LIV Golf

Bucktaylor64

Medal Winner
Joined
Feb 21, 2013
Messages
106
Visit site
Rahm could give every person in Spain a set of golf clubs, membership at a club and as many lessons as they could ever want. He’d still have hundreds of millions left.

Let’s see how much he really wants to grow the game!
Many players could do similar! How many have?
 

RichA

Well-known member
Joined
Jan 24, 2021
Messages
3,895
Location
UK
Visit site
Rahm could give every person in Spain a set of golf clubs, membership at a club and as many lessons as they could ever want. He’d still have hundreds of millions left.

Let’s see how much he really wants to grow the game!
Are you sure about your maths there? I make it about £9.50 per person and he'd have nothing left.
 

Captain_Black.

Well-known member
Joined
Sep 13, 2022
Messages
454
Visit site
There are those who seem to enjoy LIV & look upon it as a breath of fresh air & there are those who view it as merely exhibition golf.

For me nothing beats the interest of who makes the cut, who is in the final groups on a Sunday, the thrill of watching who sinks the winning putt on the 18th.

If a LIV tournament was on near me, I'd have zero interest in attending.
I've watched it on UTube & it just leaves me cold.

I don't blame players for defecting for life changing money, but I do think that the tour will win out in the end.
 

Red devil

Well-known member
Joined
Sep 26, 2021
Messages
653
Visit site

evemccc

Well-known member
Joined
Mar 28, 2020
Messages
1,636
Visit site
If what is being reported is true, that Callaway have taken an equity stake in Jon Rahms team then that is HUGE news for Liv.

It would be the first global sports company to invest in a Liv Golf Franchise.

Been many rumours of Nike getting involved with Koepka's Smash team in the past.

Now that the PGAT have legitimised Liv it allows these companies to look at possible investment in Liv golf teams.
And that simply is the tipping point into ‘respectability’
 

Hobbit

Mordorator
Moderator
Joined
Sep 11, 2011
Messages
19,683
Location
Espana
Visit site
This is an excellent take on the current state of golf.


Some great aspects to the article but some holes in it too. Although it clearly makes mention of what the PGAT has done to the European tour, and lesser tours, down the years it fails to draw comparisons with Rahm’s defection to LIV to the fact that pro’s from around the world have been have been lured to the PGAT for years. Having enticed those pro’s it had a 15(?) event rule whereby they must play a minimum of 15(?) events on the PGAT. Ballesteros fell foul of the rule as he refused not to attend what he considered to be the European Tour’s blue ribbon events.

Where are those blue ribbon events now, and where are the pro’s that would have helped those events retain their status? And who forced through their scheduling, including restricting where those pro’s played?

I have no problem with pro’s chasing big money and ensuring their families don’t want for anything. I have little sympathy for the PGAT because of its own financial muscle it’s exerted on the lesser tours for donkey’s years - sauce for the goose.

My concern about LIV is what it might morph into if/when it becomes the dominant player.

And then there’s the moral issues in Saudi. What goes on there is not nice by any stretch of the imagination. There’s no getting away from that. Whatever improvements they have made are nowhere near close to being good enough. Should sport be used to fight for change, e.g. excluding them as South Africa was excluded? I’m not clever enough to determine how effective that would be. BUT if the moral arguments are going to be used, 56000 prisoners are on death row in the USA - I can’t remember how many were executed last year. Absolutely Saudi needs to change but so does the USA.
 

BubbaP

Occasional Player of Golf
Joined
Oct 26, 2011
Messages
5,715
Location
Oxfordshire
Visit site
This is an excellent take on the current state of golf.

Yeah, lots of decent points.

Also thought his earlier piece also had plenty
 

Swango1980

Well-known member
Joined
Jul 22, 2019
Messages
12,696
Location
Lincolnshire
Visit site
Some great aspects to the article but some holes in it too. Although it clearly makes mention of what the PGAT has done to the European tour, and lesser tours, down the years it fails to draw comparisons with Rahm’s defection to LIV to the fact that pro’s from around the world have been have been lured to the PGAT for years. Having enticed those pro’s it had a 15(?) event rule whereby they must play a minimum of 15(?) events on the PGAT. Ballesteros fell foul of the rule as he refused not to attend what he considered to be the European Tour’s blue ribbon events.

Where are those blue ribbon events now, and where are the pro’s that would have helped those events retain their status? And who forced through their scheduling, including restricting where those pro’s played?

I have no problem with pro’s chasing big money and ensuring their families don’t want for anything. I have little sympathy for the PGAT because of its own financial muscle it’s exerted on the lesser tours for donkey’s years - sauce for the goose.

My concern about LIV is what it might morph into if/when it becomes the dominant player.

And then there’s the moral issues in Saudi. What goes on there is not nice by any stretch of the imagination. There’s no getting away from that. Whatever improvements they have made are nowhere near close to being good enough. Should sport be used to fight for change, e.g. excluding them as South Africa was excluded? I’m not clever enough to determine how effective that would be. BUT if the moral arguments are going to be used, 56000 prisoners are on death row in the USA - I can’t remember how many were executed last year. Absolutely Saudi needs to change but so does the USA.
You almost make it sound like the other tours, like European Tour, are Saints. I'm pretty sure if they had the biggest audience and backing from sponsors, then they'd do everything to grow their own tour. They'd look to attract all the best global players, including Americans, onto their tour.

That is life. The PGAT aren't exactly doing anything nobody wouldn't expect. They've managed to generate huge interest in fans, got bigger and bigger broadcasting and sponsorship deals as a result and grown over the years. If it had been a bad thing, fans would hate it, they wouldn't have generated that revenue and they'd have failed.

The Premier League attracts more and more of the world's best players. Is that bad for football, or is it a sign that the Premier League has generated huge interest across the globe?
 
D

Deleted member 21445

Guest
Hard to believe that a definitive agreement is going to be achieved in 22 days.

With Rahm leaving, others rumoured to be going and long term sponsors like Wells Fargo announcing they are pulling out their sponsorship from the Tour.

Any potential PE investors will be concerned with these recent developments.

Also there is a DOJ anti trust investigation around previous behaviour still hanging over the tour.

All this leaves the PGAT on the back foot.
 

pokerjoke

Money List Winner
Joined
Nov 17, 2009
Messages
10,833
Location
Taunton ,Somerset
Visit site
Rahm could give every person in Spain a set of golf clubs, membership at a club and as many lessons as they could ever want. He’d still have hundreds of millions left.

Let’s see how much he really wants to grow the game!
Not one individual alone grows the game himself.
He probably has grown the game in Spain more but Spain already has others that have done it consistently over the years.
Globally Golf is always growing,it’s a great sport,mentally and physically.

There is so much money in golf ,even more now, but there’s always been 100s of millions.
Greed has always been there.
Someone is offering these players life changing amounts,it probably is very hard to turn down.
Unfortunately the gap between the top 20 and the rest is widening.
Chucking money at ridiculously wealthy golfers when others struggle is a sure fire way to widen the gap even more.
As I said yesterday I watch a lot less golf these days,purely down to not being able to watch Hypocritical players driven by greed.
As with Football when there’s too much money in sport the sport becomes secondary.
 

Mel Smooth

Hacker
Joined
May 4, 2017
Messages
4,683
Visit site
Hard to believe that a definitive agreement is going to be achieved in 22 days.

With Rahm leaving, others rumoured to be going and long term sponsors like Wells Fargo announcing they are pulling out their sponsorship from the Tour.

Any potential PE investors will be concerned with these recent developments.

Also there is a DOJ anti trust investigation around previous behaviour still hanging over the tour.

All this leaves the PGAT on the back foot.

The value of the PGAT is dropping to the the PIF / PE with each passing day.

Allegedly there was a Billion dollars on the table from the PIF as a settlement fund to the PGAT players for their loyalty to the tour - in addition to the 2 Billion already offered - but nothing came of the offer...

Finau the next to go across? Another popular player who draws a following.
 

D-S

Well-known member
Joined
Dec 31, 2020
Messages
3,901
Location
Bristol
Visit site
I think they (the Pros and the organisers) are lucky that the game of golf is currently still in a boom that has absolutely nothing to do with the Pro game whatsoever.

Rather than 'growing the game' this unseemly wrangling and greed between very rich men has turned more people off the Professional game.

The losers are the fans of the Professional game and the Professional game is fortunate that they don't have any real influence on clubs and normal golfers (the game of golf for most people) as, if they did, they would be shrinking it.
 

Barking_Mad

Well-known member
Joined
Aug 30, 2021
Messages
845
Visit site
This is an excellent take on the current state of golf.


Good piece.

It's just an unsavoury mess. These guys know the price of everything and the value of nothing. As the article says it's doubtful where the game is really being grown. It just looks like a splitting of fans into two groups, one being niche numbers in an event backed by Saudi billions.

For golfers already set up for life (and the generations of family coming after them) to make this out like they're joining to grow the game is so disingenuous it's barely worth commenting on.

Rahm is probably looking at $15m+ a year on just the interest alone, after tax. Not including any legal avoidance that's open to him.

He could give that interest away each year to good causes and do more to grow the game than playing 54 holes with some music playing in the background.

Just entitled, self absorbed idiots. YMMV.
 
Last edited:

Mel Smooth

Hacker
Joined
May 4, 2017
Messages
4,683
Visit site
Jon Rahm on the Fairway to Heaven podcast this week - explains the motives for his decision - and clearly knows and expects the criticism he’ll get.



 

Backsticks

Assistant Pro
Banned
Joined
Aug 7, 2012
Messages
3,852
Visit site
Jon Rahm on the Fairway to Heaven podcast this week - explains the motives for his decision - and clearly knows and expects the criticism he’ll get.



Does the motuve involve money ? Or is he really just smitten for playing team golf for the Toros or Chipbaits or whatever ?
 

PNWokingham

Journeyman Pro
Joined
Jun 20, 2010
Messages
3,572
Location
Berks
Visit site
Try harder, you’d have seen Rahm talk about how the money played a big part in his decision process. (y)

anybody who thinks money was not 99% of the reason for going is deluded. i can't fault him for that (i would probably do the same given that a tour merger/ harmony solution will innevitably follow soon) but a bit more honesty rather than a scripted showboating podcast would have won him more fans.
 

Swango1980

Well-known member
Joined
Jul 22, 2019
Messages
12,696
Location
Lincolnshire
Visit site
anybody who thinks money was not 99% of the reason for going is deluded. i can't fault him for that (i would probably do the same given that a tour merger/ harmony solution will innevitably follow soon) but a bit more honesty rather than a scripted showboating podcast would have won him more fans.
I think we all know it was 100% the reason

If LIV promised to match what he got on PGAT it would have been 100% no. If they offered him double what he earns on PGAT, it would have been 100% no.

But offer him 450 million, plus all winnings he is likely to earn, then they met his price. Presumably 300 or 400 million wasn't enough for him. From a business perspective he has to be given a pat on the back. From a golf perspective, cheerio Jon. Sad, but true
 
Top