Are you sure ? think Phil has been proven right on a lot of things he said, plus their Bank Manager is laughing into his beer.
Even a broken clock is right twice a day.
www.foxsports.com.au
Very much like that article, and every other.
’Right all along’: How ‘menacing’ Phil scored his greatest victory in way only he could
’Right all along’: How ‘menacing’ Phil scored his greatest victory in way only he could
The PGA have no more money, then all of a sudden there are big purses and no cut tournaments.....ha ha
but everyone is allowed to put their own spin on it.....
IF the deal is finalised.......
The Hovland bit - and DJ character are pure class
And there's the rub.
Are you suggesting the loyalty card wont work a second time
Ok, I'll spell it out. Weir has made his feelings well known on this subject, and has consistently shown that he cannot be trusted to be objective or balanced - especially on Twitter.
In an interview does that matter. Aren't you listening to the words of the interviewee?
Previous mergers of sports leagues in the US have seen laws passed by Congress exempting them from existing antitrust laws to enable them to proceed. Given how insular the US is, this seems unlikely to happen when one of the parties is not American.
PGAT Players earn the right to play PGAT events; they are not employees. LIV players would, it seems, given what they signed up to, be employees. Individuals who signed for LIV contravened some of the rights they were to comply with and were suspended from the PGAT. The PGAT, as a non profit (!), have individuals that make decisions - both overarching and day to day (Board of Directors & Executive Team), supposedly supplemented by Player Advisory Directors and Player Advisory Council. So depending on how you want to interpret it, Dunne (or McIlroy 2.0 as Monahan calls him) essentially clarified the Player Directors and Players Council were not involved in the decision so that leaves around 16 individuals that were. That's 16 individuals that can be subjected to the same vitriolic questions, press conferences and ridicule the LIV defectors received. But also, given the rules and processes that should be followed, the Players Directors and Council should have been involved in the decision making process but, granted, not necessarily the decision. The fact they weren't consulted means the protocols have not been followed so there should be repercussions / suspensions for that (otherwise, why have Player Directors or Players Council?).
