Blue in Munich
Crocked Professional Yeti Impersonator
I confess, what little I did see of the first event didn't make me want more, and like you an invitation field isn't what I want to watch. I haven't bothered to get into the arguements between all the different parties, my life is too full and busy for that, but I wouldn't be suprised if falsehoods and counter claims were flying about, especially where money is concerned.
The Hundred, I get your point, but it has put cricket ( or a form of it) into a family/kids enviroment that hopefully will mean more boys and girls taking up the game. I know my wife is more interested in the Hundred, than say an ODI or Test match. But I do see your point, and have some agreement with you on it.
We watch it on BBC, so are Peterson free
My point about The Hundred wasn't the cricket itself, purely the hideous graphics and motormouth commentary. Wasn't aware it was on the BBC so I'll look out for it there, and like your Mrs, Mrs BiM would be prepared to give The Hundred or a T20 game a run.
The porkies relate more to the flannel about playing less when LIV is signing them up to one less tournament than the PGA, less travel when they'll be off to Asia and the Middle East more than they'd need to with the PGA Tour and growing the game, which of course they couldn't do on the PGA Tour with the First Tee programme.
I think Richard Bland was fairly open about his reasons for going, others not so much. And I wouldn't disagree with your point about both sides not being entirely honest in their claims.