• Thanks to each and every one of you for being part of the Golf Monthly community! We hope you have a joyous holiday season!

Handicap manipulation - how to address

Slab

Occasional Tour Caddy
Joined
Nov 20, 2011
Messages
11,918
Location
Port Louis
Visit site
And many want to play without having to enter their cards into WHS. We are intending to run a weekly 'roll up' sweep this year using our pre WHS handicaps. Just for a bunch of 5 and under.

Its entirely not your problem but what about the players with 5-10 handicaps, 10-15 handicaps and 15-20 handicaps etc that find they also can't win against the blaggers? (blaggers = those ex single fig players at the club now with handicaps in the teens, I think they were described as a few pages back)
 

hambugerpete

Active member
Joined
May 11, 2024
Messages
422
Visit site
No one went up pre 1983. At least very few did.

The 1983 change meant that the odd person would go up occasionally after a long run where they failed consistently to get within their handicap. Most cat 1 and 2 golfers stayed on their handicap for years.

This WHS change was to make it easier for higher handicappers to win. Presumably by making it easier for them to go up to a high enough handicap so they could compete with these low guys.

The irony is that the system hasn't kept the low guys where they were. They've mostly got lower. Someone who tells me they play off +1 WHS is usually not what you'd expect from a +1. The high handicapper has, in general, got more shots to play with. The whole thing is stretched out. Someone somewhere has ballsed this up.

Is it because they've applied a linear solution to a nonlinear problem?

Who's more likely to shoot 10 under? 40 hand
I'm not sure whats changed , since I have played the lower handicap guys have always complained that everything is won by high handicap golfers.
It's always snacks of a sense of entitlement to me , like in how dare a guy shoot 100 and beat me.
Surely just have divisions for your comps.
The low guys always clear up on the twos at my place and most others I guess. Shall keep my pound in protest .
 

Thintowin

Active member
Joined
Dec 20, 2024
Messages
194
Visit site
I'm not sure whats changed , since I have played the lower handicap guys have always complained that everything is won by high handicap golfers.
It's always snacks of a sense of entitlement to me , like in how dare a guy shoot 100 and beat me.
Surely just have divisions for your comps.
The low guys always clear up on the twos at my place and most others I guess. Shall keep my pound in protest .
We had a healthy competition environment. Very few bandits, if any.

What's changed is that a well run club, from a handicap perspective anyway, has had the majority of that control taken off it.

WHS is a lowest common denominator leveller. Those clubs that were less controlled before aren't likely to see the difference I guess.
 

wjemather

Well-known member
Joined
Dec 3, 2020
Messages
4,045
Location
Bristol
Visit site
3. Well, I'm sure your club is one of the very few that goes to that extent in personally reminding all players to submit more scores. That being said, who cares if you have no real solution to those that don't? You are ultimately having to send these reminders out, so clearly your Club has an "issue" with golfers submitting few scores, and so these golfers will have handicaps that don't reflect ability. You haven't done anything extra about this, and I already mentioned in my initial comment that conditions can be placed on competitions to ensure golfers have a minimum amount of scores, and so that is ultimately the solution at the moment to these types of golfers. Which may well be appropriate, if clubs are placing these conditions to their comps.
Education about WHS is an ongoing process that requires regular comms - it's not something that was just done in the run-up to implementation in 2020 and then forgotten about. EG made another big push last year for clubs to educate their members regarding WHS responsibilities - perhaps your club missed that.

You make it sound like you want us to force players to submit scores, which I'm sure is not the case.
 

WorldHandicapSystem

Active member
Joined
Oct 16, 2024
Messages
116
Visit site
I don’t know one.
But know a few 16 cappers who love it.
One here for a start. As I’ve said before. I’ve not once since it’s launch had any other genuine low single figure player bring up WHS in conversation.

I doubt genuine low single figure players have any real interest in the goings on of higher handicappers.

I don’t have the stats to back it up, and I’ve said it before. The disgruntled appear to be aging golfers who were mid single figures but now have an index that is steadily creeping up, or keeping a vanity handicap which is manifesting as a feeling of being uncompetitive. Many of them seem to think that being single figures makes them special and that should be treated as such.

The way people play and enjoy golf is changing. Thankfully it’s becoming less formal and more relaxed. Which I think is what’s really upsetting some!

Anyway, must run, need to text Albert for winning the new year senior 9 hole stableford. He batted well for his 27 points 😂
 

hambugerpete

Active member
Joined
May 11, 2024
Messages
422
Visit site
We had a healthy competition environment. Very few bandits, if any.

What's changed is that a well run club, from a handicap perspective anyway, has had the majority of that control taken off it.

WHS is a lowest common denominator leveller. Those clubs that were less controlled before aren't likely to see the difference I guess.
I'm sorry I don't really understand your point.
The same whine about high handicaps is as old as the hills
Here are some examples.....




Stuff from over decade, same old story
 

bobmac

Major Champion
Joined
Feb 2, 2009
Messages
28,498
Location
Lincolnshire
Visit site
As a way of encouraging low handicappers back into club comps, give them the choice between the net comp or a gross comp?
Over the years I've played at clubs where they had divisions but the overall winner was best nett. Not brilliant.
I've also played at clubs where they had a mandatory nett entry fee and an extra fee for the gross comp so you had to pay twice. Not ideal
Then there's the clubs where they had no gross prize at all. Waste of time.

''I'd like to enter the comp please''
Pro: Certainly, that will be £3. Gross or nett ?
 

hambugerpete

Active member
Joined
May 11, 2024
Messages
422
Visit site
As a way of encouraging low handicappers back into club comps, give them the choice between the net comp or a gross comp?
Over the years I've played at clubs where they had divisions but the overall winner was best nett. Not brilliant.
I've also played at clubs where they had a mandatory nett entry fee and an extra fee for the gross comp so you had to pay twice. Not ideal
Then there's the clubs where they had no gross prize at all. Waste of time.

''I'd like to enter the comp please''
Pro: Certainly, that will be £3. Gross or nett ?
I think you'd have a very small number of entrants.
 

Thintowin

Active member
Joined
Dec 20, 2024
Messages
194
Visit site
The old we're ok so why aren't you and it's always been this way arguments. I take those sort of responses as an admission of defeat I'm afraid. Not to mention the nonsense, out of context, replies from some others.

When I joined this forum I was immediately accused of trolling. Strange how that's worked out.
 

AussieKB

Well-known member
Joined
Nov 10, 2020
Messages
1,289
Location
Australia
Visit site
Well I'm approaching 72 very quickly and still single figures.......but hope to become a double digit handicapper soon, then I might win the odd nett event....with the OZ HS I can go up 5 a year, so will make a start at that level next year if I'm lucky, just means another year of battling the young guys for gross awards.
 

bobmac

Major Champion
Joined
Feb 2, 2009
Messages
28,498
Location
Lincolnshire
Visit site
I think you'd have a very small number of entrants.
Wouldn't that depend on the amount of low h/caps
Not a new phenomenon either, many swindles have always had their own system , often very aggressive to make sure there is a good spread of winners.
This was happening long before whs
Yes, but the swindles were in addition to the comps, not instead of

I'm sorry I don't really understand your point.
The same whine about high handicaps is as old as the hills
Stuff from over decade, same old story
That just shows you how long the better players have been feeling disadvantaged

If you are having to massage handicaps to spread the winning evenly. You might as well hold a raffle.

Yeup, because there's a lot of skill involved in winning a raffle
 
Top