LIV Golf

Bdill93

Undisputed King of FOMO
Joined
Jun 18, 2020
Messages
5,585
Visit site
I just think it suggests he appreciates what the PGA tour has given him tbh 😂 the chance to build a legacy of his own. (And plenty of money too)

I don’t see Rahm jumping ship to be honest. Guys all about the history.

Plus - PIF surely aren’t going to finance a huge payout when they’re now merging the tours. Unless LIV does continue as normal after?
 

ColchesterFC

Journeyman Pro
Joined
Jan 28, 2013
Messages
7,234
Visit site
D

Deleted member 21445

Guest
I obviously hope he is OK but I suspect this is a start of a process for Jay to exit stage left..

His handling of this whole situation from the very beginning to end has frankly been very poor and he has now lost the support of the players.
 
D

Deleted member 1147

Guest
Not so long ago there discussions about quite a few LIVers not going for US Open qualifying. The suggestion on here was that they wouldn't have to, as they knew change was afoot.
What's the situation now? is Gooch in? etc
 

BubbaP

Occasional Player of Golf
Joined
Oct 26, 2011
Messages
5,711
Location
Oxfordshire
Visit site
Not so long ago there discussions about quite a few LIVers not going for US Open qualifying. The suggestion on here was that they wouldn't have to, as they knew change was afoot.
What's the situation now? is Gooch in? etc
Didn't see that suggestion, and as US Open is not run by PGAT then nothing is changing there I suspect.
Think Gooch may still be on hols..

 
Last edited:

AussieKB

Well-known member
Joined
Nov 10, 2020
Messages
1,145
Location
Australia
Visit site

Saudis expected to compensate PGA Tour loyalists who spurned LIV Golf's millions: report​


Players like Rory McIlroy, Scottie Scheffler and Jon Rahm said no to millions​


Surely they will turn down the blood money ??????
or are they first class hypocrites....

Makes for good doco I think.
 

Swango1980

Well-known member
Joined
Jul 22, 2019
Messages
12,690
Location
Lincolnshire
Visit site

Saudis expected to compensate PGA Tour loyalists who spurned LIV Golf's millions: report​


Players like Rory McIlroy, Scottie Scheffler and Jon Rahm said no to millions​


Surely they will turn down the blood money ??????
or are they first class hypocrites....

Makes for good doco I think.
Depends why they turned down the money in the 1st place. Given that a lot of them turned down the money because they wanted to remain on the PGAT where proper golf is played, then no. I assume a lot of them have "blood money" in their accounts anyway, as they've been to the Middle East before.

Of course, it is a convenient and lazy argument to make for keyboard warriors when they want to make snidey comments :)
 

BrianM

Head Pro
Moderator
Joined
Oct 29, 2013
Messages
5,569
Location
Inverness
Visit site
Depends why they turned down the money in the 1st place. Given that a lot of them turned down the money because they wanted to remain on the PGAT where proper golf is played, then no. I assume a lot of them have "blood money" in their accounts anyway, as they've been to the Middle East before.

Of course, it is a convenient and lazy argument to make for keyboard warriors when they want to make snidey comments :)

What's proper golf?
I'm pretty sure the object of the game is the same, you might know better than me though :)
As for the blood money argument, Rory has had no issue in the past accepting money from the Far East, so doubt this will make a difference to him.
The 3 players mentioned haven't mentioned anything about blood money to my knowledge.
What will be interesting is the players that have mentioned were the money is coming from have a sudden change of heart.
The players will always have a choice, maybe not an easy one but still, if they feel that strongly about it they will turn the 'compensation' money down.
 
D

Deleted member 21445

Guest
1st little snippet of info from the Liv side.

Yasser Al Rumayyan has told Dustin Johnson a Liv schedule continues in 2024 under a merger.

Also Chamblee and Mcginly say PGAT need this deal to happen because the PGAT can't sustain current purses.
Also said the worst thing that could happen for the PGAT is for the merger not to happen.

Doesn't sound like a position of strength like the PGAT is putting out there.?

As has been mentioned many times, the money holds the power..
 

Swango1980

Well-known member
Joined
Jul 22, 2019
Messages
12,690
Location
Lincolnshire
Visit site
What's proper golf?
I'm pretty sure the object of the game is the same, you might know better than me though :)
As for the blood money argument, Rory has had no issue in the past accepting money from the Far East, so doubt this will make a difference to him.
The 3 players mentioned haven't mentioned anything about blood money to my knowledge.
What will be interesting is the players that have mentioned were the money is coming from have a sudden change of heart.
The players will always have a choice, maybe not an easy one but still, if they feel that strongly about it they will turn the 'compensation' money down.
Apologies, I used "proper golf" as a pretty generic time, to keep the sentence shorter.

I meant they stayed on the PGAT simply because they were loyal to that tour. They felt that was the best place to play golf, the most competitive and testing, where the tradition lies and continue earning their ranking points and so on. As you mention, I don't remember the reasoning given by many players that they couldn't accept blood money, as I'm sure that could easily be thrown back in their face when they've been shown to be happy enough with it in the past. In other words, I think most / all of them turned down LIV for golfing reasons, not financial. Had PIF just invested in the PGAT from the start, I'm guessing they'd all have happily accepted the outcome if more money went into their pockets.
 

D-S

Well-known member
Joined
Dec 31, 2020
Messages
3,879
Location
Bristol
Visit site
Have the ‘loyal’ players actually earned less because of LIV?

Or did they elect for a variety of reasons - security, stability, politics, dislike of the format, potential to win more due to rivals no longer playing their events - (all possibly now dressed up as loyalty) opt just not to take someone else’s money?
 

Swango1980

Well-known member
Joined
Jul 22, 2019
Messages
12,690
Location
Lincolnshire
Visit site
Have the ‘loyal’ players actually earned less because of LIV?

Or did they elect for a variety of reasons - security, stability, politics, dislike of the format, potential to win more due to rivals no longer playing their events - (all possibly now dressed up as loyalty) opt just not to take someone else’s money?
I hardly think that would be a reason. They'd think they'd have more chance to win LIV events, a field of 48 with only a handful of good players.

Other reasons may be fair, but not sure what you mean dressed up as loyalty? I don't think "blind" loyalty was their reasoning. There are explanations for their loyalty, a few of which you covered.
 

D-S

Well-known member
Joined
Dec 31, 2020
Messages
3,879
Location
Bristol
Visit site
I hardly think that would be a reason. They'd think they'd have more chance to win LIV events, a field of 48 with only a handful of good players.

Other reasons may be fair, but not sure what you mean dressed up as loyalty? I don't think "blind" loyalty was their reasoning. There are explanations for their loyalty, a few of which you covered.
Perhaps it is just a definition of loyalty, to me it has some sort of noble self sacrificing aspect whereas the reasons for players not opting for LIV may well have been pure self interest- fear of the unknown, distrust, risk mitigation etc.
If they earned just as much (and perhaps more) by staying as they would have done anyway without LIV, there was no downside to staying.
 
Top