LIV Golf

D

Deleted member 29109

Guest
They simply can’t be the pinnacle events if there are players being denied entry because of where they play golf.

All the suits at the majors will be fully aware of that as well.
So what is the pinnacle of golf then?
 
D

Deleted member 15344

Guest
They simply can’t be the pinnacle events if there are players being denied entry because of where they play golf.

All the suits at the majors will be fully aware of that as well.


They are the pinnacle of the sport and they aren’t being “denied” entry because of where they play , not one LIV golfer has been “denied” entry into any major unless something else has happened
 

Oddsocks

Ryder Cup Winner
Joined
Jun 20, 2010
Messages
17,022
Location
Croydon, Surrey
Visit site
Playing in the pinnacle events in the sport

Until the fields are open to all I feel they’ve lost the title of pinnacle.

As we saw yesterday with the top if the crop from LIV and the PGA you have a great event, with the top liv players blocked in general from certain fields it’s impossible to label them pinnacle in my option. It’s more like the best of what’s left.

Unfortunately the introduction or birth of LIV has caused this, but it has also been compounded by the attitude of the PGA.

Unfortunately we are the golfing community are they ones who lose out
 
Last edited:
D

Deleted member 15344

Guest
Until the fiends are open to all I feel they’ve lost the tithe of pinnacle.

As we saw yesterday with the top if the crop from LIV and the PGA you have a great event, with the top liv players blocked in general from certain fields it’s impossible to label them pinnacle in my option. It’s more like the best of what’s left.

Unfortunately the introduction or birth of LIV has caused this, but it has also been compounded by the attitude of the PGA.

Unfortunately we are the golfing community are they ones who lose out
The fields are open to all 🤷‍♂️ the qualifying criteria is still the same

No one is blocked from gaining qualification into any of the majors


And the PGAT has nothing to do with any of the majors
 

Hoganman1

Well-known member
Joined
Nov 24, 2018
Messages
387
Visit site
My opinion is that most of the Liv players are playing for money. While the big names on the PGA Tour are playing for legacy. While Mickelson is in the HOF and Koepka, DJ and possibly Sergio will get in the Hall, the younger LIV players will have a harder time getting that honor. While three of the LIV players really performed well at the Masters, I wonder how they'll do in the other majors. My guess is Koepka and Cam Smith have a real shot at Oak Hill, LA and Liverpool. Having said that I wouldn't be surprised if some of the other top LIV players contend. Also, I predict that Viktor Hovland will win a major in the next two years.
That's just my opinion; I could be wrong.
 
D

Deleted member 21445

Guest
Jon Rahm proved he is the best golfer in the world.
Liv golfers put to bed the unfair and way off the mark critique that they don't care about competing in majors or winning. 3 Livers in the top 4, 12 out of 18 made the cut.
Phil Mickleson isn't over the hill after all - T2nd at age 52 and 65 final round is phenomenal.
Brooks will contend in majors going forward if he stays healthy
It was a great week for Liv Golf.
The majors know a solution to Liv Golfers path into majors has to be found because simply it's not the best playing the best otherwise which is what the majors are all about.
Bennett did the amatuer ranks proud and more.
Magnolia drive seems to have a funny effect on Rory.
 

IJames

Active member
Joined
Mar 26, 2023
Messages
211
Visit site
My opinion is that most of the Liv players are playing for money. While the big names on the PGA Tour are playing for legacy. While Mickelson is in the HOF and Koepka, DJ and possibly Sergio will get in the Hall, the younger LIV players will have a harder time getting that honor. While three of the LIV players really performed well at the Masters, I wonder how they'll do in the other majors. My guess is Koepka and Cam Smith have a real shot at Oak Hill, LA and Liverpool. Having said that I wouldn't be surprised if some of the other top LIV players contend. Also, I predict that Viktor Hovland will win a major in the next two years.
That's just my opinion; I could be wrong.
LIV not being an 'approved tour' would likely hamper LIV members from qualifying! As would LIV's 'we are a league, not a tour' apparent attitude!
 
Last edited:

Imurg

The Grinder Of Pars (Semi Crocked)
Joined
Mar 15, 2008
Messages
37,698
Location
Aylesbury Bucks
Visit site
Justin Thomas, Homa and McIlroy, the three who the PGA Tour seem to be pinning their marketing hype on didn’t do very well..
Well, if you're going down that route the #6 player, the player who's a top 10 player, the guy who's par is 67 and a former Masters champion didn't do very well either...
18 qualified - that means 30+ that didn't....and those are the ones that are either on the slide or simply not good enough.if things stay as they are the 2024 Masters will be the last that Brooks will qualify for.....
The LIV boys are missing out on the Genesis, the Players, Phoenix, API and the like...almost mini-majors with, historically, pretty decent fields.
Unless Greg told them all a bunch of massive porkies they knew exactly the consequences of what they were doing.
They've made their bed and they've got to lie in it now...
 
D

Deleted member 29109

Guest
Let’s pretend for a second Phil, Reed and Koepka were Rory and think about what the LiV PR team would be saying.

Brooks bottled it.

Phil had a back door top 10. He shot the lights out in the last round going for every shot when there was nothing on the line.

Patrick had another back door top ten, but bottled it on the last few holes when the pressure ramped up.
 
D

Deleted member 1147

Guest
Let’s pretend for a second Phil, Reed and Koepka were Rory and think about what the LiV PR team would be saying.

Brooks bottled it.

Phil had a back door top 10. He shot the lights out in the last round going for every shot when there was nothing on the line.

Patrick had another back door top ten, but bottled it on the last few holes when the pressure ramped up.
And Rory didn’t bottle it in the early stages of the second round?
Is playing poorly classed as losing one’s bottle?
If so, over half the field do that every week.
 

Oddsocks

Ryder Cup Winner
Joined
Jun 20, 2010
Messages
17,022
Location
Croydon, Surrey
Visit site
Let’s pretend for a second Phil, Reed and Koepka were Rory and think about what the LiV PR team would be saying.

Brooks bottled it.

Phil had a back door top 10. He shot the lights out in the last round going for every shot when there was nothing on the line.

Patrick had another back door top ten, but bottled it on the last few holes when the pressure ramped up.

And Rory didn’t bottle it in the second round?

This isn’t a Rory bash as he remains one of my favourites, but Phil’s and Patrick’s good form in the last round Shows they can still cut the cloth around Augusta, the same cannot be said for Rory.
 
D

Deleted member 15344

Guest
And Rory didn’t bottle it in the second round?

This isn’t a Rory bash as he remains one of my favourites, but Phil’s and Patrick’s good form in the last round Shows they can still cut the cloth around Augusta, the same cannot be said for Rory.

Mickleson shot a 65 to end up 8 under and finish 2nd

Reed shot a 68 to finish 4th

Last year Rory shot a 64 to end up 7 under and finish 2nd

Why do Reeds and Mickleson good rounds shows they can cut to cloth around Augusta yet Rory’s doesn’t


What exactly did Rory bottle ? He was never ahead of anyone and struggled all game


Koepka was 12 under ahead by 2 and lost by 4 , the last person to do that was Norman in 1996 and that’s called one of the worst bottle jobs.
 

Mel Smooth

Hacker
Joined
May 4, 2017
Messages
4,655
Visit site
The thing with Rory is - he played a couple of practice rounds at Augusta a couple of weeks back, and was crowing about how well he'd played. He sets himself up for it everytime.
 

Oddsocks

Ryder Cup Winner
Joined
Jun 20, 2010
Messages
17,022
Location
Croydon, Surrey
Visit site
LVP, i think it’s fair to say with the weather this year it was a completely different challenge.

From a PERSONAL view, Reed and Phil were far from in form coming in as complete underdogs. Rory was in form and didn’t even make the weekend show.

There’s a clear difference between Reed, Rory and Phil. Two have green jackets.
 
D

Deleted member 15344

Guest
LVP, i think it’s fair to say with the weather this year it was a completely different challenge.

From a PERSONAL view, Reed and Phil were far from in form coming in as complete underdogs. Rory was in form and didn’t even make the weekend show.

There’s a clear difference between Reed, Rory and Phil. Two have green jackets.


But it’s making judgments based on one tournament or even one round

If basing on Mickelson and Reed on previously winning at Augusta then fair enough but it’s all about one round of even one set of 9 holes

Rory missing the cut doesn’t mean he won’t ever win just as Reed and Mickleson having a good finish doesn’t mean they get back in the major winning circle again.


Form at times isn’t always relevant when it comes to majors , Rahm was falling out of form before the week.

Majors are always different and even more so The Masters


Rory has shown he can play very well around Augusta , he just needs to do it for four rounds. Same as if Reed and Mickelson are showing they are back etc they need to do it for more than one round
 
D

Deleted member 1147

Guest
But it’s making judgments based on one tournament or even one round

If basing on Mickelson and Reed on previously winning at Augusta then fair enough but it’s all about one round of even one set of 9 holes

Rory missing the cut doesn’t mean he won’t ever win just as Reed and Mickleson having a good finish doesn’t mean they get back in the major winning circle again.


Form at times isn’t always relevant when it comes to majors , Rahm was falling out of form before the week.

Majors are always different and even more so The Masters


Rory has shown he can play very well around Augusta , he just needs to do it for four rounds. Same as if Reed and Mickelson are showing they are back etc they need to do it for more than one round
One misnomer is that 4 good rounds are required to win at Augusta.
Only once, Cam Smith in 2020, has anyone actually had 4 rounds in The 60’s (and he didn’t even win).
So 4 good to steady rounds are required.


Rory didn’t big himself up, others did.

He has as much chance as anyone, but, just like thousands of others, it’s entirely possible he won’t win a green jacket.
 
Top