Bdill93
Undisputed King of FOMO
Just buy OWGR, easy W
Only 5 or 6 have exemptions beyond the Masters, which doesn't include Gooch, Reed, Niemann, etc. And only the opens have a qualification route - there is no way of getting into either the Masters or PGA without an exemption or invitation.Anyone on LiV worth watching is already exempt for the time being.
There are ways of them getting in to the majors for any of them that aren’t already exempt. If they are good enough, they will qualify. How many were good enough to qualify this year?
They do. So we should just ignore they way they treat people because they throw a few quid at the woman’s game.The same people that sponsor the ARAMCO series, yeah?
Oosthuizen probably decided to rely on his exemption as a past champion.Don't forget that the likes of Westwood, Poulter, Casey, Oosthuizen didn't even bother to try to qualify for The Open.....kind of implies that they're not interested .
And one that was interested enough to try, Sergio wasn't good enough
Apologies..maybe it was Gooch or another....Oosthuizen probably decided to rely on his exemption as a past champion.
Only 5 or 6 have exemptions beyond the Masters, which doesn't include Gooch, Reed, Niemann, etc. And only the opens have a qualification route - there is no way of getting into either the Masters or PGA without an exemption or invitation.
They could, but that ignores why these exemptions (top-x in the OWGR, FEC, RtD, etc.) exist. It's about ensuring the best players are in the field and avoiding the one-day lottery of final qualifying.They could qualify for The Open, win it and then they are in the other majors for the next 5 years.
They could, but that ignores why these exemptions (top-x in the OWGR, FEC, RtD, etc.) exist. It's about ensuring the best players are in the field and avoiding the one-day lottery of final qualifying.
Not sure there’ll be many people rushing to see those 3 golfers unless you want to give Reed some stickOnly 5 or 6 have exemptions beyond the Masters, which doesn't include Gooch, Reed, Niemann, etc. And only the opens have a qualification route - there is no way of getting into either the Masters or PGA without an exemption or invitation.
Do you really not understand how this (or golf) works? If they are better than the rest ON THE DAY, they will qualify. But anyone, even the best players of all time, have bad days and miss cuts, nevermind miss the top 5-10 of the leaderboard. Stick the top-10 of the OWGR though qualifying and several wouldn't make it through. The majors want the strongest fields without the randomness of a one-day shootout - that is why these exemption categories were created.If they are better than the rest, they will qualify.
All I am hearing is excuses that its not fair. The players could quite easily take qualifying seriously and then do their best to prove that they are as good (or better) than everyone else. I dont think anybody is doubting that LIV have a few players who can hold their own at the top of the game, but it is genuinely a handful of players right now and I dont see how that has a measureable negative effect on the Majors.
That is the bed they made for themselves when they went to LIV though - isn't that the point? They went for more money and a lighter schedule, which is fine, but they knew there had to be a downside. If they have to qualify for a major then so be it, as long as they always have that opportunity to try and qualify.Do you really not understand how this (or golf) works? If they are better than the rest ON THE DAY, they will qualify. But anyone, even the best players of all time, have bad days and miss cuts, nevermind miss the top 5-10 of the leaderboard. Stick the top-10 of the OWGR though qualifying and several wouldn't make it through. The majors want the strongest fields without the randomness of a one-day shootout - that is why these exemption categories were created.
I thought we were talking about how to ensure the best players are playing in the majors. What has their (perceived) popularity got to do with that?Not sure there’ll be many people rushing to see those 3 golfers unless you want to give Reed some stick
So why did the majors just decide not to give LiV ranking points?Do you really not understand how this (or golf) works? If they are better than the rest ON THE DAY, they will qualify. But anyone, even the best players of all time, have bad days and miss cuts, nevermind miss the top 5-10 of the leaderboard. Stick the top-10 of the OWGR though qualifying and several wouldn't make it through. The majors want the strongest fields without the randomness of a one-day shootout - that is why these exemption categories were created.
Cause they, just like @SteveW86, clearly don't understand golf.So why did the majors just decide not to give LiV ranking points?
Unless they are going to give them exemptions another way.
Bryson saying the top 12 should get exemptions is laughable. Maybe 4 LiV players at a push once existing exemptions run out.
The LiV lot sound like a load of spoiled brats who are used to getting their own way. Now they are all putting out quotes about it.
They do. So we should just ignore they way they treat people because they throw a few quid at the woman’s game.
Do you really not understand how this (or golf) works? If they are better than the rest ON THE DAY, they will qualify. But anyone, even the best players of all time, have bad days and miss cuts, nevermind miss the top 5-10 of the leaderboard. Stick the top-10 of the OWGR though qualifying and several wouldn't make it through. The majors want the strongest fields without the randomness of a one-day shootout - that is why these exemption categories were created.
Politics. Other respected ranking systems (datagolf, tugr, etc.) manage to include LIV just fine.So why did the majors just decide not to give LiV ranking points?
Unless they are going to give them exemptions another way.
Bryson saying the top 12 should get exemptions is laughable. Maybe 4 LiV players at a push once existing exemptions run out.
The LiV lot sound like a load of spoiled brats who are used to getting their own way. Now they are all putting out quotes about it.
Not really. The real question is: how do the majors ensure their fields include the best players; not, how do the players ensure they get in the majors. The tour players choose to compete on should not be relevant.That is the bed they made for themselves when they went to LIV though - isn't that the point? They went for more money and a lighter schedule, which is fine, but they knew there had to be a downside. If they have to qualify for a major then so be it, as long as they always have that opportunity to try and qualify.
The majors have ensured their field includes the best players.Not really. The real question is: how do the majors ensure their fields include the best players; not, how do the players ensure they get in the majors. The tour players choose to compete on should not be relevant.