• We'd like to take this opportunity to wish you a Happy Holidays and a very Merry Christmas from all at Golf Monthly. Thank you for sharing your 2025 with us!

LIV Golf

Backsticks said:
LIV is a special case though being a closed shop. You cannot rank golfers on just 4 tournaments a year when they are tested against the rest of the world. LIV exhibitions are unrankable. You cannot take yourself out of competing with the wider world, and then expect to be rated against them. It is a fundamental contradiction. LIVers just didnt think it through, or like Smith for example, didnt really care as long as the cheque was right. To each their own, but you cant have your cake and eat it.
Click to expand...
I care not whether they gain owgr points, but reflect for a moment from the owgr site -

A total of 147 eligible events across 24 Eligible Tours have taken place so far in 2023

They pride themselves in ranking players who don't play on just one tour!

At least three other ranking sites seem to be managing.

And who is only playing 4 tournaments outside of LIV?

Flawed thinking, yes seems so IMO
 
Backsticks said:
LIV is a special case though being a closed shop. You cannot rank golfers on just 4 tournaments a year when they are tested against the rest of the world. LIV exhibitions are unrankable. You cannot take yourself out of competing with the wider world, and then expect to be rated against them. It is a fundamental contradiction. LIVers just didnt think it through, or like Smith for example, didnt really care as long as the cheque was right. To each their own, but you cant have your cake and eat it.
Click to expand...
Except no-one is playing only LIV+majors; most are playing Asian Tour events, some are playing Australian events, etc.

Also, just a few weeks ago, an owgr board member confirmed the obvious - that mathematically, owgr can handle LIV events just fine - i.e. they are certainly not "unrankable".
 
IainP said:
I care not whether they gain owgr points, but reflect for a moment from the owgr site -

A total of 147 eligible events across 24 Eligible Tours have taken place so far in 2023

They pride themselves in ranking players who don't play on just one tour!

At least three other ranking sites seem to be managing.

And who is only playing 4 tournaments outside of LIV?

Flawed thinking, yes seems so IMO
Click to expand...
There is no real influx from any other tour onto LIV events. LIVers are playing little or no non LIV events. The overlap, qualifiers, mixing between tours and those coming on the scene or fading out of it, is completely lacking in LIV. It is golf off the grid. A ring fenced circus, that doesnt measure it players against potential peers. So they are almost unrankable. And given the cul-de-sac the have driven into, it shouldnt be a surprise its a no urgency topic for the OWGR to concern themselves with. Last year, it looked like it might be an issue - when people were suckered into the LIV PR puff about joiners from the top ranks, and unarguably top rank golfer might be excluded from majors due to their unrankability. But that has not happened. So its a non issue. No matter whether one likes or doesnt care for LIV, it has to be acknowledged there is a serious possibility that it has shot its bolt, missed, and will just fade out now.
 
Last edited:
wjemather said:
Except no-one is playing only LIV+majors; most are playing Asian Tour events, some are playing Australian events, etc.

Also, just a few weeks ago, an owgr board member confirmed the obvious - that mathematically, owgr can handle LIV events just fine - i.e. they are certainly not "unrankable".
Click to expand...
You can award owgr points sure. But with the weak field and no field mixing, there is little or no benchmarking with the other tours going on, making any points minimal and so not representative of the top golfers on LIV. Sure, Koepka should be a top 10 world golfer. But when a victory on LIV is really something between a Kornferry and Challenge tour win, he will never gain enough points to demonstrate his true standing.
 
IainP said:
I care not whether they gain owgr points, but reflect for a moment from the owgr site -

A total of 147 eligible events across 24 Eligible Tours have taken place so far in 2023

They pride themselves in ranking players who don't play on just one tour!

At least three other ranking sites seem to be managing.

And who is only playing 4 tournaments outside of LIV?

Flawed thinking, yes seems so IMO
Click to expand...


Guess the question is what happens next

Will LIV make any changes to their structure to allow their events to gain points


If they do get points at what level will they be at ? I guess it can’t be at the same level as the main tours


And if they do get some sort of points will the players stop playing in Asian Tour events ?

It’s very possible that the events that gain the most points will be the Asian Tour ones


Maybe LIV should take over the Asian Tour - and then have some “enhanced” events in the Asian Tour which are opened to players ranked high in the World Rankings and Asian Tour rankings
 
Backsticks said:
There is no real influx from any other tour onto LIV events. LIVers are playing little or no non LIV events. The overlap, qualifiers, mixing between tours and those coming on the scene or fading out of it, is completely lacking in LIV. It is golf off the grid. A ring fenced circus, that doesnt measure it players against potential peers. So they are almost unrankable. And given the cul-de-sac the have driven into, it shouldnt be a surprise its a no urgency topic for the OWGR to concern themselves with. Last year, it looked like it might be an issue - when people were suckered into the LIV PR puff about joiners from the top ranks, and unarguably top rank golfer might be excluded from majors due to their unrankability. But that has
Click to expand...
Guess you'll keep moving the goal posts..
3 non liv players (i.e. not the 48) teed it up in DC, but suppose facts don't suit the narrative.
The main tour memberships don't change much until the Q school at end of season.
Personally I don't expect the liv players to change a lot, but personally I'll wait to the end of the first actual year to make that judgement rather than 'crystal ball' it
 
Liverpoolphil said:
Guess the question is what happens next

Will LIV make any changes to their structure to allow their events to gain points


If they do get points at what level will they be at ? I guess it can’t be at the same level as the main tours


And if they do get some sort of points will the players stop playing in Asian Tour events ?

It’s very possible that the events that gain the most points will be the Asian Tour ones


Maybe LIV should take over the Asian Tour - and then have some “enhanced” events in the Asian Tour which are opened to players ranked high in the World Rankings and Asian Tour rankings
Click to expand...
Personally can't see them changing as they've invested in being that way.

If they ever receive points, they certainly wouldn't be at typical pgat level, and can't see players making big climbs but might have enough to prevent the sliding of last year. As we've learnt the last set of owgr changes have put high weighting on field size, if Jay sticks with the plans for smaller fields for the designated events then perhaps some algorithm tweaks may be forthcoming.

Believe we think similar re the Asian tour. The PIF event draws a decent field (I imagine the liv guys are 'encouraged'). Now the DPWT position is clarified the obvious move would be to bump up those international series events and tempt more to them.
 
Does the team aspect of LIV also create a problem in terms of OWGR rankings? If a player is on his final hole and knows that a two putt from 15ft will improve his teams position in the team event will he risk trying to hole the putt and potentially cost his team a lot of money? If it was every man for himself he'd be much more likely to have a run at it to try to jump himself up the leaderboard for a higher pay check.

I've got no idea if this would come into it or not but was just something I was thinking about last night.
 
ColchesterFC said:
Does the team aspect of LIV also create a problem in terms of OWGR rankings? If a player is on his final hole and knows that a two putt from 15ft will improve his teams position in the team event will he risk trying to hole the putt and potentially cost his team a lot of money? If it was every man for himself he'd be much more likely to have a run at it to try to jump himself up the leaderboard for a higher pay check.

I've got no idea if this would come into it or not but was just something I was thinking about last night.
Click to expand...
It is nuanced and if was team only then would think so, but the individual element has more wonga assigned to it, plus the individual standings also. Is it really any different to any pro thinking do I have a run for a birdie, or lag putt to avoid dropping down.
Can't imagine they use cheques any more 🙂
 
IainP said:
It is nuanced and if was team only then would think so, but the individual element has more wonga assigned to it, plus the individual standings also. Is it really any different to any pro thinking do I have a run for a birdie, or lag putt to avoid dropping down.
Can't imagine they use cheques any more 🙂
Click to expand...
Regards to latter part, it would be different to that. Are ranking points not based on position in field, rather than your actual score? So a player deciding to lag a putt is still focusing on his individual position within the field.

Whereas I think the question asked was related to a player focusing more on the team aspect than their individual placing. Perhaps they are not conteding individualy for the win, and so focus more on their scoring for the team, which may alter their final individual position.

I can't imagine such an issue would have any major consequences, but perhaps just another aspect that may be considered when team golf is involved?
 
Swango1980 said:
Regards to latter part, it would be different to that. Are ranking points not based on position in field, rather than your actual score? So a player deciding to lag a putt is still focusing on his individual position within the field.

Whereas I think the question asked was related to a player focusing more on the team aspect than their individual placing. Perhaps they are not conteding individualy for the win, and so focus more on their scoring for the team, which may alter their final individual position.

I can't imagine such an issue would have any major consequences, but perhaps just another aspect that may be considered when team golf is involved?
Click to expand...
Agree but the comparison I was trying to make, let's try an example - Rory is a couple back from the lead, he doesn't care about coming 2nd so is chasing pins - but it doesn't work out and he triples to finish 5th. Mr journeyman doesn't really think he can win so coasts in and jumps up to 2nd. Have the rankings been compromised?
Really I suspect pros just try and shoot the lowest they can whatever and let other stuff sort out. Think the spectators apply a lot if this other stuff to build interest.
 
IainP said:
Agree but the comparison I was trying to make, let's try an example - Rory is a couple back from the lead, he doesn't care about coming 2nd so is chasing pins - but it doesn't work out and he triples to finish 5th. Mr journeyman doesn't really think he can win so coasts in and jumps up to 2nd. Have the rankings been compromised?
Really I suspect pros just try and shoot the lowest they can whatever and let other stuff sort out. Think the spectators apply a lot if this other stuff to build interest.
Click to expand...
I suspect not. Because both players are still focused on their individual placing and doing as best they can. Rory by gambling, and trying to aim for first. The journeyman by trying to consolidate his current position. It's a bit like a risk and reward hole, but rather than taking the risk at a specific hole (or not), you are applying the same logic to your overall score in the closing holes.
 
Mel Smooth said:
golfweek.usatoday.com

CEO says Endeavor considered $1 billion investment in LIV Golf that would've replaced Saudi Arabia

Ari Emanuel, the chief executive officer of Endeavor – the parent company of UFC as well as talent agencies IMG and WME – recently joined Freakonomics Radio and discussed how the company considered a $1 billion investment in LIV G
golfweek.usatoday.com golfweek.usatoday.com
Click to expand...

in summary 2 LIV players approached the CEO, they had some discussions but decided not to invest because they have a good relationship with the PGAT and didn't want to jeopardise it.

Not particularly insightful, nothing on if it were a good investment, or what they thought of it as a company, just simply had a look at it and then didn't invest
 
Orikoru said:
What the hell... this is huge news isn't it? Where has that come from? It genuinely feels like an April Fool.
Click to expand...

I'm completely lost.. they have spent months fighting it...months throwing money at the tour to keep up

Then as you say is it April 1st???
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

N
Some information about a few clubs
Replies
4
Views
4K
nadiayorc
N
TheBionicGolfer
LIV Golf Invitational Ticket Prices
2 3
Replies
51
Views
9K
samthom99
S
Golfnut1957
Premier Golf League
Replies
14
Views
3K
Jigger
J
virtuocity
Custom Fitting- The Evidence Base (VERY long post)
4 5 6
Replies
108
Views
29K
Backsticks
Backsticks
Crazyface
Why Is Golf On The Decline?
8 9 10
Replies
194
Views
25K
sunshine
S
Top