Marshy77
Journeyman Pro
You guys need to read George Orwell
Which tour does he play on?
You guys need to read George Orwell
Did he who is that
Which tour does he play on?
So a claim that you can't/won't verify. Doesn't strike me as a very good approach.Gonna be honest here Ethan, I don't know. I could go and look them up, but I'm not doing that for the benefit for the likes of you, RR, and Liverpoolphl.
I know Ogletree was out after London, and off the top of my head I think the 15 year old Chantananawut is out - although he did play in the the Junior Open a couple of weeks back where he finished 2nd.
Good one ?Which tour does he play on?
So a claim that you can't/won't verify. Doesn't strike me as a very good approach.
Ditching Ogletree could well have been an expensive exercise. There were reports of his contract being worth 200 million. He did come last at Centurion though. I haven't saan anything about him being accepted back into The PGA Tour though. That's something that would be pretty big news.
Chantananawut's participation in the Junior Open had no Tour implications, as it's an R&A event, just as the imminent US Junior Open is a USGA one.
LIV's SA masters strategy with the Asian Tour is a pretty smart one. Basically buying a tour that can award OWGR points, albeit not at a high rate currently. If LIV stacks some events with some of its top players, the soon to be implemented changes wrt 'field rating' could help.
I wouldn't have thought so either, but who knows given what exaggeration and plain rubbish has been spouted wrt LIV.Lol, there is no way on gods green earth that Ogletree was given a contract worth 200 million,I won't ask you to verify it.
His last event on the PGA Tour was in January, and one of his grievances with the PGA tour was he wasn't getting the opportunities he felt he deserved - but he definitely wouldn't have been expecting to be back playing PGA Tour events right now.
Inclined to agree, but wonder if the bookies around the globe would agree...I dont understand why professional golf needs another tour and especially one with a format that LIV are selling. Its not something that i'd be willing to pay to watch.
If the money wasnt so good there wouldn't be no discussion.
And it’s winding you up isn’t it?
So it seems in keep with slot of Luther big signings, Mr Stenson lost his long term sponsor A Mutual Of Omaha. Obvious he is not the first big signing to lose a sponsor, the most recent headline was DeShambles losing Bridgestone.
I’m curious as to the reasoning behind people losing sponsors because of the series. Is it because they feel they will not get the value of their investment through less events and less air time or simply because the prefer to be represented on the main tours?
It’s quite strange as there are rumours adidas are trying to buy a team name for $1bil.
Do you mean you are just trolling ?
Anyway, no, but its worth pointing out a claim you have repeatedly failed to back up.
Different sponsors have different attitudes. Mutual of Omaha (a US insurance company) presumably thinks the association will harm their brand. Whether or not you think the Saudi royal family had anything to do with 9/11 or not, it does disquiet some Americans, so the association is toxic.
Is it simply American based sponsors dropping?
Bridgestone are Japanese.
It’s interesting to see why some sponsors have run a mile and others have stayed committed.
Bridgestone are Japanese.
So with big brands walking away (example Bridgestone) is now the time for smaller brands like vice to sweep in and support this tour from early stages. There seems a great opportunity for newer or less established brands
The USP of companies like Vice & Benross is that they can cut their costs and sell at lower prices because they cut out sponsorship; why would they now turn that on its head?