Professional Golf 2024
- Thread starter Whydowedoit
- Start date
Imurg
The Grinder Of Pars (Semi Crocked)
There are a lot of +3, +4 ,+5 and even some +10 scores out there today....The leader is 15 under going round 7 under today
Golf is hard
Doon frae Troon
Ryder Cup Winner
Yeah, that was what I was meaning, unusual set of scoring usually down to rough weather
Arthur Wedge
Well-known member
Looks like a standard 3rd day score , some have pulled away , some have had mares . The wind was up a bit today as well
SatchFan
Q-School Graduate
Another great payday for Scheffler's caddie.
Mel Smooth
Hacker
Predictably solid win for Scheffler at the Fed Ex, and well deserved.
Did the PGAT buy the PA system off Temu though - poor old Jay looked totally bemused as he addressed the crowd.
Did the PGAT buy the PA system off Temu though - poor old Jay looked totally bemused as he addressed the crowd.
BubbaP
Occasional Player of Golf
Well played Morikawa for winning the lowest gross 
Fair play Scheffler for making it over the line this time.
Fair play Scheffler for making it over the line this time.
HomerJSimpson
Hall of Famer
Enjoyed watching the British Masters after watching the magnificent Curtis Cup win at Sunningdale. I couldn't believe how well these ladies played and big crowd with Lottie Woad and a shame she couldn't win.
Orikoru
Tour Winner
Is a weird system when you look at it like that - the best player got the highest playing handicap.Well played Morikawa for winning the lowest gross
Fair play Scheffler for making it over the line this time.
woofers
Medal Winner
Sadly a lot of men are sniffy about ladies golf.
I know a Pro who went to the AIG at Walton Heath last year, had never seen woman’s golf before and was “astounded” (his word) at the quality of golf played.
Pin-seeker
Well-known member
Barking_Mad
Well-known member
Surely given the Grenfell report Lowry will do the right thing and ditch his sponsors Kingspan who have been held partly responsible for supplying flammable insulation whilst "deliberately concealed” the safety risk.
Survivors had asked him to follow suit and follow Mercedes Formula 1 team in ditching the sponsorship but he's neither done so or replied to any of their requests.
Used to think he was a decent guy, but perhaps Judy file with the rest of the greedy b's.
Survivors had asked him to follow suit and follow Mercedes Formula 1 team in ditching the sponsorship but he's neither done so or replied to any of their requests.
Used to think he was a decent guy, but perhaps Judy file with the rest of the greedy b's.
HomerJSimpson
Hall of Famer
Hard to know his reasoning or whether he and his management have broached the subject formally but I do agree with you. If Mercedes can dump the sponsorship shouldn't be any reason why he can't
Swango1980
Well-known member
Could he have been waiting for the Grenfell report to have been released, to essentially get better clarification on the facts after being investigated? Didn't Ulster Rugby Club also extend their sponsorship with Grenfell? I wonder too if they also decided they'd review this once the report is released.
I suspect it might be better to await to see what decision they make in the next few days or so, once they have time to digest the contents of the report. After which it might be easier to make a moral judgement on their character?
Barking_Mad
Well-known member
It was known during the enquiry what they said and did. It didn't really need the report to confirm it.
Swango1980
Well-known member
Fair enough. I don't know exactly the details of what was known as fact and what was alleged publicly, before the release of the report. I suppose if it was all understood as fact publicly, then there may have been no requirement for a report at all, although I don't know if anything came out of the report that came as a surprise, or something was omitted from the report than some might have had blame attributed?
However, I was responding partly from your opening statement "Surely given the Grenfell report..." . As it has only been published today, I instinctively felt it might be worth giving the likes of Lowry a day or 2 at least, as there is a chance he is reading through it, and has a plan of action depending on what came out of it. It might be along the lines of him not being into cancel culture type reactions, and allowing due process to take its course to make a more informed decision later?
But, we'll see. No doubt if he doesn't ditch the sponsor now, he'll be asked more and more questions about it? So maybe we'll find out his reasoning either way
Mel Smooth
Hacker
This will be very watchable..
golfweek.usatoday.com
Exclusive: Rory McIlroy, Scottie Scheffler to face Bryson DeChambeau, Brooks Koepka in TV battle
Representatives of all four players confirmed their involvement to Golfweek.
golfweek.usatoday.com
BubbaP
Occasional Player of Golf
Pah, exhibition stuff, no history, meh
Pin-seeker
Well-known member
People will say they have no interest in it,but in reality will be obsessed,just like the LIV threadPah, exhibition stuff, no history, meh
