LIV Golf

Jacko_G

Blackballed
Joined
Jul 13, 2015
Messages
7,028
Visit site
Ok - in the heads up to 2015 when there was a European in charge this is what was happening to the European Tour

All the best players leaving
Tournaments being cancelled
Sponsers leaving

We used to have the likes of British Masters , Johnny Walker , Welsh Open , Matchplay

They are we’re gone by 2015 - under the leadership of a European

Pelly took over 2015

British Masters returned
Wales Open
Hero Open ( scotland )
Cazoo Masters ( England )

The sponsership and prize money has increased significantly over those 7 years and will continue to increase

Even the best PGA players are coming over to play in events on the ET

The Rolex series created

And Co sanctioned events with the PGAT for the likes of the Scottish Open having its strongest field ever

More events on mainland Europe

So what are these “better” decisions that a passionate European could have done that would have changed the fortunes of the ET to enable it to compete against the PGAT ?

Nothing is perfect but the biggest golf market is the US - it stands to reason that the tour there is going to be the biggest

Not giving free passage to the top 10 year on year to devalue your product further each year. That is the biggest decision that would never have been agreed to under previous regimes.

Lunacy.
 
D

Deleted member 15344

Guest
Not giving free passage to the top 10 year on year to devalue your product further each year. That is the biggest decision that would never have been agreed to under previous regimes.

Lunacy.

Who replaces those ten ? Players coming through from the Tour School and those ten don’t have to take it up , and they could be back in a year and it’s highly likely the top players would have moved anyway - it’s going to improve the likes of MacIntyre as players by playing alongside all the best in the world and no better preparation for the majors

There is also the chance for PGA players to come across

What else could they have done , that’s part of getting an alliance between the two - you can focus on that one issue where as the players and many other can focus on all the other improvements made toward the ET

But certainly would be interested in finding out what could have been done differently to try and improve the fortunes of the ET which we’re going rapidly downhill under those previous regimes you allude too
 

garyinderry

Ryder Cup Winner
Joined
Jan 7, 2012
Messages
13,284
Visit site
56k watching this last night.

Theres no chance of 800million deals for teams for those kinds of numbers.

There can be talk of growing the game and getting a new audience. I wager the majority of people watching are older golf fans looking to see their old favourites play.

Where are all these new viewers?
 

doublebogey7

Head Pro
Joined
Nov 2, 2009
Messages
1,997
Location
Leicester
Visit site
Not giving free passage to the top 10 year on year to devalue your product further each year. That is the biggest decision that would never have been agreed to under previous regimes.

Lunacy.
So how could Pelley have stopped it even if he had wanted to? The rules for Qualifying for a tour are in the hands of that tour, if the PGAT decide one of the rules would be to finish top 10 on another tour, I don't see how that other tour could stop it. Better to agree and get concessions in return than to sit on your hands waiting for t just to happen.
 

Jacko_G

Blackballed
Joined
Jul 13, 2015
Messages
7,028
Visit site
So how could Pelley have stopped it even if he had wanted to? The rules for Qualifying for a tour are in the hands of that tour, if the PGAT decide one of the rules would be to finish top 10 on another tour, I don't see how that other tour could stop it. Better to agree and get concessions in return than to sit on your hands waiting for t just to happen.


PGA - we're losing some guys to LIV let's try and plug it by making it easier to poach the best talent from other tours. I know we'll tell Pelley we're taking his best. Great idea he'll agree to that without a fight.

No smoke without fire - there are rumours of disheartened players and ex Ryder Cup captains questioning his decisions. He's firefighting as it is.
 
D

Deleted member 15344

Guest
PGA - we're losing some guys to LIV let's try and plug it by making it easier to poach the best talent from other tours. I know we'll tell Pelley we're taking his best. Great idea he'll agree to that without a fight.

No smoke without fire - there are rumours of disheartened players and ex Ryder Cup captains questioning his decisions. He's firefighting as it is.

So what would someone else had done differently since 2015 ?

Under the previous regime tournaments were being lost due to a lack of sponsorship

Players already jumping ship as soon as they could

Are you just concentrating on those ten players that gain Tour cards - what about all the other improvements made over the last 7 years

And the two players vocal about the changes - Westwood and Garcia ?! Same Garcia and Westwood who took up PGA membership whenever they could and the same players who jumped ship to LIV
 

Jacko_G

Blackballed
Joined
Jul 13, 2015
Messages
7,028
Visit site
So what would someone else had done differently since 2015 ?

Under the previous regime tournaments were being lost due to a lack of sponsorship

Players already jumping ship as soon as they could

Are you just concentrating on those ten players that gain Tour cards - what about all the other improvements made over the last 7 years

And the two players vocal about the changes - Westwood and Garcia ?! Same Garcia and Westwood who took up PGA membership whenever they could and the same players who jumped ship to LIV

Every regime has had tournaments lost due to sponsorship and every regime has had new tournaments due to new sponsorship opportunities.

Gaining and losing is no consequence of who is running the Tour, its financial, economical and political factors that decide or effect sponsorship. Even back in the days of B&H and other tobacco sponsorships.

Undervaluing and selling yourself to side with the PGA over a perceived threat by Liv while weakening your product is laughable.
 

Swango1980

Well-known member
Joined
Jul 22, 2019
Messages
12,696
Location
Lincolnshire
Visit site
Hmmmm,

So the capitulation of Willet last night was entertaining because it was on the main Tour yet the capitulation of Westwood at the previous LIV Tournament wasn't??

I guess we all watch golf for different reasons and see entertainment differently. An exciting climax is always good as is watching someone who is in total control of his swing and ball aka Smith yesterday.

The perception that it's better because it was on the PGA is not one I quite grasp but each to their own. Quality golf is quality golf. I actually find myself migrating more to the LPGA Tour now for entertainment.
For me, 100% yes. I'm not saying Westwood's collapse would not have hurt. But, it would have simply hurt in the same way it would hurt me collapsing in a monthly medal, and losing out on a bit more prize money to be spent in pro shop. Obviously might hurt a bit more than that, as he has people watching him and so his collapse is very public, in comparison.

But Willet's collapse has other things at stake, that are simply not relevant in Westwood's case.

If, in Charity Aid, England conceded a last minute losing goal to Germany, of course it would be a bummer for the English players and fans. But, it wouldn't really hurt that much. Yet, if it was in the World Cup final, I'd be willing to bet it would hurt much much much more. Just another game of football, yet nothing alike in terms of engagement with fans.
 
D

Deleted member 15344

Guest
Every regime has had tournaments lost due to sponsorship and every regime has had new tournaments due to new sponsorship opportunities.

Gaining and losing is no consequence of who is running the Tour, its financial, economical and political factors that decide or effect sponsorship. Even back in the days of B&H and other tobacco sponsorships.

Undervaluing and selling yourself to side with the PGA over a perceived threat by Liv while weakening your product is laughable.

When they lost tobacco sponsership the tour events still kept going - the ET has never and never will be able to compete with the PGAT , any top players that wants to win and challenge for the majors consistently will be moving to the PGAT

The alliance with the PGAT started in 2021 before LIV came around

https://www.europeantour.com/dpworl...ounce-details-of-historic-strategic-alliance/

What else could the ET do ? It doesn’t have the backing or standing on its own , if the players don’t go to the PGA then they go to LIV

So what should they have done

It’s ok to constantly be critical of the decision but what’s alternative
 

BubbaP

Occasional Player of Golf
Joined
Oct 26, 2011
Messages
5,715
Location
Oxfordshire
Visit site
56k watching this last night.

Theres no chance of 800million deals for teams for those kinds of numbers.

There can be talk of growing the game and getting a new audience. I wager the majority of people watching are older golf fans looking to see their old favourites play.

Where are all these new viewers?
I've genuinely no idea on the numbers or how they'd be worked out, but do believe the "not on tv" thing is largely a UK & USA conversation. Think it has been on tv in quite a few countries. Edit, link below..
https://www.livgolf.com/how-to-watch
Is also on the website and FB, expect probably they don't show on the YT numbers either.
Those deal numbers do sound too high though ?
 
D

Deleted member 21445

Guest
The last 2 LIV events have really stepped up as a viewing experience and quality of product..

I committed to watching all 3 rounds of the last 2 events which is easier to do with a shotgun start (Less Time)
The standard of golf has been top draw which couldn't be said for the first few events to be honest.
Love the fact they didn't water the greens before the final day so they firmed up and made it really tough if you missed the fairway and not target golf like you tend to get in the USA events

The reason for the better experience is simply the improvement in the overall quality of the field, more top players and less players you haven't heard of.
Also the big names of BDC and Phil M are starting to get back nearer to their best, Brooks is still struggling a bit.
Peter Uihlein who I have never heard of really held his own yesterday playing with DJ and Cam Smith for a fantastic 2nd place, fair play to him and that cheque changes his life I would have thought.

Dare I say I'm starting to get my head round the team format and last night really wanted anyone but the 4 aces to win again.
The team format is great for keeping players focused and playing for something even when they are well out of contention for the individual prize which I think is a really good thing.

Also having watched the last 2 events these guys are not going through the motions, they want to win these events as much as the PGA Tour events because they are professional sportsman.

If you took time to watch a whole event you would see that clear as day..

I totally understand its not for everyone but I have to say I have really enjoyed watching it and only see the field and product getting stronger.
 
D

Deleted member 29109

Guest
Viewing figures going down suggests there isn’t much appetite for louder golf.

FCDE61E6-9777-4A36-BA12-04B47EDEC326.jpeg
 

pokerjoke

Money List Winner
Joined
Nov 17, 2009
Messages
10,833
Location
Taunton ,Somerset
Visit site
Ok - in the heads up to 2015 when there was a European in charge this is what was happening to the European Tour

All the best players leaving
Tournaments being cancelled
Sponsers leaving

We used to have the likes of British Masters , Johnny Walker , Welsh Open , Matchplay

They are we’re gone by 2015 - under the leadership of a European

Pelly took over 2015

British Masters returned
Wales Open
Hero Open ( scotland )
Cazoo Masters ( England )

The sponsership and prize money has increased significantly over those 7 years and will continue to increase

Even the best PGA players are coming over to play in events on the ET

The Rolex series created

And Co sanctioned events with the PGAT for the likes of the Scottish Open having its strongest field ever

More events on mainland Europe

So what are these “better” decisions that a passionate European could have done that would have changed the fortunes of the ET to enable it to compete against the PGAT ?

Nothing is perfect but the biggest golf market is the US - it stands to reason that the tour there is going to be the biggest

Can anyone find a post from a few years back when LP absolutely slated Pelley.
Now all of a sudden he’s the saviour ??‍♂️
 
Top