Mel Smooth
Hacker
They simply can’t be the pinnacle events if there are players being denied entry because of where they play golf.Playing in the pinnacle events in the sport
All the suits at the majors will be fully aware of that as well.
They simply can’t be the pinnacle events if there are players being denied entry because of where they play golf.Playing in the pinnacle events in the sport
So what is the pinnacle of golf then?They simply can’t be the pinnacle events if there are players being denied entry because of where they play golf.
All the suits at the majors will be fully aware of that as well.
They simply can’t be the pinnacle events if there are players being denied entry because of where they play golf.
All the suits at the majors will be fully aware of that as well.
Playing in the pinnacle events in the sport
The fields are open to all the qualifying criteria is still the sameUntil the fiends are open to all I feel they’ve lost the tithe of pinnacle.
As we saw yesterday with the top if the crop from LIV and the PGA you have a great event, with the top liv players blocked in general from certain fields it’s impossible to label them pinnacle in my option. It’s more like the best of what’s left.
Unfortunately the introduction or birth of LIV has caused this, but it has also been compounded by the attitude of the PGA.
Unfortunately we are the golfing community are they ones who lose out
How did the Masters show Koepka et al. that they’re missing out on the John Deere Classic??
The majors will always be the majors without the LIV players.They simply can’t be the pinnacle events if there are players being denied entry because of where they play golf.
All the suits at the majors will be fully aware of that as well.
Except they are not 'being denied'! They chose to forgo the opportunity - at least for a while!They simply can’t be the pinnacle events if there are players being denied entry because of where they play golf.
...
LIV not being an 'approved tour' would likely hamper LIV members from qualifying! As would LIV's 'we are a league, not a tour' apparent attitude!My opinion is that most of the Liv players are playing for money. While the big names on the PGA Tour are playing for legacy. While Mickelson is in the HOF and Koepka, DJ and possibly Sergio will get in the Hall, the younger LIV players will have a harder time getting that honor. While three of the LIV players really performed well at the Masters, I wonder how they'll do in the other majors. My guess is Koepka and Cam Smith have a real shot at Oak Hill, LA and Liverpool. Having said that I wouldn't be surprised if some of the other top LIV players contend. Also, I predict that Viktor Hovland will win a major in the next two years.
That's just my opinion; I could be wrong.
Well, if you're going down that route the #6 player, the player who's a top 10 player, the guy who's par is 67 and a former Masters champion didn't do very well either...Justin Thomas, Homa and McIlroy, the three who the PGA Tour seem to be pinning their marketing hype on didn’t do very well..
Let’s pretend for a second Phil, Reed and Koepka were Rory and think about what the LiV PR team would be saying.
Brooks bottled it.
Phil had a back door top 10. He shot the lights out in the last round going for every shot when there was nothing on the line.
Patrick had another back door top ten, but bottled it on the last few holes when the pressure ramped up.
Is playing poorly classed as losing one’s bottle?And Rory didn’t bottle it in the early stages of the second round?
Let’s pretend for a second Phil, Reed and Koepka were Rory and think about what the LiV PR team would be saying.
Brooks bottled it.
Phil had a back door top 10. He shot the lights out in the last round going for every shot when there was nothing on the line.
Patrick had another back door top ten, but bottled it on the last few holes when the pressure ramped up.
And Rory didn’t bottle it in the second round?
This isn’t a Rory bash as he remains one of my favourites, but Phil’s and Patrick’s good form in the last round Shows they can still cut the cloth around Augusta, the same cannot be said for Rory.
LVP, i think it’s fair to say with the weather this year it was a completely different challenge.
From a PERSONAL view, Reed and Phil were far from in form coming in as complete underdogs. Rory was in form and didn’t even make the weekend show.
There’s a clear difference between Reed, Rory and Phil. Two have green jackets.
One misnomer is that 4 good rounds are required to win at Augusta.But it’s making judgments based on one tournament or even one round
If basing on Mickelson and Reed on previously winning at Augusta then fair enough but it’s all about one round of even one set of 9 holes
Rory missing the cut doesn’t mean he won’t ever win just as Reed and Mickleson having a good finish doesn’t mean they get back in the major winning circle again.
Form at times isn’t always relevant when it comes to majors , Rahm was falling out of form before the week.
Majors are always different and even more so The Masters
Rory has shown he can play very well around Augusta , he just needs to do it for four rounds. Same as if Reed and Mickelson are showing they are back etc they need to do it for more than one round