Mel Smooth
Hacker
Mel, would you list out your top five weaknesses/problems, with the LIV proposition as it is today ?
In what context?
Mel, would you list out your top five weaknesses/problems, with the LIV proposition as it is today ?
Ok - in the heads up to 2015 when there was a European in charge this is what was happening to the European Tour
All the best players leaving
Tournaments being cancelled
Sponsers leaving
We used to have the likes of British Masters , Johnny Walker , Welsh Open , Matchplay
They are we’re gone by 2015 - under the leadership of a European
Pelly took over 2015
British Masters returned
Wales Open
Hero Open ( scotland )
Cazoo Masters ( England )
The sponsership and prize money has increased significantly over those 7 years and will continue to increase
Even the best PGA players are coming over to play in events on the ET
The Rolex series created
And Co sanctioned events with the PGAT for the likes of the Scottish Open having its strongest field ever
More events on mainland Europe
So what are these “better” decisions that a passionate European could have done that would have changed the fortunes of the ET to enable it to compete against the PGAT ?
Nothing is perfect but the biggest golf market is the US - it stands to reason that the tour there is going to be the biggest
Not giving free passage to the top 10 year on year to devalue your product further each year. That is the biggest decision that would never have been agreed to under previous regimes.
Lunacy.
So how could Pelley have stopped it even if he had wanted to? The rules for Qualifying for a tour are in the hands of that tour, if the PGAT decide one of the rules would be to finish top 10 on another tour, I don't see how that other tour could stop it. Better to agree and get concessions in return than to sit on your hands waiting for t just to happen.Not giving free passage to the top 10 year on year to devalue your product further each year. That is the biggest decision that would never have been agreed to under previous regimes.
Lunacy.
So how could Pelley have stopped it even if he had wanted to? The rules for Qualifying for a tour are in the hands of that tour, if the PGAT decide one of the rules would be to finish top 10 on another tour, I don't see how that other tour could stop it. Better to agree and get concessions in return than to sit on your hands waiting for t just to happen.
PGA - we're losing some guys to LIV let's try and plug it by making it easier to poach the best talent from other tours. I know we'll tell Pelley we're taking his best. Great idea he'll agree to that without a fight.
No smoke without fire - there are rumours of disheartened players and ex Ryder Cup captains questioning his decisions. He's firefighting as it is.
So what would someone else had done differently since 2015 ?
Under the previous regime tournaments were being lost due to a lack of sponsorship
Players already jumping ship as soon as they could
Are you just concentrating on those ten players that gain Tour cards - what about all the other improvements made over the last 7 years
And the two players vocal about the changes - Westwood and Garcia ?! Same Garcia and Westwood who took up PGA membership whenever they could and the same players who jumped ship to LIV
For me, 100% yes. I'm not saying Westwood's collapse would not have hurt. But, it would have simply hurt in the same way it would hurt me collapsing in a monthly medal, and losing out on a bit more prize money to be spent in pro shop. Obviously might hurt a bit more than that, as he has people watching him and so his collapse is very public, in comparison.Hmmmm,
So the capitulation of Willet last night was entertaining because it was on the main Tour yet the capitulation of Westwood at the previous LIV Tournament wasn't??
I guess we all watch golf for different reasons and see entertainment differently. An exciting climax is always good as is watching someone who is in total control of his swing and ball aka Smith yesterday.
The perception that it's better because it was on the PGA is not one I quite grasp but each to their own. Quality golf is quality golf. I actually find myself migrating more to the LPGA Tour now for entertainment.
Every regime has had tournaments lost due to sponsorship and every regime has had new tournaments due to new sponsorship opportunities.
Gaining and losing is no consequence of who is running the Tour, its financial, economical and political factors that decide or effect sponsorship. Even back in the days of B&H and other tobacco sponsorships.
Undervaluing and selling yourself to side with the PGA over a perceived threat by Liv while weakening your product is laughable.
I've genuinely no idea on the numbers or how they'd be worked out, but do believe the "not on tv" thing is largely a UK & USA conversation. Think it has been on tv in quite a few countries. Edit, link below..56k watching this last night.
Theres no chance of 800million deals for teams for those kinds of numbers.
There can be talk of growing the game and getting a new audience. I wager the majority of people watching are older golf fans looking to see their old favourites play.
Where are all these new viewers?
Is LIV not business in the way that advertising is a business. It is an investment in the credibility, acceptibility, and normalising of Saudi Arabia for a post-oil era?
Viewing figures going down suggests there isn’t much appetite for louder golf.
View attachment 44390
Ok - in the heads up to 2015 when there was a European in charge this is what was happening to the European Tour
All the best players leaving
Tournaments being cancelled
Sponsers leaving
We used to have the likes of British Masters , Johnny Walker , Welsh Open , Matchplay
They are we’re gone by 2015 - under the leadership of a European
Pelly took over 2015
British Masters returned
Wales Open
Hero Open ( scotland )
Cazoo Masters ( England )
The sponsership and prize money has increased significantly over those 7 years and will continue to increase
Even the best PGA players are coming over to play in events on the ET
The Rolex series created
And Co sanctioned events with the PGAT for the likes of the Scottish Open having its strongest field ever
More events on mainland Europe
So what are these “better” decisions that a passionate European could have done that would have changed the fortunes of the ET to enable it to compete against the PGAT ?
Nothing is perfect but the biggest golf market is the US - it stands to reason that the tour there is going to be the biggest
In the context of being a viable, entertaining, and competitive golf tour.In what context?
Its no different.How is that different to all of the Dubai and UAE-backed sports events for the last 20 years?