LIV Golf

Arthur Wedge

Well-known member
Joined
May 8, 2024
Messages
2,794
Location
Leighton Buzzard
Visit site
4 players getting £4mil each for 18 holes on a course that’s $1500 a round

Everything that’s wrong with the sport - bankrolled by no doubt the Saudi money

Just dripping of trying to buy it all

The “match” was bad and cringey enough - this will be no better. Can just imagine the faux banter now
 

HomerJSimpson

Hall of Famer
Joined
Aug 6, 2007
Messages
72,945
Location
Bracknell - Berkshire
Visit site
4 players getting £4mil each for 18 holes on a course that’s $1500 a round

Everything that’s wrong with the sport - bankrolled by no doubt the Saudi money

Just dripping of trying to buy it all

The “match” was bad and cringey enough - this will be no better. Can just imagine the faux banter now
A few players getting $4m they don't really need
 

Mel Smooth

Hacker
Joined
May 4, 2017
Messages
4,626
Visit site
4 players getting £4mil each for 18 holes on a course that’s $1500 a round

Everything that’s wrong with the sport - bankrolled by no doubt the Saudi money

Just dripping of trying to buy it all

The “match” was bad and cringey enough - this will be no better. Can just imagine the faux banter now


Where’s the source for the 4 millies each Phil?
 

Arthur Wedge

Well-known member
Joined
May 8, 2024
Messages
2,794
Location
Leighton Buzzard
Visit site
Where’s the source for the 4 millies each Phil?

“Further details emerged on Thursday when Dan Rapaport reported he had heard each player was guaranteed $4 million in appearance money - the same number victorious LIV golfers earn per event.”
 

Mel Smooth

Hacker
Joined
May 4, 2017
Messages
4,626
Visit site
I don't see any legal implications for the PGAT members in playing this event, whoever is promoting it. Maybe you could enlighten me.

PGAT players can play on a non conflicting date - and there aren’t many with the wrap around calendar, riight?

I’d think a half decent lawyer would use that as evidence in a monopoly argument at least.

Also, this is not really a legal point, but having two PGAT players, the two most famous outside of Tiger, on a LIV branded and produced piece of media, represents a significant step change in mens pro golf doesn’t it?
 
Last edited:

Arthur Wedge

Well-known member
Joined
May 8, 2024
Messages
2,794
Location
Leighton Buzzard
Visit site
PGAT players can play on a non conflicting date - and there aren’t many with the wrap around calendar, riight?

I’d think a half decent lawyer would use that as evidence in a monopoly argument at least.

Also, this is not really a legal point, but having two PGAT players, the two most famous outside of Tiger, on a LIV branded and produced piece of media, represents a significant step change in mens pro golf doesn’t it?

Not sure it will matter too much when the audience of that Liv branded account is that small the reach is very insignificant
 

Mel Smooth

Hacker
Joined
May 4, 2017
Messages
4,626
Visit site

“Further details emerged on Thursday when Dan Rapaport reported he had heard each player was guaranteed $4 million in appearance money - the same number victorious LIV golfers earn per event.”

Rapaport took down that information I believe as it was wrong.
 

doublebogey7

Head Pro
Joined
Nov 2, 2009
Messages
1,987
Location
Leicester
Visit site
PGAT players can play on a non conflicting date - and there aren’t many with the wrap around calendar, riight?

I’d think a half decent lawyer would use that as evidence in a monopoly argument at least.

Also, this is not really a legal point, but having two PGAT players, the two most famous outside of Tiger, on a LIV branded and produced piece of media, represents a significant step change in mens pro golf doesn’t it?
Of course, and you may or may not be right on the legalities of that, but what the hell has it got to do with this exhibition match.
 
Top