LIV Golf

D

Deleted member 1147

Guest
It may be unpopular, but I do think caddies should be given food. Everyone has to eat.
My employer doesn’t give me food.
why is a caddy different?

They tie there own success to their player.
If they want better they could always get a more successful bag.
 

PJ87

Journeyman Pro
Joined
Apr 1, 2016
Messages
21,529
Location
Havering
Visit site
My employer doesn’t give me food.
why is a caddy different?

They tie there own success to their player.
If they want better they could always get a more successful bag.

Their are many professions that require workers to be away from home to provide food and board plus cover travel.

Majority of professions will cover these expenses

If you go to a fixed place of work they usually dont provide these.

As a rule of thumb.
 

BubbaP

Occasional Player of Golf
Joined
Oct 26, 2011
Messages
5,703
Location
Oxfordshire
Visit site
Why were there no cries about how terrible the PGA Tour is before the Saudis started handing out $$$$?
I have zero interest in joining the head butting that seems to keep affecting this thread, but thought would try to add to this.
I certainly wouldn't use the term 'terrible', but I'd say the Tour has had its critics in every decade since the 70s.
I think in many ways it is to be admired from a business sense, they have done very well - many would say at the expense of other tours.
One massive historical factor has been their tax exempt status - plenty on the 'net about that

https://www.realclearmarkets.com/ar...ng_that_the_pga_tour_is_a_charity_808930.html

https://www.espn.co.uk/espn/otl/sto...lp-fuel-giving-which-falls-industry-standards

I'm probably like many others in having come to accept the golf 'world order', and the convenience of the vast majority of top players on the Tour - with an often helpfully convenient tv viewing schedule for those in the UK. Status quo didn’t seem a bad place.

To be extremely clear, I am in no way trying to suggest this new thing is 'better'.
 

sunshine

Well-known member
Joined
Dec 17, 2018
Messages
5,493
Visit site
Their are many professions that require workers to be away from home to provide food and board plus cover travel.

Majority of professions will cover these expenses

If you go to a fixed place of work they usually dont provide these.

As a rule of thumb.

This is a fair observation, but it’s the employer who covers the travel and subsistence costs of its employees.

The caddies are employed by their pro, not the tour.
 

Barking_Mad

Well-known member
Joined
Aug 30, 2021
Messages
845
Visit site
The little player that could possibly be shafted out will have made more money last weekend to make up for it. I'm sure they will have factored that into their decision

Sam horsefield made more than any of his wins finishing 5th, that will put him on good footing.

Last place could drop out and still will be steading their ship.

Covering the expenses of the caddies was a nice touch and I think the PGA could easily follow suit.

Sam Horsfield was ranked 65th in the world and had already made £2.5m in 4 full years of being on tour. He's hardly the model of a struggling lower ranked tour pro.
 

Barking_Mad

Well-known member
Joined
Aug 30, 2021
Messages
845
Visit site
Because the hypocrisy of the PGA wasn't being highlighted by them trying to shoot down Saudi tour for things they do themsleves ie take dirty money

Why don't you just come clean and admit you want more money in the game, regardless of who is splashing it out. It's OK to be the golf fan equivalent of Phil.
 

Mel Smooth

Hacker
Joined
May 4, 2017
Messages
4,641
Visit site
Just seen something mentioned that Hovalnd and Harold Varner III could be joining the LIV, along with a few more, after the US Open has finished.
 

PJ87

Journeyman Pro
Joined
Apr 1, 2016
Messages
21,529
Location
Havering
Visit site
https://www.bunkered.co.uk/golf-news/usga-chiefs-considering-banning-liv-rebels-from-us-open

I didn’t think it would be long before the Majors got involved as well

Wouldn't be an open it would become an invotational if they banned those already qualified.

Just seen something mentioned that Hovalnd and Harold Varner III could be joining the LIV, along with a few more, after the US Open has finished.

Hovland would be cracking. He is a future major winner
 

Slab

Occasional Tour Caddy
Joined
Nov 20, 2011
Messages
11,677
Location
Port Louis
Visit site
Pretty poor article in that link

I’m not pro or anti LIV but to say the USGA considered banning players is a load of rubbish, actually they just asked themselves, did playing an LIV event provide any grounds for a player to be disqualified from the US Open?

Answer was no
 

PJ87

Journeyman Pro
Joined
Apr 1, 2016
Messages
21,529
Location
Havering
Visit site
Pretty poor article in that link

I’m not pro or anti LIV but to say the USGA considered banning players is a load of rubbish, actually they just asked themselves, did playing an LIV event provide any grounds for a player to be disqualified from the US Open?

Answer was no

Bryson has entry for 10 years from his win

If they try to ban them it's no longer an open . Same as the open

The masters can do what they want same as the PGA
 

Slab

Occasional Tour Caddy
Joined
Nov 20, 2011
Messages
11,677
Location
Port Louis
Visit site
Bryson has entry for 10 years from his win

If they try to ban them it's no longer an open . Same as the open

The masters can do what they want same as the PGA

Funny you mention those two. Just read something else I didn't know

Of the 7 golf organisations that comprise the OWGR board for dishing out ranking points, 4 are American. How on earth did an imbalance like that come about in the first place
 

PJ87

Journeyman Pro
Joined
Apr 1, 2016
Messages
21,529
Location
Havering
Visit site
Funny you mention those two. Just read something else I didn't know

Of the 7 golf organisations that comprise the OWGR board for dishing out ranking points, 4 are American. How on earth did an imbalance like that come about in the first place

It's all very geared to America. The talent has pooled there for years because the money is so high

In my opinion only. This is why the PGA are so against Liv. They don't want their dominance challenged

Their fine with the DP world tour because they stay in their lane
 

Foxholer

Blackballed
Joined
Nov 16, 2011
Messages
24,160
Visit site
Pretty poor article in that link

I’m not pro or anti LIV but to say the USGA considered banning players is a load of rubbish, actually they just asked themselves, did playing an LIV event provide any grounds for a player to be disqualified from the US Open?

Answer was no
Except that's, technically, precisely what they did - and came up with the ruling 'No'!
It will likely be 'more difficult' for LIV attached players to qualify in future though, as they won't have access to the PGA Tour for 'qualifying points'.
And, as fairly usual for Bunkered, the article seemed more after a headline than actual information, so I agree... pretty poor article.
 

Foxholer

Blackballed
Joined
Nov 16, 2011
Messages
24,160
Visit site
Greg Norman shared this on IG last night, guaranteed they'll be watching and discussing this in the locker room at the US Open today, and thinking, 'the guy is making a valid argument'
A reasonable, if very narrowly focused article. Basically, the guy is stating that money (compensation) should be the #1 driver - irrespective of the legitimacy of its source.
Rory's equally reasonable attitude, imo, is that, as long as players are being adequately compensated, it's the competition against the best in the world that's his most important driver.

FWIW, I doubt any of the US Open players will be watching that article for more thn a few seconds, if at all!!
 
Last edited:
Top