.
Me too, what does ‘give your head a shake mean’? Is it English?i'm loving this bitchathron
Let's be clear, not an anti-Phil agenda, but on his staunch anti-Sky stance I disagree and feel they have done a lot for golf coverage and some of their presentation stuff (Sky zone at the Open, British Masters etc, Open brekafast etc) has really enhanced the coverage. Granted, and as I've said before we can all argue about individual presenters (and that's not just relevant to golf). I understand where he's coming from and accept the point of view, just not one I agree with.I have a genuine critique of sky according my opinion, some good, some bad etc etc, but because you and homer & others have an anti phil agenda (sometimes correctly) it gets discounted because the same old people are slagging off sky, I’ve never done that really.
Can't believe the compliments for 5Live.
Had to resort to radio coverage for a while and they succeeded in making a thrilling encounter sound as exciting as a Church Bazaar.
Not helped by the most annoying know it all in broadcasting, Mark Chapman!
Yes he’s pretty good off 5Let's be clear, not an anti-Phil agenda, but on his staunch anti-Sky stance I disagree and feel they have done a lot for golf coverage and some of their presentation stuff (Sky zone at the Open, British Masters etc, Open brekafast etc) has really enhanced the coverage. Granted, and as I've said before we can all argue about individual presenters (and that's not just relevant to golf). I understand where he's coming from and accept the point of view, just not one I agree with.
On a slightly different and off piste topic, I'm hoping West Hill will give us both a chance to find some common ground and perhaps understand each other on here a bit better. Definitely looking forward to watching him play golf off his handicap
A driving range pro as I heard him described this week, beating the NO 1 golfer. That's heart, determination and guts. he had no right to beat him based on golf ability, but beat him he did. You have to ask how